DeBusk Robert Frank, Miller Nancy Houston, Parker Kathleen Marie, Bandura Albert, Kraemer Helena Chmura, Cher Daniel Joseph, West Jeffrey Alan, Fowler Michael Bruce, Greenwald George
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94304-5735, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Oct 19;141(8):606-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-8-200410190-00008.
Nurse care management programs for patients with chronic illness have been shown to be safe and effective.
To determine whether a telephone-mediated nurse care management program for heart failure reduced the rate of rehospitalization for heart failure and for all causes over a 1-year period.
Randomized, controlled trial of usual care with nurse management versus usual care alone in patients hospitalized for heart failure from May 1998 through October 2001.
5 northern California hospitals in a large health maintenance organization.
Of 2786 patients screened, 462 met clinical criteria for heart failure and were randomly assigned (228 to intervention and 234 to usual care).
Nurse care management provided structured telephone surveillance and treatment for heart failure and coordination of patients' care with primary care physicians.
Time to first rehospitalization for heart failure or for any cause and time to a combined end point of first rehospitalization, emergency department visit, or death.
At 1 year, half of the patients had been rehospitalized at least once and 11% had died. Only one third of rehospitalizations were for heart failure. The rate of first rehospitalization for heart failure was similar in both groups (proportional hazard, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.46 to 1.57]). The rate of all-cause rehospitalization was similar (proportional hazard, 0.98 [CI, 0.76 to 1.27]).
The findings of this study, conducted in a single health care system, may not be generalizable to other health care systems. The overall effect of the intervention was minor.
Among patients with heart failure at low risk on the basis of sociodemographic and medical attributes, nurse care management did not statistically significantly reduce rehospitalizations for heart failure or for any cause. Such programs may be less effective for patients at low risk than those at high risk.
针对慢性病患者的护士护理管理项目已被证明是安全有效的。
确定一项通过电话介导的针对心力衰竭患者的护士护理管理项目在1年时间内是否能降低心力衰竭再住院率及全因再住院率。
1998年5月至2001年10月期间,对因心力衰竭住院的患者进行的常规护理加护士管理与单纯常规护理的随机对照试验。
北加利福尼亚州一家大型健康维护组织中的5家医院。
在2786名接受筛查的患者中,462名符合心力衰竭临床标准,并被随机分配(228名接受干预,234名接受常规护理)。
护士护理管理为心力衰竭提供结构化电话监测和治疗,并协调患者与初级保健医生的护理。
首次因心力衰竭或任何原因再住院的时间,以及首次再住院、急诊就诊或死亡的综合终点时间。
1年后,一半的患者至少再住院一次,11%的患者死亡。只有三分之一的再住院是因心力衰竭。两组首次因心力衰竭再住院率相似(风险比例为0.85[95%CI,0.46至1.57])。全因再住院率相似(风险比例为0.98[CI,0.76至1.27])。
本研究在单一医疗系统中进行,其结果可能不适用于其他医疗系统。干预的总体效果较小。
在基于社会人口统计学和医学特征处于低风险的心力衰竭患者中,护士护理管理在统计学上并未显著降低心力衰竭或任何原因导致的再住院率。此类项目对低风险患者可能不如对高风险患者有效。