Marinangeli Franco, Ciccozzi Alessandra, Leonardis Marco, Aloisio Luca, Mazzei Anna, Paladini Antonella, Porzio Giampiero, Marchetti Paolo, Varrassi Giustino
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of L' Aquila, L' Aquila, Italy.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 May;27(5):409-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.10.006.
The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for the treatment of cancer pain recommend nonopioid analgesics as first-line therapy, so-called "weak" analgesics combined with nonopioid analgesics as second-line therapy, and so-called "strong" opioids (with nonopioid analgesics) only as third-line therapy. However, these guidelines can be questioned with regard to the extent of efficacy as well as the rationale for not using strong opioids as first-line treatment, especially in terminal cancer patients. The purpose of this randomized study was to prospectively compare the efficacy and tolerability of strong opioids as first-line agents with the recommendations of the WHO in terminal cancer patients. One hundred patients with mild-moderate pain were randomized to treatment according to WHO guidelines or to treatment with strong opioids. Evaluated outcomes included pain intensity, need for change in therapy, quality of life, Karnofsky Performance Status, general condition of the patient, and adverse events. No between-treatment differences were observed for changes in quality of life or performance status, but patients started on strong opioids had significantly better pain relief than patients treated according to WHO guidelines (P=0.041). Additionally, patients started on strong opioids required significantly fewer changes in therapy, had greater reduction in pain when a change was initiated, and reported greater satisfaction with treatment than the comparator group (P=0.041). Strong opioids were safe and well-tolerated, with no development of tolerance or serious adverse events. These data suggest the utility of strong opioids for first-line treatment of pain in patients with terminal cancer.
世界卫生组织(WHO)的癌症疼痛治疗指南推荐非阿片类镇痛药作为一线治疗,所谓的“弱”镇痛药与非阿片类镇痛药联合作为二线治疗,而所谓的“强”阿片类药物(与非阿片类镇痛药联用)仅作为三线治疗。然而,这些指南在疗效程度以及不将强阿片类药物作为一线治疗的理由方面可能受到质疑,尤其是在晚期癌症患者中。这项随机研究的目的是前瞻性地比较强阿片类药物作为一线药物与WHO指南在晚期癌症患者中的疗效和耐受性。100例轻至中度疼痛患者被随机分为按照WHO指南进行治疗或接受强阿片类药物治疗。评估的结果包括疼痛强度、治疗变更需求、生活质量、卡氏功能状态评分、患者的一般状况以及不良事件。在生活质量或功能状态的变化方面未观察到治疗组间差异,但开始使用强阿片类药物的患者疼痛缓解明显优于按照WHO指南治疗的患者(P = 0.041)。此外,开始使用强阿片类药物的患者治疗变更次数明显更少,在开始变更治疗时疼痛减轻幅度更大,并且与对照组相比对治疗的满意度更高(P = 0.041)。强阿片类药物安全且耐受性良好,未出现耐受性或严重不良事件。这些数据表明强阿片类药物用于晚期癌症患者疼痛的一线治疗具有实用性。