Bisgard Kristine M, Rhodes Philip, Connelly Beverly L, Bi Daoling, Hahn Christine, Patrick Sarah, Glodé Mary P, Ehresmann Kristen R
DVM, National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, M/S E-61, Atlanta, GA 30333.
Pediatrics. 2005 Aug;116(2):e285-94. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2759.
Despite the dramatic pertussis decrease since the licensure of whole-cell pertussis (diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-pertussis [DTP]) vaccines in the middle 1940s, pertussis remains endemic in the United States and can cause illness among persons at any age; >11000 pertussis cases were reported in 2003. Since July 1996, in addition to 2 DTP vaccines already in use, 5 acellular pertussis (diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-acellular pertussis [DTaP]) vaccines were licensed for use among infants; 3 DTaP vaccines were distributed widely during the study period. Because of the availability of 3 DTaP and 2 DTP vaccines and the likelihood of the vaccines being used interchangeably to vaccinate children with the recommended 5-dose schedule, measuring the effectiveness of the pertussis vaccines was a high priority.
To measure the pertussis vaccine effectiveness (VE) among US children 6 to 59 months of age.
We conducted a case-control study in the Cincinnati, Ohio, metropolitan area, Colorado, Idaho, and Minnesota.
Confirmed pertussis cases among children 6 to 59 months of age at the time of disease onset, with onset in 1998-2001, were included. For each case subject, 5 control children were matched from birth certificate records, according to the date of birth and residence.
A standardized questionnaire was used to obtain vaccination data from parents and providers. Parents/guardians were asked about demographic characteristics, child care attendance, the number of household members who stayed at the same home as the enrolled child for > or =2 nights per week, and cough illness of > or =2-week duration among these household members in the month before the case patient's cough onset. Pertussis vaccine doses among case children were counted as valid if they were received > or =14 days before the cough onset date ("valid period"). The age of the case patient (in days) at the end of the valid period was determined, and doses of vaccine for the matched control subjects were counted as valid if they were received by that age. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the matched odds ratios (ORs) for pertussis according to the number of pertussis vaccine doses. The VE was calculated with the following formula: (1 - OR) x 100. Because the pertussis antigen components or amounts differed according to vaccine, the VE of 3 or 4 doses of DTP and/or DTaP was estimated according to the recorded vaccine manufacturer and vaccine type.
All enrolled children (184 case subjects and 893 control subjects) had their vaccine history verified. The proportions of children who received 0, 1 or 2, 3, and > or =4 pertussis (DTP and/or DTaP) vaccine doses among case subjects were 26%, 14%, 26%, and 34% and among control subjects were 2%, 8%, 33%, and 57%, respectively. Compared with 0 doses, the unadjusted VE estimate for 1 or 2 pertussis doses was 83.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61.1-93.1%), that for 3 doses was 95.6% (95% CI: 89.7-98.0%), and for > or =4 doses was 97.7% (95% CI: 94.7-99.0%). Among children who received 4 pertussis vaccinations, the risk of pertussis was slightly higher among those who received only 1 type of vaccine (either 4 DTP doses or 4 DTaP doses), compared with those who received a combination of DTP for doses 1 to 3 and DTaP for dose 4 (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1-5.2). Among children who received 3 or 4 DTaP vaccine doses, the risk of pertussis was slightly higher among those who received a DTaP vaccine with 4 pertussis antigen components (a vaccine no longer available), compared with those who received the DTaP vaccine with 2 pertussis antigen components (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.1-5.8). Among children who received 4 doses, the risk of pertussis was 2.7 times higher for children who received dose 4 early (age of < or =13 months), compared with children who received dose 4 at an older age (age of > or =14 months) (95% CI: 1.1-6.8). For children 6 to 23 months of age, features of household structure were significant risk factors for pertussis. In a multivariate model, compared with living with an older parent (> or =25 years of age), not living with an "other" household member (a relative other than a parent or sibling or a nonrelated person), and not living with a sibling 6 to 11 years of age, the risk of pertussis for children 6 to 23 months of age was 6.8 times higher if they lived with a young parent (< or =24 years of age) (95% CI: 3.1-15.0), 2.5 times higher if they lived with an "other" household member (95% CI: 1.2-5.4), and 2.2 times higher if they lived with a sibling 6 to 11 years of age (95% CI: 1.2-4.3). Adjusting for these risk factors did not change the VE. Compared with control children, case children were significantly more likely to live with a household member (representing all age groups and relationships) who reported a recent cough illness with duration of > or =2 weeks (87 [52%] of 168 case subjects, compared with 79 [8%] of 860 control subjects).
Any combination of > or =3 DTP/DTaP vaccine doses for children 6 to 59 months of age was highly protective against pertussis. However, there were differences according to vaccine type (DTaP or DTP) and DTaP manufacturer. Among children who received 4 pertussis vaccine doses, a combination of 3 DTP doses followed by 1 DTaP dose had a slightly higher VE than other combinations; among children who received 3 or 4 DTaP vaccine doses, 1 DTaP vaccine performed less well. The finding that pertussis dose 4 was more effective when given to children at > or =14 months of age might be confounded if health care providers were more likely to vaccinate children at 12 months of age because of a perceived risk of undervaccination and if these same children were also at higher risk for pertussis. Household members of any age group and relationship could have been the source of pertussis, and household structure was associated with risk for pertussis for children 6 to 23 months of age. In contrast to control children in the study, 26% of case children had never been vaccinated against pertussis. Unvaccinated children are at risk for pertussis and, in a community with other unvaccinated children, can lead to community-wide pertussis outbreaks. Parents need to be educated about the morbidity and mortality risks associated with Bordetella pertussis infection, and they need to be encouraged to vaccinate their children against pertussis on time and with the recommended number of vaccine doses for optimal protection.
