Suppr超能文献

舍曲林治疗恶劣心境障碍:一项针对无重度抑郁的恶劣心境障碍患者的双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

Treatment of dysthymia with sertraline: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in dysthymic patients without major depression.

作者信息

Ravindran A V, Guelfi J D, Lane R M, Cassano G B

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;61(11):821-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline has been shown to be efficacious and well tolerated for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Relatively few trials, however, have examined the role of pharmacotherapy in dysthymia without concurrent major depression. The current investigation focuses on the use of sertraline for the treatment of dysthymia.

METHOD

In this 12-week, multicenter, double-blind study, 310 patients with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of dysthymic disorder without concurrent major depression were randomly assigned to receive either sertraline (N = 158) or placebo (N = 152). Sertraline was initiated at a dose of 50 mg daily, with titration permitted to a maximum of 200 mg daily. The primary evaluation criteria were the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Seasonal Affective Disorder Version (SIGH-SAD), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and -Improvement (CGI-I) scales.

RESULTS

Mean percentage reductions for the intent-to-treat population in SIGH-SAD scores were 44.6% for the sertraline-treated group and 33.2% for the placebo-treated group (p = .03); MADRS scores, 43.6% and 33.0% (p = .02); and CGI-S scores, 32.8% and 22.8% (p = .02). A significantly greater proportion of the sertraline-treated group was classified as responders (defined for HAM-D and MADRS scores as a 50% score reduction and for CGI-I as a score of 1 or 2 by the final visit) and remitters (SIGH-SAD score < or = 8) relative to the placebo-treated group by the final visit. In addition, sertraline-treated patients experienced greater improvements in all 9 domains of the Battelle Quality of Life Questionnaire than placebo-treated patients did, with a significant difference observed in favor of sertraline in 8 of the 9 domains. The life satisfaction and social interaction quality of life domains showed significantly greater response in sertraline responders compared with placebo SIGH-SAD responders. Sertraline was well tolerated. Thirteen percent of the sertraline-treated group versus 8% of the placebo-treated group withdrew from therapy owing to adverse events (p = .14).

CONCLUSION

Sertraline is efficacious and well tolerated in the short-term treatment of dysthymia without concurrent major depression.

摘要

背景

选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂舍曲林已被证明对治疗重度抑郁症有效且耐受性良好。然而,相对较少的试验研究了药物治疗在无并发重度抑郁症的心境恶劣障碍中的作用。当前的研究聚焦于舍曲林用于治疗心境恶劣障碍。

方法

在这项为期12周的多中心双盲研究中,310例符合DSM-III-R诊断标准、无并发重度抑郁症的心境恶劣障碍患者被随机分配接受舍曲林治疗(N = 158)或安慰剂治疗(N = 152)。舍曲林起始剂量为每日50毫克,允许滴定至最大每日200毫克。主要评估标准为汉密尔顿抑郁量表季节性情感障碍版结构化访谈指南(SIGH-SAD)、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)以及临床总体印象-疾病严重程度(CGI-S)和-改善程度(CGI-I)量表。

结果

在意向性治疗人群中,舍曲林治疗组SIGH-SAD评分的平均降低百分比为44.6%,安慰剂治疗组为33.2%(p = .03);MADRS评分分别为43.6%和33.0%(p = .02);CGI-S评分分别为32.8%和22.8%(p = .02)。到最终访视时,相对于安慰剂治疗组,舍曲林治疗组中被归类为有反应者(根据HAM-D和MADRS评分定义为评分降低50%,根据CGI-I定义为最终访视时评分为1或2)和缓解者(SIGH-SAD评分≤8)的比例显著更高。此外,与安慰剂治疗组患者相比,舍曲林治疗组患者在巴特勒生活质量问卷的所有9个领域均有更大改善,在9个领域中的8个领域观察到有利于舍曲林的显著差异。与安慰剂SIGH-SAD有反应者相比,舍曲林有反应者在生活满意度和社会互动生活质量领域的反应显著更大。舍曲林耐受性良好。舍曲林治疗组13%的患者因不良事件退出治疗,而安慰剂治疗组为8%(p = .14)。

结论

舍曲林在短期治疗无并发重度抑郁症的心境恶劣障碍中有效且耐受性良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验