University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing, USA.
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Mar;66(3):673-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05216.x.
This paper is a description of a method to develop and conduct a customized psycho-educational intervention fidelity assessment as part of pilot work for an efficacy study. A tool designed to assess treatment fidelity to a psycho-education intervention for patients with end-stage renal disease and their surrogate decision makers, Sharing the Patient's Illness Representations to Increase Trust, is presented as an illustration.
Despite the specificity and idiosyncrasy of individual interventions and the call to systematically evaluate treatment fidelity, how to accomplish this goal has not been clarified. Tools to adequately measure treatment fidelity are lacking.
We developed the Sharing the Patient's Illness Representations to Increase Trust Treatment Fidelity Assessment tool by identifying elements that were idiosyncratic to the intervention and those that could be adapted from existing tools. The tool has four components: overall adherence to the intervention content elements; pacing of the intervention delivery; overall dyad responsiveness; and, overall quality index of intervention delivery. The study was undertaken between 2006 and 2008.
Inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.80 to 0.87 for the four components. The tool showed utility in training and monitoring, such as detecting unplanned content elements delivered and the use of proscribed communication behaviours.
Psycho-educational interventions are one of the most common types of nursing interventions worldwide. Use of fidelity assessment tools customized to the individual interventions may enhance systematic evaluation of training and monitoring treatment fidelity.
本文描述了一种开发和实施定制心理教育干预一致性评估的方法,作为一项疗效研究的试点工作的一部分。本文设计了一个工具来评估针对终末期肾病患者及其替代决策人的心理教育干预的治疗一致性,以“分享患者的疾病观念以增强信任”为例进行说明。
尽管干预措施具有特异性和独特性,并且呼吁系统地评估治疗一致性,但如何实现这一目标尚未明确。缺乏足够测量治疗一致性的工具。
我们通过确定干预措施特有的元素和可以从现有工具中改编的元素,开发了“分享患者的疾病观念以增强信任治疗一致性评估工具”。该工具有四个部分:对干预内容元素的总体遵循情况;干预交付的节奏;整体对偶反应性;以及干预交付的整体质量指数。该研究于 2006 年至 2008 年进行。
四个部分的组内信度范围为 0.80 至 0.87。该工具在培训和监测方面具有实用性,例如检测未计划的内容元素交付和使用禁止的沟通行为。
心理教育干预是全球最常见的护理干预类型之一。使用针对个体干预措施定制的一致性评估工具可以增强对培训和监测治疗一致性的系统评估。