Shah Vibhuti, Taddio Anna, Rieder Michael J
Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Clin Ther. 2009;31 Suppl 2:S104-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.001.
Immunization is the most common cause of iatrogenic pain in childhood. Despite the availability of various analgesics to manage vaccine injection pain, they have not been incorporated into clinical practice. To date, no systematic review has been published on the effectiveness of pharmacologic and combined interventions for reducing injection pain.
The objectives of this article were to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of various pharmacologic and combined interventions for reducing the pain experienced by children during immunization.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs pertaining to pharmacologic and combined interventions to reduce injection pain in children 0 to 18 years of age using validated child self-reported pain or observer-reported assessments of child pain and distress. We included trials that (1) investigated the effects of pharmacologic interventions (ie, topical local anesthetics, sweet-tasting solutions, vapocoolants, and oral analgesics [acetaminophen or ibuprofen]); (2) compared 2 different analgesic interventions; and (3) evaluated combinations of >or= 2 analgesic interventions, including breastfeeding. Meta-analyses were performed using a fixed-effects model.
Thirty-two studies, involving 3856 infants and children 2 weeks to 15 years of age, were included in this systematic review; 23 of these trials were included in meta-analyses. Ten trials, including 1156 infants and children, evaluated topical local anesthetics. In a meta-analysis of 2 trials, including 276 children, child self-reported pain ratings were lower in children who received topical local anesthetics than in those who received a placebo. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was -0.25 (95% CI, -0.49 to -0.01; P = 0.04). The use of topical local anesthetics was associated with less pain than was placebo in 4 trials (527 infants) based on the difference between Modified Behavioral Pain Scale scores (range, 0-10) before and after vaccination: the weighted mean difference (WMD) was -0.79 (95% CI, -1.10 to -0.48; P < 0.001) and the SMD was -0.43 (95% CI, -0.60 to -0.26; P = 0.001). Observer-rated pain, using visual analog scale (VAS) scores (range, 0-100 mm), was significantly lower (WMD, -16.56 mm; 95% CI, -22.11 to -11.01; P < 0.001; and SMD, -0.75; 95% CI, -1.00 to -0.49; P < 0.001). The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent 1 child from having clinically significant pain, measured using the Faces Pain Scale (FPS; score, >-3), was 3.7 (95% CI, 2.5 to 7.7) from 1 study. Eleven trials (1452 infants and children) evaluated sweet-tasting solutions. In a meta-analysis of 6 studies (665 infants), administration of sucrose