LaKind Judy S, Barraj Leila, Tran Nga, Aylward Lesa L
Summit Toxicology, L.L.P., Falls Church, VA 22044, USA.
J Environ Health. 2008 May;70(9):61-4.
Biomonitoring, the measurement of chemicals in blood, urine, and other tissues or fluids, is becoming an increasingly common tool in the study of human exposure to environmental chemicals and the potential health effects of those chemicals. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) now includes biomonitoring data for hundreds of chemicals as well as information on other health and demographic endpoints for thousands of individuals in the United States. The NHANES databases provide valuable information for deriving reference ranges and trend information and can be used for hypothesis-generating analyses, but they cannot be used to establish causal relationships between environmental chemicals and health effects. This commentary examines issues unique to the use of such databases and the interpretation of biomonitoring-based epidemiological studies.
生物监测,即对血液、尿液以及其他组织或体液中的化学物质进行测量,正日益成为研究人类接触环境化学物质及其潜在健康影响的常用工具。美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)目前包含了数百种化学物质的生物监测数据,以及美国数千人的其他健康和人口统计学终点信息。NHANES数据库为推导参考范围和趋势信息提供了有价值的信息,可用于假设生成分析,但不能用于确定环境化学物质与健康影响之间的因果关系。本评论探讨了使用此类数据库以及解读基于生物监测的流行病学研究时所特有的问题。