Gupta J K, Hofmeyr G J
Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK, B15 2TG.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub2.
For centuries, there has been controversy around whether being upright (sitting, birthing stools, chairs, squatting) or lying down have advantages for women delivering their babies.
To assess the benefits and risks of the use of different positions during the second stage of labour (i.e. from full dilatation of the cervix).
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (16 April 2003).
Trials that used randomised or quasi-randomised allocation and appropriate follow up and compared various positions assumed by pregnant women during the second stage of labour.
We independently assessed the trials for inclusion and extracted the data.
Results should be interpreted with caution as the methodological quality of the 19 included trials (5764 participants) was variable. Use of any upright or lateral position, compared with supine or lithotomy positions, was associated with: reduced duration of second stage of labour (10 trials: mean 4.29 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.95 to 5.64 minutes) - this was largely due to a considerable reduction in women allocated to the use of the birth cushion; a small reduction in assisted deliveries (18 trials: relative risk (RR) 0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.98); a reduction in episiotomies (12 trials: RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.91); an increase in second degree perineal tears (11 trials: RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.39); increased estimated blood loss greater than 500 ml (11 trials: RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.15); reduced reporting of severe pain during second stage of labour (1 trial: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.90); fewer abnormal fetal heart rate patterns (1 trial: RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.98).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The tentative findings of this review suggest several possible benefits for upright posture, with the possibility of increased risk of blood loss greater than 500 ml. Women should be encouraged to give birth in the position they find most comfortable. Until such time as the benefits and risks of various delivery positions are estimated with greater certainty, when methodologically stringent trials' data are available, women should be allowed to make informed choices about the birth positions in which they might wish to assume for delivery of their babies.
几个世纪以来,关于分娩时采用直立姿势(坐、使用分娩凳、椅子、蹲)还是躺卧姿势对女性更有利一直存在争议。
评估分娩第二产程(即宫颈完全扩张后)采用不同姿势的益处和风险。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2003年4月16日)。
采用随机或半随机分配并进行适当随访,比较孕妇在分娩第二产程中所采用的各种姿势的试验。
我们独立评估试验是否纳入并提取数据。
由于纳入的19项试验(5764名参与者)的方法学质量参差不齐,对结果的解读应谨慎。与仰卧位或截石位相比,采用任何直立或侧卧位与以下情况相关:分娩第二产程持续时间缩短(10项试验:平均4.29分钟,95%置信区间(CI)2.95至5.64分钟)——这主要是由于分配使用分娩垫的女性数量大幅减少;助产分娩略有减少(18项试验:相对风险(RR)0.84,95%CI 0.73至0.98);会阴切开术减少(12项试验:RR 0.84,95%CI 0.79至0.91);二度会阴撕裂增加(11项试验:RR 1.23,95%CI 1.09至1.39);估计失血量超过500毫升增加(11项试验:RR 1.68,95%CI 1.32至2.15);分娩第二产程中严重疼痛的报告减少(1项试验:RR 0.73,95%CI 0.60至0.90);异常胎儿心率模式减少(1项试验:RR 0.31,95%CI 0.08至0.98)。
本综述的初步结果表明直立姿势可能有多种益处,但失血量超过500毫升的风险可能增加。应鼓励女性采用她们觉得最舒适的姿势分娩。在通过方法学严格的试验获得更确切的各种分娩姿势的益处和风险数据之前,应允许女性就她们希望采用的分娩姿势做出明智选择。