with or without non-nutritive sucking (NNS; use of a pacifier) was associated with less pain than no intervention or sterile water with or without NNS; the SMD was -0.56 (95% CI, -0.72 to -0.40; P < 0.001). Total cry duration was lower in infants who received sucrose than in those who received sterile water (WMD, -9.41 sec; 95% CI, -13.18 to -5.64; P < 0.001; and SMD, -0.43; 95% CI, -0.61 to -0.25; P < 0.001). The NNT to prevent 1 child from having clinically significant pain, using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (score, >3), was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.5). In 3 trials that evaluated sweet-tasting solutions longitudinally, administration of sucrose or glucose (vs sterile water, with or without NNS) was associated with reduced pain based on cry duration or the University of Wisconsin Children's Hospital Pain Scale (all, P < 0.05). Data were pooled for 2 studies conducted in 100 children who received a spray with a vapocoolant or placebo at the injection site before the procedure. Child self-rated pain (4-point scale) was lower in the group treated with the vapo-coolant (SMD, -0.43; 95% CI, -0.83 to -0.02; P = 0.04); significant heterogeneity was reported for this outcome (chi(2) = 5.51; P = 0.02; I(2) = 82%). In 2 studies (117 children), no significant difference was found between vapocoolants and typical care (no treatment) based on child self-reports; significant heterogeneity was reported for this outcome (chi(2) = 9.89; P = 0.02; I(2) = 90%). None of the studies identified in the literature search evaluated oral analgesics (acetaminophen or ibuprofen). Four studies (318 infants and children) compared 2 different analgesic interventions; there was insufficient evidence to suggest superiority of 1 intervention over another. Combinations of >or=2 analgesic interventions were more effective than the individual interventions used alone. Child self-reported pain ratings were combined for 4 studies (350 children); the SMD was -0.52 (95% CI, -0.73 to -0.30; P = 0.001). Data on cry duration were pooled for 3 studies (229 infants and children); the WMD was -18.87 seconds (95% CI, -32.05 to -5.69; P = 0.005). Parent-rated child pain (VAS) scores were combined for 3 studies (365 infants and children); the WMD was -15.66 mm (95% CI, -19.74 to -11.57; P < 0.001). Nurse- or physician-rated child pain (VAS) scores were combined for 3 studies (368 infants and children); the WMD was -17.85 mm (95% CI, -21.43 to -14.28; P < 0.001). In a meta-analysis of 4 studies (474 infants), infants who were breastfed before, during, and after the procedure had less pain than did those who were not breastfed (SMD, -2.03; 95% CI, -2.26 to -1.80; P < 0.001). A meta-analysis of 3 studies (344 infants) found a shorter cry duration for infants who were breastfed than for those who were not breastfed (WMD, -38.00 sec; 95% CI, -42.27 to -33.73; P < 0.001; and SMD, -2.00; 95% CI, -2.27 to -1.73; P < 0.001). The NNT to prevent 1 infant from having clinically significant pain, using the Facial Pain Rating Scale (pain vs no pain), was 7.7 (95% CI, 4.5 to 25.0) from 1 study.
