Department of Acute and Chronic Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010 May-Jun;25(3):207-20. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181cc79be.
This systematic review of recent randomized trials was conducted to determine if cardiovascular nursing interventions improve outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or heart failure.
Randomized controlled trials of nursing interventions in patients with CAD or heart failure published from January 2000 to December 2008 were eligible. Pilot studies and trials with greater than 25% attrition with no intention-to-treat analyses were excluded. Study characteristics and results were extracted and trials were graded for methodological quality.
A total of 2,039 citations from electronic databases were identified; 55 articles were eligible for inclusion. The primary intervention strategy was education plus behavioral counseling and support (65% of interventions) using a combination of intervention modes. More than half of the trials (57%) reported statistically significant results in at least 1 outcome of blood pressure, lipids, physical activity, dietary intake, cigarette smoking, weight loss, healthcare utilization, mortality, quality of life, and psychosocial outcomes. However, there were no consistent relationships observed between intervention characteristics and the effects of interventions. The average measure of study quality was 2.8 (possible range, 0-4, with higher score equaling higher quality).
Most trials reviewed demonstrated a beneficial impact of nursing interventions for secondary prevention in patients with CAD or heart failure. However, the optimal combination of intervention components, including strategy, mode of delivery, frequency, and duration, remains unknown. Establishing consensus regarding outcome measures, inclusion of adequate, representative samples, along with cost-effectiveness analyses will promote translation and adoption of cost-effective nursing interventions.
本系统评价最近的随机试验旨在确定心血管护理干预是否能改善冠心病(CAD)和/或心力衰竭患者的结局。
符合条件的研究为 2000 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月发表的冠心病或心力衰竭患者护理干预的随机对照试验。排除了试点研究和失访率大于 25%且无意向治疗分析的试验。提取研究特征和结果,并对试验进行方法学质量分级。
从电子数据库中识别出 2039 条引文;55 篇文章符合纳入标准。主要干预策略是在教育的基础上加上行为咨询和支持(65%的干预措施),采用多种干预模式。超过一半的试验(57%)报告了至少 1 项血压、血脂、体力活动、饮食摄入、吸烟、体重减轻、医疗保健利用、死亡率、生活质量和心理社会结局的统计学显著结果。然而,干预特征与干预效果之间没有观察到一致的关系。研究质量的平均衡量标准为 2.8(可能范围为 0-4,得分越高表示质量越高)。
大多数综述试验表明,护理干预对 CAD 或心力衰竭患者的二级预防具有有益影响。然而,干预成分的最佳组合,包括策略、传递模式、频率和持续时间,仍不清楚。就结果测量、包括具有代表性的足够样本以及成本效益分析达成共识,将促进具有成本效益的护理干预的转化和采用。