Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.
Endocr Pract. 2010 May-Jun;16(3):408-18. doi: 10.4158/EP09275.OR.
To determine the effect of a year-long, multifaceted diabetes curriculum on the knowledge of internal medicine residents.
In this controlled, prospective study, diabetes knowledge assessment was performed with a published questionnaire to measure baseline knowledge, determine change in knowledge at 1 year, and compare resident knowledge with attending knowledge. The questionnaire was administered to residents at the beginning and end of the 2007-2008 academic year. As controls, internal medicine attendings and diabetes care providers were also given the questionnaire. The educational curriculum over the course of the year included order sets, pocket cards, lectures, and rounds. Although all residents were exposed to the education intervention, teaching targeted the postgraduate year (PGY)-1 residents.
Of 91 participating residents, 85 (93%) completed at least 1 questionnaire for a total of 103 questionnaires. Baseline and year-end assessments were completed by 18 residents. Among 25 attendings, 22 (88%) completed questionnaires. Eleven diabetes care providers participated. PGY-3 residents scored 72 +/- 10% and PGY-2 residents scored 72 +/- 8%, which was significantly greater than the PGY-1 residents' score of 62 +/- 12% (P = .004 and P = .006, respectively). Lectures were associated with knowledge improvement over time (P = .04). The mean attending score of 67 +/- 13% was not significantly different from the residents' scores. Diabetes care providers had the highest score (92 +/- 7%).
Inpatient diabetes education targeted to PGY-1 residents modestly improves resident knowledge, especially in the targeted population. Traditional educational methods may not be adequate, and improved education is needed for trainees and attendings to provide optimal diabetes care. Strategies to improve resident education may include developing more comprehensive lectures that address fundamental concepts, focusing on all PGY levels, frequent consultation with diabetologists, and case-based discussions.
确定为期一年的多方面糖尿病课程对内科住院医师知识的影响。
在这项对照前瞻性研究中,采用已发表的问卷对糖尿病知识进行评估,以衡量基线知识,确定 1 年后知识的变化,并将住院医师的知识与主治医生的知识进行比较。问卷在 2007-2008 学年开始和结束时分发给住院医师。作为对照,也向内科主治医生和糖尿病护理人员发放了问卷。该课程在整个学年包括医嘱集、袖珍卡片、讲座和查房。尽管所有住院医师都接受了教育干预,但教学以住院医师 1 年级(PGY-1)为目标。
91 名参与研究的住院医师中,有 85 名(93%)至少完成了 1 份问卷,共完成了 103 份问卷。18 名住院医师完成了基线和期末评估。25 名主治医生中,有 22 名(88%)完成了问卷。11 名糖尿病护理人员参与了调查。PGY-3 住院医师的得分为 72 +/- 10%,PGY-2 住院医师的得分为 72 +/- 8%,明显高于 PGY-1 住院医师的 62 +/- 12%(P =.004 和 P =.006)。讲座与知识的随时间推移而改善有关(P =.04)。主治医生的平均得分 67 +/- 13%与住院医师的得分无显著差异。糖尿病护理人员的得分最高(92 +/- 7%)。
针对 PGY-1 住院医师的住院糖尿病教育适度提高了住院医师的知识水平,尤其是针对目标人群。传统的教育方法可能不够充分,需要为住院医师和主治医生提供更好的糖尿病教育。改善住院医师教育的策略可能包括开发更全面的讲座,涵盖基本概念,关注所有住院医师年级,与糖尿病专家频繁咨询,以及基于案例的讨论。