Delaney E K, Murchie P, Lee A J, Ritchie L D, Campbell N C
Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Centre, Aberdeen, UK.
Heart. 2008 Nov;94(11):1419-23. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.126144. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
To evaluate the effects of nurse-led secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease (CHD) in primary care on total mortality and coronary event rates after 10 years.
Follow-up of a randomised controlled trial by review of national datasets.
Stratified random sample of 19 general practices in northeast Scotland.
Original study cohort of 1343 patients, aged <80 years, with a working diagnosis of CHD, but without dementia or terminal illness and not housebound.
Nurse-led secondary prevention clinics promoted medical and lifestyle aspects of secondary prevention and offered regular follow-up for 1 year,
Total mortality and coronary events (non-fatal myocardial infarctions (MIs) and coronary deaths).
Mean (SD) follow-up was at 10.2 (0.19) years. No significant differences in total mortality or coronary events were found at 10 years. 254 patients in the intervention group and 277 patients in the control group had died: cumulative death rates were 38% and 41%, respectively (p = 0.177). 196 coronary events occurred in the intervention group and 195 in the control group: cumulative event rates were 29.1% and 29.1%, respectively (p = 0.994). When Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, adjusted for age, sex and general practice, was used, proportional hazard ratios were 0.88 (0.74 to 1.04) for total mortality and 0.96 (0.79 to 1.18) for coronary death or non-fatal MI. No significant differences in the distribution of cause of death classifications was found at either 4 or 10 years.
After 10 years, differences between groups were no longer significant. Total mortality survival curves for the intervention and control groups had not converged, but the coronary event survival curves had. Possibly, therefore, the earlier that secondary prevention is optimised, the less likely a subsequent coronary event is to prove fatal.
评估初级保健中由护士主导的冠心病二级预防诊所对10年后总死亡率和冠心病事件发生率的影响。
通过审查国家数据集对一项随机对照试验进行随访。
苏格兰东北部19家普通诊所的分层随机样本。
1343名年龄小于80岁、初步诊断为冠心病、无痴呆或晚期疾病且非居家的患者组成的原始研究队列。
由护士主导的二级预防诊所促进二级预防的医疗和生活方式方面,并提供为期1年的定期随访。
总死亡率和冠心病事件(非致命性心肌梗死和冠心病死亡)。
平均(标准差)随访时间为10.2(0.19)年。10年时,总死亡率或冠心病事件未发现显著差异。干预组254例患者和对照组277例患者死亡:累积死亡率分别为38%和41%(p = 0.177)。干预组发生196例冠心病事件,对照组发生195例:累积事件发生率分别为29.1%和29.1%(p = 0.994)。当采用按年龄、性别和普通诊所进行调整的Kaplan-Meier生存分析时,总死亡率的比例风险比为0.88(0.74至1.04),冠心病死亡或非致命性心肌梗死的比例风险比为0.96(0.79至1.18)。在4年和10年时,死亡原因分类分布均未发现显著差异。
10年后,组间差异不再显著。干预组和对照组的总死亡率生存曲线未趋同,但冠心病事件生存曲线已趋同。因此,二级预防优化得越早,后续冠心病事件致命的可能性可能就越小。