Mercadante Sebastiano, Arcuri Edoardo, Tirelli Walter, Villari Patrizia, Casuccio Alessandra
Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Pain Relief and Palliative Care Unit, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Home Palliative Care Program, Società Assistenza Malato Oncologico Terminale, Palermo, Italy.
Tumori. 2002 May-Jun;88(3):239-42. doi: 10.1177/030089160208800310.
Amitriptyline is the most common analgesic adjuvant used in cancer patients with neuropathic pain, even though no specific studies have demonstrated a benefit. A randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study was designed to evidence the effects of amitriptyline in patients with neuropathic cancer pain.
Sixteen advanced cancer patients with neuropathic pain on systemic morphine therapy, no longer receiving oncologic treatment, presenting moderate pain (about 4 or more, but less than 7, on a numerical scale of 0-10) in the last week, and given a stable morphine dose in the last 2 days were admitted to the study. During the first week of study, patients were administered 25 mg of amitriptyline or equivalent drops of placebo at night for 3 days and 50 mg for the following 4 days. Doses for patients aged more than 65 years were 15 mg (first 3 days) and 30 mg (3 days after). After a week, a crossover took place for the second week, with the other treatment at an inverse sequence. Opioid consumption, pain intensity, symptoms and adverse effects, mood, sleep, patient's preference, quality of life before starting the study, the first week after and the second week after were recorded.
No significant benefits in analgesia were found in the global pain intensity of the previous week of treatment, the least pain intensity or the pain evaluated just after a week of treatment, at the moment of the visit, when amitriptyline was compared with placebo. A significant difference was evidenced for the worst pain (P < 0.035). No differences in opioid doses during the period of study were found. Drowsiness, confusion and dry mouth were significantly more intense with amitriptyline than with placebo (P < 0.036, 0.003, and 0.034, respectively). There were no substantial differences between the two treatments in Spitzer's quality of life score and for each item. No differences in patients' preference for the two treatment periods were found. The analgesic effects of amitriptyline were slight and associated with adverse effects.
In light of the results obtained in the study, the extensive use of the drug for cancer pain should be questioned.
尽管尚无具体研究证明其益处,但阿米替林是癌症神经性疼痛患者最常用的镇痛辅助药物。本研究设计了一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲交叉试验,以证实阿米替林对癌症神经性疼痛患者的疗效。
16例晚期癌症神经性疼痛患者,正在接受全身性吗啡治疗,不再接受肿瘤治疗,上周疼痛程度为中度(数字评分0 - 10分中约4分或更高,但低于7分),且在过去2天内吗啡剂量稳定,纳入本研究。在研究的第一周,患者于夜间服用25毫克阿米替林或等量安慰剂滴剂,持续3天,接下来4天服用50毫克。65岁以上患者的剂量为15毫克(前3天)和30毫克(3天后)。一周后,进行交叉,第二周采用相反顺序给予另一种治疗。记录阿片类药物消耗量、疼痛强度、症状及不良反应、情绪、睡眠、患者偏好、研究开始前、第一周后和第二周后的生活质量。
与安慰剂相比,在治疗前一周的总体疼痛强度、最低疼痛强度或治疗一周后就诊时评估的疼痛方面,阿米替林在镇痛方面未发现显著益处。在最严重疼痛方面有显著差异(P < 0.035)。研究期间阿片类药物剂量未发现差异。与安慰剂相比,阿米替林导致的嗜睡、意识模糊和口干明显更严重(分别为P < 0.036、0.003和0.034)。两种治疗在斯皮策生活质量评分及各项目上无实质性差异。患者对两个治疗阶段的偏好无差异。阿米替林的镇痛作用轻微且伴有不良反应。
鉴于本研究结果,应质疑该药物在癌症疼痛治疗中的广泛应用。