Life and Health Science Research Institute, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Lab Anim. 2010 Apr;44(2):88-103. doi: 10.1258/la.2009.009044. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
The use of group-housed rodents in many fields of biomedical research imposes a need to identify individuals in a cage. Few studies have been designed to assess possible negative effects of identification methods of newborn mice on their development and wellbeing. In the present study, three different identification methods were applied to newborn C57BL/6J mice on postnatal day (pnd) 5 (toe clipping, toe tattoo ink puncture and subcutaneous implantation of a small transponder). All identification methods used proved to be effective for long-term marking of individual animals. Newborn mice showed the least reaction to toe clipping followed by toe tattoo ink puncture and transponder implantation was the most distressful individual identification procedure in newborn mice. Importantly, clipped toe tissue proved to be enough for genotyping purposes. No overall consistent differences in somatic and neurological reflex development during the postnatal period were shown as a result of the newborn individual identification procedures used. Further, none of the methods interfered significantly with the adult animals' general normal behaviour (e.g. ability to move, grasp, climb) and sensory-motor functions as assessed with a simplified SHIRPA battery of tests, as well as Rotarod and Elevated Plus Maze tests. Postmortem thymus and adrenal gland weights gave no indication of chronic stress as a consequence of the identification method. We conclude that toe clipping might even be advisable in newborn mice at a very young age, when genotyping is needed. Toe tattoo ink puncture is also a good identification method for newborn mice and transponder implantation should only be used in older newborns or applied at weaning.
在许多生物医学研究领域,使用群体饲养的啮齿动物需要对笼中的个体进行识别。很少有研究旨在评估新生小鼠识别方法对其发育和健康的潜在负面影响。在本研究中,在出生后第 5 天(趾夹、趾纹墨水穿刺和皮下植入小型 Transponder)对新生 C57BL/6J 小鼠应用了三种不同的识别方法。所有用于长期标记个体动物的识别方法都被证明是有效的。新生小鼠对趾夹的反应最小,其次是趾纹墨水穿刺,而 Transponder 植入是新生小鼠最痛苦的个体识别程序。重要的是,剪下的趾组织足以进行基因分型。由于使用了新生个体识别程序,在出生后的发育过程中,没有显示出身体和神经反射发育的总体一致差异。进一步,没有一种方法对成年动物的一般正常行为(例如移动、抓握、攀爬)和感觉运动功能产生显著干扰,如用简化的 SHIRPA 测试组以及旋转棒和高架十字迷宫测试评估的那样。死后的胸腺和肾上腺重量没有表明由于识别方法而导致慢性应激。我们得出结论,当需要基因分型时,甚至在新生小鼠非常年幼时,趾夹可能是可取的。趾纹墨水穿刺也是新生小鼠的一种很好的识别方法,而 Transponder 植入应仅用于年龄较大的新生小鼠或在断奶时应用。