Kullo Iftikhar J, Bailey Kent R, Kardia Sharon L R, Mosley Thomas H, Boerwinkle Eric, Turner Stephen T
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
Vasc Med. 2003 Nov;8(4):237-42. doi: 10.1191/1358863x03vm511oa.
Few studies have investigated whether ethnic groups differ in the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We compared the distribution of the ankle-brachial index (ABI), a measure of PAD, between African Americans and non-Hispanic white individuals. Subjects (n = 931) belonged to the Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy (GENOA) study, a community-based study of hypertensive sibships, and included 453 African Americans from Jackson, Mississipi (mean age 72 +/- 6 years, 69% women) and 478 non-Hispanic white individuals from Rochester, Minnesota (mean age 58 +/- 7 years, 64% women). ABI was determined at two sites in each lower extremity and the lowest of four indices was used in the analyses. PAD was defined as an ABI of < or = 0.95. Information about conventional risk factors was derived from interviews and from blood samples drawn at the study visit. The prevalence of diabetes and hypertension was significantly higher in African Americans than in non-Hispanic white individuals. After adjusting for age, African American subjects had a lower mean ABI (women 0.97 vs 1.04, p < 0.001; men 0.96 vs 1.12, p < 0.001) and a greater prevalence of PAD (women 34% vs 22%, p = 0.010; men 33% vs 11%, p < 0.001) than their non-Hispanic white counterparts. In multiple regression analyses, African American ethnicity was a predictor of a lower ABI and the presence of PAD in each sex after adjusting for age and other conventional risk factors. In conclusion, the lower ABI and greater prevalence of PAD in African Americans than in non-Hispanic white individuals is not explained by differences in conventional risk factors. Identifying additional 'novel' risk factors that account for the ethnic differences in PAD is an important next step towards understanding why such differences exist and developing more effective strategies to reduce the burden of PAD.
很少有研究调查不同种族在外周动脉疾病(PAD)患病率上是否存在差异。我们比较了非裔美国人和非西班牙裔白人之间作为PAD衡量指标的踝臂指数(ABI)的分布情况。研究对象(n = 931)来自动脉病遗传流行病学网络(GENOA)研究,这是一项基于社区的高血压同胞研究,包括来自密西西比州杰克逊市的453名非裔美国人(平均年龄72±6岁,69%为女性)和来自明尼苏达州罗切斯特市的478名非西班牙裔白人(平均年龄58±7岁,64%为女性)。在每个下肢的两个部位测定ABI,并在分析中使用四个指数中的最低值。PAD被定义为ABI≤0.95。关于传统风险因素的信息来自访谈以及研究访视时采集的血样。非裔美国人中糖尿病和高血压的患病率显著高于非西班牙裔白人。在调整年龄后,非裔美国受试者的平均ABI较低(女性为0.97 vs 1.04,p < 0.001;男性为0.96 vs 1.12,p < 0.001),且PAD患病率更高(女性为34% vs 22%,p = 0.010;男性为33% vs 11%,p < 0.001),高于其非西班牙裔白人 counterparts。在多元回归分析中,在调整年龄和其他传统风险因素后,非裔美国人种族是各性别中较低ABI和PAD存在的预测因素。总之,非裔美国人中ABI较低且PAD患病率高于非西班牙裔白人,这不能用传统风险因素的差异来解释。识别出导致PAD种族差异的其他“新”风险因素是理解这些差异为何存在以及制定更有效策略减轻PAD负担的重要下一步。