World Health Organization Country Office for Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Acta Trop. 2010 Feb;113(2):105-13. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
Plasmodium vivax is the second most important cause of morbidity in Ethiopia. There is, however, little information on P. vivax resistance to chloroquine and chloroquine plus primaquine treatment although these drugs have been used as the first line treatment for over 50 years. We assessed the efficacy of standard chloroquine and chloroquine plus primaquine treatment for P. vivax infections in a randomized open-label comparative study in Debre Zeit and Nazareth in East Shoa, Ethiopia. A total of 290 patients with microscopically confirmed P. vivax malaria who presented to the outpatient settings of the two laboratory centers were enrolled: 145 patients were randomized to receive CQ and 145 to receive CQ+PQ treatment. Participants were followed-up for 28-157 days according to the WHO procedures. There were 12 (6.5%) lost to follow-up patients and 9 (3.1%) withdrawals. In all, 96% (277/290) of patients were analysed at day 28. Baseline characteristics were similar in all treatment groups. In all, 98.6% (275/277) of patients had cleared their parasitemia on day 3 with no difference in mean parasite clearance time between regimens (48.34+/-17.68, 50.67+/-15.70 h for the CQ and CQ+PQ group, respectively, P=0.25). The cumulative incidence of therapeutic failure at day 28 by a life-table analysis method was 5.76% (95% CI: 2.2-14.61) and 0.75% (95% CI: 0.11-5.2%) in the CQ and CQ+PQ group, respectively (P=0.19). The relapse rate was 8% (9/108) for the CQ group and 3% (4/132) for the comparison group (P=0.07). The cumulative risk of relapse at day 157 by a life-table method was 61.8% (95% CI: 20.1-98.4%) in the CQ group, compared with 26.3% (95% CI: 7.5-29.4%) in the CQ+PQ group (P=0.0038). The study confirms the emergence of CQ and PQ resistance/treatment failure in P. vivax malaria in Ethiopia. Although treatment failures were detected, they were similar between the treatment groups. We recommend regular monitoring and periodic evaluation of the efficacy of these antimalarial drugs in systematically selected sentinel sites to detect further development of resistance and to make timely national antimalarial drug policy changes.
间日疟原虫是埃塞俄比亚第二大发病率原因。尽管这些药物已经使用了 50 多年,但对于氯喹和氯喹加伯氨喹治疗的间日疟原虫耐药性,几乎没有信息。我们在埃塞俄比亚东绍阿的德布雷塞特和纳扎雷特的两家实验室中心进行了一项随机开放标签比较研究,评估了标准氯喹和氯喹加伯氨喹治疗间日疟原虫感染的疗效。共有 290 名经显微镜确认患有间日疟的患者在两家实验室中心的门诊就诊,其中 145 名患者被随机分配接受 CQ 治疗,145 名患者接受 CQ+PQ 治疗。根据世界卫生组织的程序,参与者随访了 28-157 天。共有 12 名(6.5%)患者失访,9 名(3.1%)患者退出。共有 290 名患者中的 277 名(96%)在第 28 天进行了分析。所有治疗组的基线特征相似。所有患者在第 3 天的寄生虫清除率均为 98.6%(275/277),两种方案的平均寄生虫清除时间无差异(48.34+/-17.68,50.67+/-15.70 小时,CQ 和 CQ+PQ 组,分别,P=0.25)。通过生命表分析方法,第 28 天治疗失败的累积发生率为 5.76%(95%CI:2.2-14.61)和 0.75%(95%CI:0.11-5.2%),分别为 CQ 和 CQ+PQ 组(P=0.19)。CQ 组的复发率为 8%(9/108),对照组为 3%(4/132)(P=0.07)。通过生命表法,CQ 组第 157 天的累积复发风险为 61.8%(95%CI:20.1-98.4%),而 CQ+PQ 组为 26.3%(95%CI:7.5-29.4%)(P=0.0038)。该研究证实了埃塞俄比亚间日疟原虫对氯喹和伯氨喹的耐药性/治疗失败的出现。尽管检测到治疗失败,但两组之间相似。我们建议在系统选择的哨点定期监测和定期评估这些抗疟药物的疗效,以发现耐药性的进一步发展,并及时做出国家抗疟药物政策改变。