Suppr超能文献

广泛性焦虑症中疼痛的影响:度洛西汀的疗效

Implications of pain in generalized anxiety disorder: efficacy of duloxetine.

作者信息

Hartford James T, Endicott Jean, Kornstein Susan G, Allgulander Christer, Wohlreich Madelaine M, Russell James M, Perahia David G S, Erickson Janelle S

机构信息

Hartford Research Group, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;10(3):197-204. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v10n0304.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a post hoc evaluation of the prevalence of clinically significant pain and the efficacy of duloxetine in patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and concurrent pain.

METHOD

Data from two 9- to 10-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials of duloxetine (60 to 120 mg) in DSM-IV-defined GAD were analyzed (study 1 was conducted from July 2004 to September 2005; study 2 was conducted from August 2004 to June 2005). Efficacy was assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), visual analog scales (VAS) for pain, the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement of Illness (CGI-I) scale, the Patient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) scale, and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) global functional impairment scale.

RESULTS

Of 840 patients randomly assigned to treatment, 61.3% (302 duloxetine, 213 placebo) had VAS scores ≥ 30 mm on at least 1 of the pain scales, indicating clinically significant pain. Among those patients with concurrent pain at baseline, change from baseline to endpoint in the HAM-A total score (42.9% change in mean scores for duloxetine, 31.4% for placebo), HADS anxiety scale (40.3% vs. 22.8%), HADS depression scale (36.1% vs. 20.5%), HAM-A psychic factor (45.9% vs. 29.9%), and SDS global functional improvement score (45.5% vs. 22.1%) was significantly (all p's < .001) greater for duloxetine compared with placebo. Improvement on the CGI-I (p = .003) and PGI-I (p < .001) was also significantly greater for duloxetine. Response (HAM-A total score decrease ≥ 50%) (49% vs. 29%) and remission (HAM-A total score ≤ 7 at endpoint) (29% vs. 18%) rates were significantly greater for duloxetine compared with placebo (p < .001 and p = .041, respectively). Duloxetine demonstrated statistically significantly greater reduction in pain on all 6 VAS pain scales (all p's < .001 except headaches with p < .002) (for duloxetine, percent change in means from baseline to endpoint ranged from 40.1% to 45.2% across the 6 VAS scales; for placebo, 22.0% to 26.3%).

CONCLUSION

Duloxetine, relative to placebo, improves anxiety symptoms, pain, and functional impairment among patients with GAD with concurrent clinically significant pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00122824 (study 1) and NCT00475969 (study 2).

摘要

目的

对广泛性焦虑症(GAD)合并疼痛患者中具有临床意义的疼痛患病率及度洛西汀的疗效进行事后评估。

方法

分析了两项为期9至10周的双盲、安慰剂对照、度洛西汀(60至120毫克)治疗DSM-IV定义的GAD的随机临床试验数据(研究1于2004年7月至2005年9月进行;研究2于2004年8月至2005年6月进行)。疗效通过汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、临床总体印象-疾病改善量表(CGI-I)、患者总体印象-改善量表(PGI-I)以及希恩残疾量表(SDS)全球功能损害量表进行评估。

结果

在随机分配接受治疗的840名患者中,61.3%(度洛西汀组302例,安慰剂组213例)在至少一个疼痛量表上的VAS评分≥30毫米,表明存在具有临床意义的疼痛。在基线时合并疼痛的患者中,度洛西汀组从基线到终点的HAM-A总分变化(平均得分变化42.9%,安慰剂组为31.4%)、HADS焦虑量表(40.3%对22.8%)、HADS抑郁量表(36.1%对20.5%)、HAM-A心理因子(45.9%对29.9%)以及SDS全球功能改善评分(45.5%对22.1%)均显著高于安慰剂组(所有p值均<0.001)。度洛西汀在CGI-I(p = 0.003)和PGI-I(p < 0.001)方面的改善也显著更大。度洛西汀的反应率(HAM-A总分降低≥50%)(49%对29%)和缓解率(终点时HAM-A总分≤7)(29%对18%)显著高于安慰剂组(分别为p < 0.001和p = 0.041)。度洛西汀在所有6个VAS疼痛量表上的疼痛减轻均具有统计学显著意义(除头痛p < 0.002外,所有p值均<0.001)(度洛西汀组,6个VAS量表从基线到终点的平均变化百分比在40.1%至45.2%之间;安慰剂组为22.0%至26.3%)。

结论

相对于安慰剂,度洛西汀可改善GAD合并具有临床意义疼痛患者的焦虑症状、疼痛及功能损害。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00122824(研究1)和NCT004*75969(研究2)。

相似文献

1
Implications of pain in generalized anxiety disorder: efficacy of duloxetine.
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;10(3):197-204. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v10n0304.
3
Efficacy of duloxetine for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: implications for primary care physicians.
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;9(2):100-7. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v09n0203.
8
Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.01.002.

引用本文的文献

2
The Effects of Inflammatory Tooth Pain on Anxiety in Adult Male Rats.
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2016 Jul;7(3):259-68. doi: 10.15412/J.BCN.03070311.
3
Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders.
BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-S1-S1. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
4
Attributes of response in depressed patients switched to treatment with duloxetine.
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Jan;65(1):73-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02546.x. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
5
Duloxetine for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a review.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:23-31. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
6
Duloxetine: a review of its use in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.
CNS Drugs. 2009;23(6):523-41. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200923060-00006.

本文引用的文献

2
Efficacy of duloxetine in painful symptoms: an analgesic or antidepressant effect?
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Nov;21(6):311-7. doi: 10.1097/01.yic.0000224782.83287.3c.
7
9
Duloxetine vs. placebo in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.
Pain. 2005 Jul;116(1-2):109-18. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.03.029.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验