Suppr超能文献

一项为期六个月的度洛西汀治疗纤维肌痛的双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验。

A six-month double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of duloxetine for the treatment of fibromyalgia.

机构信息

Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN, USA;

出版信息

Int J Gen Med. 2008 Nov 30;1:91-102. doi: 10.2147/ijgm.s3979.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assess the efficacy of duloxetine 60/120 mg (N = 162) once daily compared with placebo (N = 168) in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia, during six months of treatment.

METHODS

This was a phase-III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study assessing the efficacy and safety of duloxetine.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between treatment groups on the co-primary efficacy outcome measures, change in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) average pain severity from baseline to endpoint (P = 0.053) and the Patient's Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) at endpoint (P = 0.073). Duloxetine-treated patients improved significantly more than placebo-treated patients on the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire pain score, BPI least pain score and average interference score, Clinical Global Impressions of Severity scale, area under the curve of pain relief, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory mental fatigue dimension, Beck Depression Inventory-II total score, and 36-item Short Form Health Survey mental component summary and mental health score. Nausea was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event in the duloxetine group. Overall discontinuation rates were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although duloxetine 60/120 mg/day failed to demonstrate significant improvement over placebo on the co-primary outcome measures, in this supportive study, duloxetine demonstrated significant improvement compared with placebo on numerous secondary measures.

摘要

目的

评估度洛西汀 60/120mg(N=162)每日一次与安慰剂(N=168)治疗纤维肌痛患者的疗效,治疗时间为 6 个月。

方法

这是一项 III 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,评估度洛西汀的疗效和安全性。

结果

在主要疗效终点指标上,治疗组之间没有显著差异,即从基线到终点时简明疼痛量表(BPI)平均疼痛严重程度的变化(P=0.053)和终点时患者总体印象改善(PGI-I)(P=0.073)。与安慰剂组相比,度洛西汀治疗组患者在纤维肌痛影响问卷疼痛评分、BPI 最小疼痛评分和平均干扰评分、临床总体印象严重程度量表、疼痛缓解曲线下面积、多维疲劳量表精神疲劳维度、贝克抑郁量表 II 总分以及 36 项简明健康调查问卷心理成分综合评分和心理健康评分方面有显著改善。度洛西汀组最常见的治疗后不良事件是恶心。两组的总体停药率相似。

结论

尽管度洛西汀 60/120mg/天在主要疗效终点指标上未能显示出比安慰剂有显著改善,但在这项支持性研究中,度洛西汀在许多次要指标上与安慰剂相比有显著改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1f7/2840539/b4b6d7e3fb0a/ijgm-1-91f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验