Du Manoir B, Aubrun F, Langlois M, Le Guern M E, Alquier C, Chauvin M, Fletcher D
Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Raymond-Poincaré, Garches, France.
Br J Anaesth. 2003 Dec;91(6):836-41. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg264.
Balanced postoperative analgesia combines non-narcotic drugs and opioids. We organized a large study to evaluate nefopam analgesia and tolerance in combination with morphine for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after orthopaedic surgery.
Two hundred and one patients scheduled to undergo hip arthroplasty were included in this multicentre (n=24), double-blind, randomized study comparing nefopam (20 mg every 4 h for 24 h) with placebo, the first dose being infused peroperatively. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative morphine dose received postoperatively by PCA over 24 h. Secondary outcome measures were the amount of morphine received as a loading dose in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) and during the 24-h observation period, and pain assessments using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a verbal pain scale (VPS), patient's satisfaction with analgesia and treatment tolerance.
The two groups were comparable with respect to their characteristics and preoperative pain assessment. PCA-administered morphine over 24 h was significantly less for the nefopam group than the control group (21.2 (15.3) and 27.3 (19.2) mg respectively; P=0.02). This morphine-sparing effect was greater (35.1%) for patients with severe preoperative pain (VAS>30/100). For the entire study period (loading dose and PCA), morphine use was less for the nefopam group (34.5 (19.6) vs 42.7 (23.6) mg; P=0.01). Pain VAS at PACU arrival and during the whole PACU period was significantly lower for the nefopam than for the placebo group (P=0.002 and 0.04 respectively). Patient satisfaction was similar for the nefopam and placebo groups.
In combination with PCA morphine, nefopam gives significant morphine-sparing with lower immediate postoperative pain scores without major side-effects. This analgesic effect seems to be particularly notable for patients with intense preoperative pain.
术后平衡镇痛结合了非麻醉药物和阿片类药物。我们组织了一项大型研究,以评估奈福泮与吗啡联合用于骨科手术后患者自控镇痛(PCA)的镇痛效果和耐受性。
本多中心(n = 24)、双盲、随机研究纳入了201例计划接受髋关节置换术的患者,将奈福泮(每4小时20 mg,共24小时)与安慰剂进行比较,首剂在术中输注。主要结局指标是术后24小时通过PCA接受的吗啡累积剂量。次要结局指标是在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)和24小时观察期内作为负荷剂量接受的吗啡量,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和语言疼痛量表(VPS)进行疼痛评估,患者对镇痛的满意度和治疗耐受性。
两组在特征和术前疼痛评估方面具有可比性。奈福泮组术后24小时通过PCA给予的吗啡量明显少于对照组(分别为21.2(15.3)mg和27.3(19.2)mg;P = 0.02)。对于术前疼痛严重(VAS> 30/100)的患者,这种吗啡节省效应更大(35.1%)。在整个研究期间(负荷剂量和PCA),奈福泮组的吗啡使用量较少(34.5(19.6)mg对42.7(23.6)mg;P = 0.01)。奈福泮组在到达PACU时和整个PACU期间的疼痛VAS明显低于安慰剂组(分别为P = 0.002和0.04)。奈福泮组和安慰剂组的患者满意度相似。
与PCA吗啡联合使用时,奈福泮可显著节省吗啡,术后即刻疼痛评分更低,且无主要副作用。这种镇痛效果对于术前疼痛剧烈的患者似乎尤为显著。