Sinkovics Joseph G
The University of South Florida College of Medicine, St. Joseph Hospital's Cancer Institute, Affiliated with the H. L. Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33607-6307, USA.
Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2010 Dec;57(4):253-347. doi: 10.1556/AMicr.57.2010.4.2.
In leukemic mice, the native host's explicit and well-defined immune reactions to the leukemia virus (a strong exogenous antigen) and to leukemia cells (pretending in their native hosts to be protected "self" elements) are extinguished and replaced in GvHD (graft-versus-host disease) by those of the immunocompetent donor cells. In many cases, the GvHD-inducer donors display genetically encoded resistance to the leukemia virus. In human patients only antileukemia and anti-tumor cell immune reactions are mobilized; thus, patients are deprived of immune reactions to a strong exogenous antigen (the elusive human leukemia-sarcoma retroviruses). The innate and adaptive immune systems of mice have to sustain the immunosuppressive effects of leukemia-inducing retroviruses. Human patients due to the lack of leukemiainducing retroviral pathogens (if they exist, they have not as yet been discovered), escape such immunological downgrading. After studying leukemogenic retroviruses in murine and feline (and other mammalian) hosts, it is very difficult to dismiss retroviral etiology for human leukemias and sarcomas. Since no characterized and thus recognized leukemogenic-sarcomagenic retroviral agents are being isolated from the vast majority of human leukemias-sarcomas, the treatment for these conditions in mice and in human patients vastly differ. It is immunological and biological modalities (alpha interferons; vaccines; adoptive lymphocyte therapy) that dominate the treatment of murine leukemias, whereas combination chemotherapy remains the main remission-inducing agent in human leukemias-lymphomas and sarcomas (as humanized monoclonal antibodies and immunotoxins move in). Yet, in this apparently different backgrounds in Mus and Homo, GvHD, as a treatment modality, appears to work well in both hosts, by replacing the hosts' anti-leukemia and anti-tumor immune faculties with those of the donor. The clinical application of GvHD in the treatment of human leukemias-lymphomas and malignant solid tumors remains a force worthy of pursuit, refinement and strengthening. Graft engineering and modifications of the inner immunological environment of the recipient host by the activation or administration of tumor memory T cells, selected Treg cells and natural killer (NKT) cell classes and cytokines, and the improved pharmacotherapy of GvHD without reducing its antitumor efficacy, will raise the value of GvHD to the higher ranks of the effective antitumor immunotherapeutical measures. Clinical interventions of HCT/HSCT (hematopoietic cell/stem cell transplants) are now applicable to an extended spectrum of malignant diseases in human patients, being available to elderly patients, who receive non-myeloablative conditioning, are re-enforced by post-transplant donor lymphocyte (NK cell and immune T cell) infusions and post-transplant vaccinations, and the donor cells may derive from engineered grafts, or from cord blood with reduced GvHD, but increased GvL/GvT-inducing capabilities (graft-versus leukemia/tumor). Post-transplant T cell transfusions are possible only if selected leukemia antigen-specific T cell clones are available. In verbatim quotation: "Ultimately, advances in separation of GvT from GvHD will further enhance the potential of allogeneic HCT as a curative treatment for hematological malignancies" (Rezvani, A.R. and Storb, R.F., Journal of Autoimmunity 30:172-179, 2008 (see in the text)). It may be added: for cure, a combination of the GvL/T effects with new targeted therapeutic modalities, as elaborated on in this article, will be necessary.
在白血病小鼠中,天然宿主对白血病病毒(一种强烈的外源性抗原)和白血病细胞(在其天然宿主中被视为受保护的“自身”成分)的明确且定义清晰的免疫反应被消除,并在移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)中被具有免疫活性的供体细胞的反应所取代。在许多情况下,引发GvHD的供体表现出对白血病病毒的遗传编码抗性。在人类患者中,仅调动了抗白血病和抗肿瘤细胞的免疫反应;因此,患者被剥夺了对一种强烈外源性抗原(难以捉摸的人类白血病 - 肉瘤逆转录病毒)的免疫反应。小鼠的先天和适应性免疫系统必须承受白血病诱导逆转录病毒的免疫抑制作用。人类患者由于缺乏白血病诱导逆转录病毒病原体(如果它们存在,尚未被发现),从而避免了这种免疫功能下降。在研究了鼠类、猫科动物(以及其他哺乳动物)宿主中的致白血病逆转录病毒后,很难排除逆转录病毒病因与人类白血病和肉瘤的关联。由于从绝大多数人类白血病 - 肉瘤中未分离出特征明确且因此被认可的致白血病 - 肉瘤逆转录病毒制剂,小鼠和人类患者针对这些病症的治疗方法有很大差异。在小鼠白血病治疗中占主导地位的是免疫和生物疗法(α干扰素;疫苗;过继性淋巴细胞疗法),而联合化疗仍然是人类白血病 - 淋巴瘤和肉瘤(随着人源化单克隆抗体和免疫毒素的应用)的主要缓解诱导剂。然而,在小鼠和人类这种明显不同的背景下,作为一种治疗方式,GvHD似乎在两种宿主中都能很好地发挥作用,通过用供体的抗白血病和抗肿瘤免疫能力取代宿主的这些能力。GvHD在治疗人类白血病 - 淋巴瘤和恶性实体瘤方面的临床应用仍然是一股值得追求、完善和强化的力量。通过激活或给予肿瘤记忆T细胞、选定的调节性T细胞和自然杀伤(NKT)细胞类别及细胞因子来进行移植物工程改造和受体宿主内部免疫环境的修饰,以及在不降低其抗肿瘤疗效的情况下改进GvHD的药物治疗,将使GvHD的价值提升到更高水平的有效抗肿瘤免疫治疗措施中。造血细胞/干细胞移植(HCT/HSCT)的临床干预现在适用于人类患者中更广泛的恶性疾病范围,可供老年患者使用,这些患者接受非清髓性预处理,通过移植后供体淋巴细胞(NK细胞和免疫T细胞)输注和移植后疫苗接种得到加强,并且供体细胞可以来自工程化移植物,或来自具有降低的GvHD但增强的GvL/GvT诱导能力(移植物抗白血病/肿瘤)的脐血。仅当有选定的白血病抗原特异性T细胞克隆时,移植后T细胞输注才有可能。直接引用:“最终,将GvT与GvHD分离的进展将进一步提高异基因HCT作为血液系统恶性肿瘤治愈性治疗的潜力”(Rezvani,A.R.和Storb,R.F.,《自身免疫杂志》30:172 - 179,2008(见文中))。还可以补充:为了治愈,如本文所述,将GvL/T效应与新的靶向治疗方式相结合将是必要的。