尽管自20世纪40年代中期全细胞百日咳(白喉-破伤风类毒素-百日咳[DTP])疫苗获得许可以来,百日咳发病率大幅下降,但百日咳在美国仍呈地方性流行,可导致任何年龄段的人患病;2003年报告的百日咳病例超过11000例。自1996年7月起,除了已在使用的2种DTP疫苗外,又有5种无细胞百日咳(白喉-破伤风类毒素-无细胞百日咳[DTaP])疫苗获得许可用于婴儿;在研究期间,3种DTaP疫苗得到广泛分发。由于有3种DTaP疫苗和2种DTP疫苗可供使用,且这些疫苗可能会按照推荐的5剂接种程序交替用于儿童接种,因此衡量百日咳疫苗的有效性成为当务之急。
测量美国6至59月龄儿童中百日咳疫苗的有效性(VE)。
我们在俄亥俄州辛辛那提市大都市区、科罗拉多州、爱达荷州和明尼苏达州开展了一项病例对照研究。
纳入1998 - 2001年疾病发作时年龄在6至59月龄的确诊百日咳病例。对于每个病例,根据出生证明记录,按照出生日期和居住地匹配5名对照儿童。
使用标准化问卷从家长和医疗机构获取疫苗接种数据。询问家长/监护人有关人口统计学特征、儿童看护情况、每周与登记儿童同住≥2晚的家庭成员数量,以及病例患者咳嗽发作前一个月内这些家庭成员中持续≥2周的咳嗽疾病情况。病例儿童的百日咳疫苗剂量在咳嗽发作日期前≥14天接种则计为有效(“有效期”)。确定病例患者在有效期结束时的年龄(以天计),匹配的对照儿童在该年龄前接种的疫苗剂量计为有效。使用条件逻辑回归模型根据百日咳疫苗剂量数估计百日咳的匹配比值比(OR)。VE按以下公式计算:(1 - OR)×100。由于百日咳抗原成分或含量因疫苗而异,根据记录的疫苗生产商和疫苗类型估计3剂或4剂DTP和/或DTaP的VE。
所有纳入儿童(184例病例和893名对照)的疫苗接种史均得到核实。病例组中接受0剂、1或2剂、3剂以及≥4剂百日咳(DTP和/或DTaP)疫苗的儿童比例分别为26%、14%、26%和34%,对照组中相应比例分别为2%、8%、33%和57%。与0剂相比,1或2剂百日咳疫苗未经调整的VE估计值为83.6%(95%置信区间[CI]:61.1 - 93.1%),3剂为95.6%(95% CI:89.7 - 98.0%),≥4剂为97.7%(95% CI:94.7 - 99.0%)。在接受4剂百日咳疫苗接种的儿童中,仅接种1种疫苗(4剂DTP或4剂DTaP)的儿童患百日咳的风险略高于接种1至3剂DTP和第4剂DTaP联合疫苗的儿童(OR:2.4;95% CI:1.1 - 5.2)。在接受3或4剂DTaP疫苗接种的儿童中,接种含4种百日咳抗原成分DTaP疫苗(该疫苗已不再可用)的儿童患百日咳的风险略高于接种含2种百日咳抗原成分DTaP疫苗的儿童(OR:2.5;95% CI:1.1 - 5.8)。在接受4剂疫苗接种的儿童中,4剂接种较早(年龄≤13个月)的儿童患百日咳的风险是接种年龄较大(年龄≥14个月)儿童的2.7倍(95% CI:1.1 - 6.8)。对于6至23月龄的儿童,家庭结构特征是百日咳的重要危险因素。在多变量模型中,与与年龄较大的父母(≥25岁)同住相比,6至23月龄儿童若与年轻父母(≤24岁)同住,患百日咳的风险高6.8倍(95% CI:3.1 - 15.0);若与“其他”家庭成员同住,风险高2.5倍(95% CI:1.2 - 5.4);若与6至11岁的兄弟姐妹同住,风险高2.2倍(95% CI:1.2 - 4.3)。对这些危险因素进行调整后,VE未发生变化。与对照儿童相比,病例儿童与报告近期咳嗽持续≥2周的家庭成员(代表所有年龄组和关系)同住的可能性显著更高(168例病例中有87例[52%],而860名对照中有79例[8%])。
6至59月龄儿童接种≥3剂DTP/DTaP疫苗的任何组合对百日咳均具有高度保护作用。然而,根据疫苗类型(DTaP或DTP)和DTaP生产商不同存在差异。在接受4剂百日咳疫苗接种的儿童中,3剂DTP后接1剂DTaP的联合疫苗VE略高于其他组合;在接受3或4剂DTaP疫苗接种的儿童中,1种DTaP疫苗的效果稍差。如果医疗保健人员因认为存在疫苗接种不足风险而更倾向于在12月龄时为儿童接种疫苗,且这些儿童患百日咳的风险也较高,那么4剂百日咳疫苗在14月龄及以上儿童中接种效果更佳这一发现可能会受到混淆。任何年龄组和关系的家庭成员都可能是百日咳的传染源,家庭结构与6至23月龄儿童的百日咳风险相关。与研究中的对照儿童相比,26%的病例儿童从未接种过百日咳疫苗。未接种疫苗的儿童有患百日咳的风险,在有其他未接种疫苗儿童的社区中,可能导致社区范围的百日咳暴发。需要对家长进行有关百日咳博德特氏菌感染相关发病和死亡风险的教育,并鼓励他们按时为孩子接种百日咳疫苗,并按照推荐的疫苗剂数进行接种以获得最佳保护。