Stein Murray B, Pollack Mark H, Bystritsky Alexander, Kelsey Jeffrey E, Mangano Richard M
Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0985, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Jan;177(3):280-8. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1957-9. Epub 2004 Jul 16.
There is a need for new pharmacological treatments for generalized social anxiety disorder (GSAD), which is a common, often disabling condition.
To compare the efficacy and safety over 6 months duration of two dose ranges of venlafaxine extended-release (ER) with placebo in patients with GSAD.
Twenty-eight-week, double-blind, multi-center study in 386 adult outpatients with DSM-IV GSAD. Patients were randomized to placebo, venlafaxine ER fixed low dose (75 mg/day), or venlafaxine ER flexible higher dose (150-225 mg/day). Primary efficacy variable was change on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Secondary efficacy variables included, among others, the proportion of responders on the CGI Global Improvement Item (score 1 or 2), and the proportion of remitters (defined as an LSAS score of <or=30).
Improvement on the LSAS was greater with venlafaxine ER (at 75 mg/day or 150-225 mg/day) than placebo, and was sustained throughout the 6-month trial. Of patients receiving venlafaxine ER (at any dose), 58% responded to treatment compared to 33% of those receiving placebo (P<0.001); corresponding remission rates were 31% and 16% (P<0.01). There were no differences in outcome according to venlafaxine ER dosage.
Venlafaxine ER was effective in the treatment of GSAD. The comparable efficacy at low and higher doses may indicate that norepinephrine reuptake blockade does not contribute to therapeutic effect in GSAD. This hypothesis should be tested using agents with specific actions on norepinephrine reuptake blockade.
广泛性社交焦虑障碍(GSAD)是一种常见且往往会导致功能障碍的疾病,需要新的药物治疗方法。
比较两种剂量范围的文拉法辛缓释剂(ER)与安慰剂对GSAD患者6个月的疗效和安全性。
对386名符合DSM-IV标准的成年门诊GSAD患者进行为期28周的双盲多中心研究。患者被随机分为安慰剂组、文拉法辛ER固定低剂量组(75毫克/天)或文拉法辛ER灵活高剂量组(150 - 225毫克/天)。主要疗效变量是利博维茨社交焦虑量表(LSAS)的变化。次要疗效变量包括临床总体印象量表(CGI)总体改善项目(评分1或2)的有效者比例,以及缓解者比例(定义为LSAS评分≤30)。
文拉法辛ER(75毫克/天或150 - 225毫克/天)组在LSAS上的改善大于安慰剂组,且在整个6个月的试验中持续存在。接受文拉法辛ER(任何剂量)治疗的患者中,58%对治疗有反应,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者为33%(P<0.001);相应的缓解率分别为31%和16%(P<0.01)。根据文拉法辛ER剂量,结果无差异。
文拉法辛ER对GSAD有效。低剂量和高剂量疗效相当可能表明去甲肾上腺素再摄取阻断对GSAD的治疗效果没有贡献。这一假设应使用对去甲肾上腺素再摄取阻断有特定作用的药物进行验证。