Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda County Medical Center-Highland Campus, Oakland, CA 94602, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.12.015. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
We evaluate the frequency of emergency department (ED) ultrasonographic probe contamination and the bacterial species involved and evaluate probe cleaning and disinfection methods.
This was a 3-part observational cross-sectional study. Surveillance cultures were taken of linear and curvilinear probes on 3 ultrasonographic machines between patient encounters. Cultures of uncovered probes were taken immediately after scanning of skin and soft tissue infections. After experimental probe contamination with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), we assessed 3-step disinfection by sequential cleaning with a dry towel, saline solution-moistened towel, and quaternary ammonia germicidal wipe and 1-step disinfection by germicidal wipe alone. Cultures were obtained by applying the probe to a blood agar plate.
In part 1, of 164 surveillance cultures obtained from 6 probes on 29 sampling days during 11 months, 111 (67%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 60% to 74%) grew normal skin flora or environmental flora, 52 had no growth (32%; 95% CI 25% to 39%), and 2 (1.2%; 95% CI 0.3% to 4.3%) grew a clinically important pathogen. In part 2, 14 of 20 (70%; 95% CI 48% to 85%) cultures taken after skin and soft tissue infection scanning produced heavy growth of a clinically important pathogen, including 13 S aureus (5 MRSA). In part 3, cleaning with a dry and moist towel reduced but did not eliminate MRSA. The germicidal wipe step resulted in no growth in 15 of 15 (100%; 95% CI 80% to 100%) cultures in 3-step disinfection and in 9 of 10 (90%; 95% CI 60% to 98%) when used alone.
Skin and environmental flora are commonly present on ultrasonographic probes between patient encounters in our ED; however, clinically important pathogens are uncommon. S aureus (including MRSA) frequently contaminates uncovered probes during skin and soft tissue infection scanning, but in an experimental model, MRSA appears to be reliably removed by a quaternary ammonia germicidal wipe if the probe is partially cleaned first.
我们评估了急诊部(ED)超声探头污染的频率和涉及的细菌种类,并评估了探头的清洁和消毒方法。
这是一项三部分的观察性横断面研究。在 3 台超声机上,在患者就诊之间对线性和曲线探头进行了监测培养。在对皮肤和软组织感染进行扫描后,立即对未覆盖的探头进行了培养。在对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)进行了实验性探头污染后,我们评估了三步消毒法,即先用干毛巾、盐水湿毛巾、季铵盐杀菌湿巾依次清洁,再用杀菌湿巾单独进行一步消毒;以及一步消毒法,即用杀菌湿巾直接进行消毒。将探头直接放在血琼脂平板上进行培养以获取样本。
在第 1 部分中,在 11 个月的 29 个采样日期间,从 6 个探头的 164 个监测培养物中,111 个(67%;95%置信区间[CI]为 60%至 74%)生长出正常的皮肤菌群或环境菌群,52 个没有生长(32%;95%CI 为 25%至 39%),2 个(1.2%;95%CI 为 0.3%至 4.3%)生长出具有临床重要意义的病原体。在第 2 部分中,在对皮肤和软组织感染进行扫描后,采集的 20 个培养物中有 14 个(70%;95%CI 为 48%至 85%)产生了大量具有临床重要意义的病原体,包括 13 株金黄色葡萄球菌(5 株耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌)。在第 3 部分中,用干毛巾和湿毛巾清洁虽然减少了,但并未消除 MRSA。在三步消毒法中,杀菌湿巾这一步导致 15 个培养物中有 15 个(100%;95%CI 为 80%至 100%)没有生长,而在单独使用杀菌湿巾时,10 个培养物中有 9 个(90%;95%CI 为 60%至 98%)没有生长。
在我们的 ED 中,在患者就诊之间,皮肤和环境菌群通常会出现在超声探头表面;然而,具有临床重要意义的病原体并不常见。金黄色葡萄球菌(包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌)在对皮肤和软组织感染进行扫描时,经常会污染未覆盖的探头,但在实验模型中,如果探头先进行部分清洁,季铵盐杀菌湿巾似乎可以可靠地去除耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌。