Siddiqi Arjumand, Zuberi Daniyal, Nguyen Quynh C
UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7440, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Nov;69(10):1452-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.030. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
Using a cross-national comparative approach, we examined the influence of health insurance on U.S. immigrant versus non-immigrant disparities in access to primary health care. With data from the 2002/2003 Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health, we gathered evidence using three approaches: 1) we compared health care access among insured and uninsured immigrants and non-immigrants within the U.S.; 2) we contrasted these results with health care access disparities between immigrants and non-immigrants in Canada, a country with universal health care; and 3) we conducted a novel direct comparison of health care access among insured and uninsured U.S. immigrants with Canadian immigrants (all of whom are insured). Outcomes investigated were self-reported unmet medical needs and lack of a regular doctor. Logistic regression models controlled for age, sex, nonwhite status, marital status, education, employment, and self-rated health. In the U.S., odds of unmet medical needs of insured immigrants were similar to those of insured non-immigrants but far greater for uninsured immigrants. The effect of health insurance was even more striking for lack of regular doctor. Within Canada, disparities between immigrants and non-immigrants were similar in magnitude to disparities seen among insured Americans. For both outcomes, direct comparisons of U.S. and Canada revealed significant differences between uninsured American immigrants and Canadian immigrants, but not between insured Americans and Canadians, stratified by nativity. Findings suggest health care insurance is a critical cause of differences between immigrants and non-immigrants in access to primary care, lending robust support for the expansion of health insurance coverage in the U.S. This study also highlights the usefulness of cross-national comparisons for establishing alternative counterfactuals in studies of disparities in health and health care.
我们采用跨国比较方法,研究了医疗保险对美国移民与非移民在获得初级医疗保健方面差异的影响。利用2002/2003年加拿大/美国健康联合调查的数据,我们通过三种方法收集了证据:1)我们比较了美国境内有保险和无保险的移民与非移民之间的医疗保健可及性;2)我们将这些结果与加拿大(一个拥有全民医疗保健的国家)移民与非移民之间的医疗保健可及性差异进行了对比;3)我们对有保险和无保险的美国移民与加拿大移民(他们全部都有保险)之间的医疗保健可及性进行了新颖的直接比较。所调查的结果是自我报告的未满足的医疗需求和没有固定医生。逻辑回归模型对年龄、性别、非白人身份、婚姻状况、教育程度、就业情况和自我评定的健康状况进行了控制。在美国,有保险的移民未满足医疗需求的几率与有保险的非移民相似,但无保险的移民则要高得多。对于没有固定医生这一情况,医疗保险的影响更为显著。在加拿大,移民与非移民之间的差异程度与有保险的美国人之间的差异相似。对于这两个结果,按出生地分层对美国和加拿大进行的直接比较显示,无保险的美国移民与加拿大移民之间存在显著差异,但有保险的美国人和加拿大人之间没有差异。研究结果表明,医疗保险是移民与非移民在获得初级医疗保健方面存在差异的一个关键原因,有力地支持了美国扩大医疗保险覆盖范围。这项研究还强调了跨国比较在建立健康和医疗保健差异研究中的替代反事实方面的有用性。