Bookman Arthur A M, Williams Kate S A, Shainhouse J Zev
Dimethaid Health Care Ltd., 1405 Denison Street, Markham, Ontario L3R 5V2, Canada.
CMAJ. 2004 Aug 17;171(4):333-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031793.
Treatment of osteoarthritis with oral NSAID therapy provides pain relief but carries a substantial risk of adverse effects. Topical NSAID therapy offers an alternative to oral treatment, with the potential for a reduced risk of side effects. The objective of this trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of a topical diclofenac solution in relieving the symptoms of primary osteoarthritis of the knee.
We identified 248 men and women from southern Ontario with primary osteoarthritis of the knee and at least moderate pain. The patients were randomly assigned to apply 1 of 3 solutions to their painful knee for 4 weeks: a topical diclofenac solution (1.5% wt/wt diclofenac sodium in a carrier containing dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]); a vehicle-control solution (the carrier containing DMSO but no diclofenac); and a placebo solution (a modified carrier with a token amount of DMSO for blinding purposes but no diclofenac). The primary efficacy end point was pain relief, measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) LK3.0 Osteoarthritis Index pain subscale. Secondary end points were improved physical function and reduced stiffness (measured by the WOMAC subscales), reduced pain on walking and patient global assessment (PGA). Safety was evaluated with clinical and laboratory assessments.
In the intent-to-treat group the mean change (and 95% confidence interval [CI]) in pain score from baseline to final assessment was significantly greater for the patients who applied the topical diclofenac solution (-3.9 [- 4.8 to -2.9]) than for those who applied the vehicle-control solution (-2.5 [- 3.3 to -1.7]; p = 0.023) or the placebo solution (-2.5 [-3.3 to -1.7]; p = 0.016). For the secondary variables the topical diclofenac solution also revealed superiority to the vehicle-control and placebo solutions, leading to mean changes (and 95% CIs) of -11.6 (-14.7 to -8.4; p = 0.002 and 0.014, respectively) in physical function, -1.5 (-1.9 to -1.1; p = 0.015 and 0.002, respectively) in stiffness and -0.8 (-1.1 to -0.6; p = 0.003 and 0.015, respectively) in pain on walking. The PGA scores were significantly better for the patients who applied the topical diclofenac solution than for those who applied the other 2 solutions (p = 0.039 and 0.025, respectively). The topical diclofenac solution caused some skin irritation, mostly minor local skin dryness, in 30 (36%) of the 84 patients, but this led to discontinuation of treatment in only 5 (6%) of the cases. The incidence of gastrointestinal events did not differ between the treatment groups. No serious gastrointestinal or renal adverse events were reported or detected by means of laboratory testing.
This topical diclofenac solution can provide safe, site-specific treatment for osteoarthritic pain, with only minor local skin irritation and minimal systemic side effects.
口服非甾体抗炎药治疗骨关节炎可缓解疼痛,但存在显著的不良反应风险。局部用非甾体抗炎药治疗为口服治疗提供了一种替代方案,有可能降低副作用风险。本试验的目的是评估双氯芬酸溶液局部用药缓解膝关节原发性骨关节炎症状的安全性和有效性。
我们从安大略省南部招募了248名患有膝关节原发性骨关节炎且至少有中度疼痛的男性和女性。患者被随机分配在疼痛的膝关节上涂抹三种溶液中的一种,持续4周:一种双氯芬酸溶液(1.5%重量/重量的双氯芬酸钠,载体中含有二甲基亚砜[DMSO]);一种赋形剂对照溶液(载体中含有DMSO但不含双氯芬酸);以及一种安慰剂溶液(一种改良载体,含有少量DMSO用于盲法,但不含双氯芬酸)。主要疗效终点是疼痛缓解情况,通过西安大略和麦克马斯特大学(WOMAC)LK3.0骨关节炎指数疼痛子量表进行测量。次要终点是身体功能改善和僵硬程度减轻(通过WOMAC子量表测量)、行走时疼痛减轻以及患者整体评估(PGA)。通过临床和实验室评估来评估安全性。
在意向性治疗组中,涂抹双氯芬酸溶液的患者从基线到最终评估的疼痛评分平均变化(及95%置信区间[CI])显著大于涂抹赋形剂对照溶液的患者(-3.9[-4.8至-2.9])或涂抹安慰剂溶液的患者(-2.5[-3.3至-1.7];p = 0.023和0.016)。对于次要变量,双氯芬酸溶液也显示出优于赋形剂对照溶液和安慰剂溶液,导致身体功能平均变化(及95% CI)为-11.6(-14.7至-8.4;p分别为0.002和0.014)、僵硬程度变化为-1.5(-1.9至-1.1;p分别为0.015和0.002)以及行走时疼痛变化为-0.8(-1.1至-0.6;p分别为0.003和0.015)。涂抹双氯芬酸溶液的患者的PGA评分显著优于涂抹其他两种溶液的患者(p分别为0.039和0.025)。双氯芬酸溶液在84名患者中的30名(36%)引起了一些皮肤刺激,主要是轻微的局部皮肤干燥,但只有5名(6%)患者因此停止治疗。治疗组之间胃肠道事件的发生率没有差异。未报告严重的胃肠道或肾脏不良事件,实验室检测也未检测到。
这种双氯芬酸溶液可为骨关节炎疼痛提供安全、局部特异性治疗,仅伴有轻微的局部皮肤刺激和极小的全身副作用。