Topical local anesthetics, sweet-tasting solutions, and combined analgesic interventions, including breastfeeding, were associated with reduced pain during childhood immunizations and should be recommended for use in clinical practice.
免疫接种是儿童医源性疼痛最常见的原因。尽管有多种镇痛药可用于处理疫苗注射疼痛,但它们尚未被纳入临床实践。迄今为止,尚未发表关于药物及联合干预措施减轻注射疼痛有效性的系统评价。
本文旨在评估各种药物及联合干预措施减轻儿童免疫接种时疼痛的有效性和耐受性。
检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL以及Cochrane对照试验中心注册库,以识别关于药物及联合干预措施减轻0至18岁儿童注射疼痛的随机对照试验(RCT)和半随机对照试验,采用经过验证的儿童自我报告疼痛或观察者报告的儿童疼痛与痛苦评估。我们纳入了以下试验:(1)研究药物干预措施(即局部外用麻醉剂、甜味溶液、冷感剂和口服镇痛药[对乙酰氨基酚或布洛芬])的效果;(2)比较两种不同的镇痛干预措施;(3)评估两种或两种以上镇痛干预措施的联合应用,包括母乳喂养。采用固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。
本系统评价纳入了32项研究,涉及3856名2周龄至15岁的婴幼儿及儿童;其中23项试验纳入了荟萃分析。10项试验,包括1156名婴幼儿及儿童,评估了局部外用麻醉剂。在一项纳入276名儿童的2项试验的荟萃分析中,接受局部外用麻醉剂的儿童自我报告的疼痛评分低于接受安慰剂的儿童。标准化均数差(SMD)为-0.25(95%CI,-0.49至-0.01;P = 0.04)。基于疫苗接种前后改良行为疼痛量表评分(范围为0至10)的差异,4项试验(527名婴儿)中使用局部外用麻醉剂的疼痛程度低于安慰剂:加权均数差(WMD)为-0.79(95%CI,-1.10至-0.48;P < 0.001),SMD为-0.43(95%CI,-0.60至-0.26;P = 0.001)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分(范围为0至100 mm)的观察者评定疼痛显著更低(WMD,-16.56 mm;95%CI,-22.11至-11.01;P < 0.001;SMD,-0.75;95%CI,-1.00至-0.49;P < 0.001)。一项研究中,使用面部疼痛量表(FPS;评分>3)预防1名儿童出现具有临床意义疼痛所需的治疗人数(NNT)为3.7(95%CI,2.5至7.7)。11项试验(14,52名婴幼儿及儿童)评估了甜味溶液。在一项纳入6项研究(665名婴儿)的荟萃分析中,给予蔗糖(无论有无非营养性吸吮[NNS;使用安抚奶嘴])比不干预或给予无菌水(无论有无NNS)疼痛程度更低;SMD为-0.56(95%CI,-0.72至-0.40;P < 0.001)。接受蔗糖的婴儿的总哭闹持续时间低于接受无菌水的婴儿(WMD,-9.41秒;95%CI,-13.18至-5.64;P < 0.001;SMD,-0.43;95%CI,-0.61至-0.25;P < 0.001)。使用新生儿婴儿疼痛量表(评分>3)预防1名儿童出现具有临床意义疼痛所需的NNT为1.4(95%CI,1.0至2.5)。在3项纵向评估甜味溶液的试验中,给予蔗糖或葡萄糖(与无菌水相比,无论有无NNS)基于哭闹持续时间或威斯康星大学儿童医院疼痛量表显示疼痛减轻(均P < 0.05)。对在100名儿童中进行的2项研究的数据进行汇总,这些儿童在操作前在注射部位接受了冷感剂喷雾或安慰剂。接受冷感剂治疗组的儿童自我评定疼痛(4分制)更低(SMD,-0.43;95%CI,-0.83至-0.02;P = 0.04);该结果报告存在显著异质性(χ² = 5.51;P = 0.02;I² = 82%)。在2项研究(117名儿童)中,基于儿童自我报告,冷感剂与常规护理(不治疗)之间未发现显著差异;该结果报告存在显著异质性(χ² = 9.89;P = 0.02;I² = 90%)。文献检索中未发现评估口服镇痛药(对乙酰氨基酚或布洛芬)的研究。4项研究(318名婴幼儿及儿童)比较了两种不同的镇痛干预措施;没有足够的证据表明一种干预措施优于另一种。两种或两种以上镇痛干预措施的联合应用比单独使用个体干预措施更有效。4项研究(350名儿童)的儿童自我报告疼痛评分进行了汇总;SMD为-0.52(95%CI,-0.73至-0.30;P = 0.001)。3项研究(229名婴幼儿及儿童)的哭闹持续时间数据进行了汇总;WMD为-18.87秒(95%CI,-32.05至-5.69;P = 0.005)。3项研究(365名婴幼儿及儿童)的家长评定儿童疼痛(VAS)评分进行了汇总;WMD为-15.66 mm(95%CI,-19.74至-11.57;P < 0.001)。3项研究(368名婴幼儿及儿童)的护士或医生评定儿童疼痛(VAS)评分进行了汇总;WMD为-17.85 mm(95%CI,-21.43至-14.28;P < 0.001)。在一项纳入4项研究(474名婴儿)的荟萃分析中,表示操作前、操作期间及操作后进行母乳喂养的婴儿比未进行母乳喂养的婴儿疼痛程度更低(SMD,-2.03;95%CI,-2.26至-1.80;P < 0.001)。一项纳入3项研究(344名婴儿)的荟萃分析发现,母乳喂养的婴儿哭闹持续时间比未母乳喂养的婴儿更短(WMD,-38.00秒;95%CI,-42.27至-33.73;P < 0.001;SMD,-2.00;95%CI,-2.27至-1.73;P < 0.001)。一项研究中,使用面部疼痛评定量表(疼痛与无疼痛)预防1名婴儿出现具有临床意义疼痛所需的NNT为7.7(95%CI,4.5至25.0)。
局部外用麻醉剂、甜味溶液以及包括母乳喂养在内的联合镇痛干预措施与减轻儿童免疫接种时的疼痛相关,应推荐在临床实践中使用。