Proctor M L, Smith C A, Farquhar C M, Stones R W
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Women's Hospital, Claude Road, Epsom, Auckland, New Zealand, 1003.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(1):CD002123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002123.
Dysmenorrhoea is the occurrence of painful menstrual cramps of the uterus. Medical therapy for dysmenorrhoea commonly consists of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or the oral contraceptive pill both of which work by reducing myometrial (uterine muscle) activity. However, these treatments are accompanied by a number of side effects, making an effective non-pharmacological method of treating dysmenorrhoea of potential value. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a treatment that has been shown to be effective for pain relief in a variety of conditions. Electrodes are placed on the skin and electric current applied at different pulse rates (frequencies) and intensities is used to stimulate these areas so as to provide pain relief. In dysmenorrhoea. TENS is thought to work by alteration of the body's ability to receive or perceive pain signals rather than by having a direct effect on the uterine contractions. Acupuncture may also be indicated as a useful, non-pharmacological method for treating dysmenorrhoea. Acupuncture is thought to excite receptors or nerve fibres which, through a complicated interaction with mediators such as serotonin and endorphins, blocks pain impulses. Acupuncture typically involves penetration of the skin by fine, solid metallic needles, which are manipulated manually or by electrical stimulation.
To determine the effectiveness of high and low frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and acupuncture when compared to each other, placebo, no treatment, or medical treatment for primary dysmenorrhoea.
Electronic searches of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Register of controlled trials, CCTR (Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2001), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Bio extracts, PsycLIT and SPORTDiscus were performed in August 2001 to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field's Register of controlled trials (CISCOM) was also searched. Attempts were also made to identify trials from the UK National Research Register, the Clinical Trial Register and the citation lists of review articles and included trials. In most cases, the first or corresponding author of each included trial was contacted for additional information.
The inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and acupuncture that compared these treatments to each other, placebo, no treatment, or medical treatment for primary dysmenorrhoea. Exclusion criteria were: mild, infrequent or secondary dysmenorrhoea and dysmenorrhoea associated with an IUD.
Nine RCTs were identified that fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this review, seven involving TENS, one acupuncture, and one both treatments. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Meta analysis was performed using odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes. Data unsuitable for meta-analysis was reported as descriptive data and was also included for discussion. The outcome measures were pain relief (dichotomous, visual analogue scales, descriptive), adverse effects, use of analgesics additional to treatment and absence from work or school.
Overall high frequency TENS was shown to be more effective for pain relief than placebo TENS. Low frequency TENS was found to be no more effective in reducing pain than placebo TENS. There were conflicting results regarding whether high frequency TENS is more effective than low frequency TENS. One small trial showed acupuncture to be significantly more effective for pain relief than both placebo acupuncture and two no treatment control groups.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: High frequency TENS was found to be effective for the treatment of dysmenorrhoea by a number of small trials. The minor adverse effects reported in one trial requires further investigation. There is insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of low frequency TENS in reducing dysmenorrhoea. There is also insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of acupuncture in reducing dysmenorrhoea, however a single small but methodologically sound trial of acupuncture suggests benefit for this modality.
痛经是子宫出现疼痛性月经痉挛。痛经的药物治疗通常包括非甾体抗炎药或口服避孕药,两者均通过降低子宫肌层(子宫肌肉)活性发挥作用。然而,这些治疗伴随着许多副作用,因此一种有效的非药物治疗痛经的方法具有潜在价值。经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)是一种已被证明在多种情况下都能有效缓解疼痛的治疗方法。电极置于皮肤上,以不同脉冲率(频率)和强度施加电流来刺激这些区域,从而缓解疼痛。在痛经治疗中,TENS被认为是通过改变身体接收或感知疼痛信号的能力起作用,而非直接影响子宫收缩。针灸也可能是一种治疗痛经有用的非药物方法。针灸被认为是通过刺激受体或神经纤维,这些受体或神经纤维通过与血清素和内啡肽等介质的复杂相互作用来阻断疼痛冲动。针灸通常涉及用细的实心金属针穿透皮肤,这些针通过手动或电刺激进行操作。
比较高频和低频经皮电刺激神经疗法以及针灸与安慰剂、不治疗或药物治疗相比,对原发性痛经的疗效。
2001年8月对Cochrane月经失调与生育力低下组对照试验注册库、CCTR(Cochrane图书馆2001年第3期)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、生物提取物数据库、PsycLIT和SPORTDiscus进行了电子检索,以识别相关的随机对照试验(RCT)。还检索了Cochrane补充医学领域对照试验注册库(CISCOM)。还尝试从英国国家研究注册库、临床试验注册库以及综述文章和纳入试验的参考文献列表中识别试验。在大多数情况下,会联系每个纳入试验的第一作者或通讯作者以获取更多信息。
入选标准为经皮电刺激神经疗法和针灸的随机对照试验,这些试验将这些治疗方法相互比较,或将其与安慰剂、不治疗或药物治疗用于原发性痛经进行比较。排除标准为:轻度、不频繁或继发性痛经以及与宫内节育器相关的痛经。
识别出9项符合本综述纳入标准的随机对照试验,7项涉及TENS,1项涉及针灸,1项涉及两种治疗方法。由两名评价者独立进行质量评估和数据提取。采用比值比分析二分变量结局,采用加权均数差分析连续变量结局进行Meta分析。不适合Meta分析的数据以描述性数据形式报告,并纳入讨论。结局指标包括疼痛缓解(二分变量、视觉模拟量表、描述性)、不良反应、治疗外额外使用镇痛药情况以及缺勤或缺课情况。
总体而言,高频TENS在缓解疼痛方面比安慰剂TENS更有效。低频TENS在减轻疼痛方面并不比安慰剂TENS更有效。关于高频TENS是否比低频TENS更有效,结果存在矛盾。一项小型试验表明,针灸在缓解疼痛方面比安慰剂针灸和两个不治疗对照组都显著更有效。
多项小型试验发现高频TENS对治疗痛经有效。一项试验中报告的轻微不良反应需要进一步研究。没有足够证据确定低频TENS在减轻痛经方面的有效性。也没有足够证据确定针灸在减轻痛经方面的有效性,然而一项小型但方法学严谨的针灸试验表明这种方法有益。