Suppr超能文献

显色念珠菌琼脂和 CHROMagar Candida 在单真菌和多真菌阴道分离物的回收和初步鉴定中的性能。

Performance of Chromogenic Candida agar and CHROMagar Candida in recovery and presumptive identification of monofungal and polyfungal vaginal isolates.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology.

出版信息

Med Mycol. 2010 Feb;48(1):29-34. doi: 10.3109/13693780802713224.

Abstract

Chromogenic Candida agar (OCCA) is a novel medium facilitating isolation and identification of Candida albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei, as well as indicating polyfungal population in clinical samples. We compare the performance of OCCA, to CHROMagar Candida (CAC) and Sabouraud chloramphenicol agar (SCA). Vaginal swab samples from 392 women were simultaneously inoculated onto three study media. A total of 161 (41.1%) were found to be positive for fungi of which 140 (87%) were monofungal, and 21 (13%) polyfungal. One-hundred and fifty-seven samples (97.5%) were positive on CAC, 156 (96.9%) on OCCA, 148 (91.9%) on SCA and 144 (89.4%) samples were positive on all three media. The yeasts were identified by conventional methods including germ tube test, microscopic morphology on cornmeal-Tween 80 agar, and the commercial API 20C AUX. The 182 isolates were C. albicans (n = 104), C. glabrata (n = 51), C. krusei (n = 7), C. tropicalis (n = 5), C. famata (n = 3), C. kefyr (n = 3), C. zeylanoides (n = 3), C. colliculosa (n = 2), and other species of Candida (n = 4). Among the 21 polyfungal populations, 20 (95.2%) were detected in OCCA, 14 (66.7%) in CAC, and 13 (61.9%) in CAC and OCCA (P <0.05). Most polyfungal populations (47.6%) yielded C. albicans + C. glabrata. The efficiency of both chromogenic media for C. albicans was >or=92.9% at 72 h. OCCA is more efficient and reliable for rapidly identifying C. albicans and polyfungal populations than CAC. However, CAC is more efficient for identifying C. krusei and C. tropicalis. A chromogenic agar with a higher isolation rate of yeasts and better detection of polyfungal populations than SCA, is suggested as a medium of first choice when available.

摘要

显色念珠菌琼脂(OCCA)是一种新型培养基,可促进白色念珠菌、热带念珠菌和克柔念珠菌的分离和鉴定,并可指示临床样本中的多真菌种群。我们比较了 OCCA 与显色念珠菌琼脂(CAC)和沙保罗琼脂氯霉素(SCA)的性能。对 392 名女性的阴道拭子样本同时接种到三种研究培养基上。共有 161 份(41.1%)真菌阳性,其中 140 份(87%)为单真菌,21 份(13%)为多真菌。157 份样本(97.5%)在 CAC 上呈阳性,156 份(96.9%)在 OCCA 上呈阳性,148 份(91.9%)在 SCA 上呈阳性,144 份(89.4%)样本在所有三种培养基上均呈阳性。酵母通过常规方法鉴定,包括芽管试验、玉米粉-吐温 80 琼脂上的微观形态学和商业 API 20C AUX。182 株分离株为白色念珠菌(n=104)、光滑念珠菌(n=51)、克柔念珠菌(n=7)、热带念珠菌(n=5)、法氏念珠菌(n=3)、凯氏念珠菌(n=3)、近平滑念珠菌(n=3)、科尔比念珠菌(n=2)和其他念珠菌属物种(n=4)。在 21 个多真菌群体中,20 个(95.2%)在 OCCA 中检测到,14 个(66.7%)在 CAC 中检测到,13 个(61.9%)在 CAC 和 OCCA 中检测到(P<0.05)。大多数多真菌群体(47.6%)产生白色念珠菌+光滑念珠菌。两种显色培养基在 72 小时时对白色念珠菌的效率均>92.9%。OCCA 比 CAC 更能快速鉴定白色念珠菌和多真菌种群,更有效、更可靠。然而,CAC 更有效地鉴定克柔念珠菌和热带念珠菌。建议使用一种比沙保罗琼脂具有更高酵母分离率和更好多真菌种群检测能力的显色琼脂作为首选培养基。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验