Friedl Karl E
US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts 01760-5007, USA.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005 Nov;14(9):764-802. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.764.
In 1994, Congress provided dollar 40 M for biomedical research on issues of importance for military women. This supported 104 intramural and 30 extramural studies and launched an era of research to narrow the knowledge gap on protection and enhancement of health and performance of military women. Projects addressed issues specific to female physiology (e.g., gynecological health in the field, maternal malaria), problems with higher prevalence for women (e.g., marginal iron deficiency, stress fracture), and issues of drug and materiel safety that had only been extrapolated from studies of men (e.g., chemical agent prophylaxis, fatigue countermeasures). Several important assumptions about female physiology and occupational risks were found to be astoundingly wrong. Hormonal changes through the menstrual cycle were less important to acute health risks and performance than predicted, exercise did not increase risk for amenorrhea and consequent bone mineral loss, and women tolerated G-forces and could be as safe as men in the cockpit if their equipment was designed for normal size and strength ranges. Data on personal readiness issues, such as body fat, physical fitness, nutrition, and postpartum return to duty, allowed reconsideration of standards that were gender appropriate and not simply disconnected adjustments to existing male standards. Other discoveries directly benefited men as well as women, including development of medical surveillance databases, identification of task strength demands jeopardizing safety and performance, and greater understanding of the effects of psychosocial stress on health and performance. This surge of research has translated into advances for the welfare of service women and the readiness of the entire force; relevant gender issues are now routine considerations for researchers and equipment developers, and some key remaining research gaps of special importance to military women continue to be investigated.
1994年,国会拨款4000万美元用于开展对军事女性具有重要意义的生物医学研究。这笔资金支持了104项校内研究和30项校外研究,开启了一个研究时代,旨在缩小在保护和提升军事女性健康及表现方面的知识差距。这些项目涉及女性生理特有的问题(如战地妇科健康、孕产妇疟疾)、女性中患病率较高的问题(如边缘性缺铁、应力性骨折)以及此前仅从男性研究推断而来的药物和物资安全问题(如化学战剂预防、疲劳应对措施)。人们发现,一些关于女性生理和职业风险的重要假设竟然大错特错。月经周期中的激素变化对急性健康风险和表现的影响不如预期的那么重要,运动并不会增加闭经及随之而来的骨质流失风险,而且如果设备是按照正常的尺寸和力量范围设计的,女性能够耐受重力,在驾驶舱内可以和男性一样安全。关于个人准备情况问题的数据,如体脂、体能、营养以及产后重返岗位等,促使人们重新审视那些适合性别的标准,而不是简单地对现有的男性标准进行不相关的调整。其他一些发现对男性和女性都有直接益处,包括医学监测数据库的开发、识别危及安全和表现的任务强度要求,以及对心理社会压力对健康和表现影响的更深入理解。这股研究热潮已经转化为对服役女性福利和整个部队战备状态的提升;相关的性别问题现在已成为研究人员和装备开发者的常规考量因素,一些对军事女性尤为重要的关键研究空白仍在继续进行调查。