Suppr超能文献

急诊超声探头污染与探头消毒的实验模型。

Emergency department ultrasonographic probe contamination and experimental model of probe disinfection.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda County Medical Center-Highland Campus, Oakland, CA 94602, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.12.015. Epub 2011 Jan 21.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We evaluate the frequency of emergency department (ED) ultrasonographic probe contamination and the bacterial species involved and evaluate probe cleaning and disinfection methods.

METHODS

This was a 3-part observational cross-sectional study. Surveillance cultures were taken of linear and curvilinear probes on 3 ultrasonographic machines between patient encounters. Cultures of uncovered probes were taken immediately after scanning of skin and soft tissue infections. After experimental probe contamination with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), we assessed 3-step disinfection by sequential cleaning with a dry towel, saline solution-moistened towel, and quaternary ammonia germicidal wipe and 1-step disinfection by germicidal wipe alone. Cultures were obtained by applying the probe to a blood agar plate.

RESULTS

In part 1, of 164 surveillance cultures obtained from 6 probes on 29 sampling days during 11 months, 111 (67%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 60% to 74%) grew normal skin flora or environmental flora, 52 had no growth (32%; 95% CI 25% to 39%), and 2 (1.2%; 95% CI 0.3% to 4.3%) grew a clinically important pathogen. In part 2, 14 of 20 (70%; 95% CI 48% to 85%) cultures taken after skin and soft tissue infection scanning produced heavy growth of a clinically important pathogen, including 13 S aureus (5 MRSA). In part 3, cleaning with a dry and moist towel reduced but did not eliminate MRSA. The germicidal wipe step resulted in no growth in 15 of 15 (100%; 95% CI 80% to 100%) cultures in 3-step disinfection and in 9 of 10 (90%; 95% CI 60% to 98%) when used alone.

CONCLUSION

Skin and environmental flora are commonly present on ultrasonographic probes between patient encounters in our ED; however, clinically important pathogens are uncommon. S aureus (including MRSA) frequently contaminates uncovered probes during skin and soft tissue infection scanning, but in an experimental model, MRSA appears to be reliably removed by a quaternary ammonia germicidal wipe if the probe is partially cleaned first.

摘要

研究目的

我们评估了急诊部(ED)超声探头污染的频率和涉及的细菌种类,并评估了探头的清洁和消毒方法。

方法

这是一项三部分的观察性横断面研究。在 3 台超声机上,在患者就诊之间对线性和曲线探头进行了监测培养。在对皮肤和软组织感染进行扫描后,立即对未覆盖的探头进行了培养。在对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)进行了实验性探头污染后,我们评估了三步消毒法,即先用干毛巾、盐水湿毛巾、季铵盐杀菌湿巾依次清洁,再用杀菌湿巾单独进行一步消毒;以及一步消毒法,即用杀菌湿巾直接进行消毒。将探头直接放在血琼脂平板上进行培养以获取样本。

结果

在第 1 部分中,在 11 个月的 29 个采样日期间,从 6 个探头的 164 个监测培养物中,111 个(67%;95%置信区间[CI]为 60%至 74%)生长出正常的皮肤菌群或环境菌群,52 个没有生长(32%;95%CI 为 25%至 39%),2 个(1.2%;95%CI 为 0.3%至 4.3%)生长出具有临床重要意义的病原体。在第 2 部分中,在对皮肤和软组织感染进行扫描后,采集的 20 个培养物中有 14 个(70%;95%CI 为 48%至 85%)产生了大量具有临床重要意义的病原体,包括 13 株金黄色葡萄球菌(5 株耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌)。在第 3 部分中,用干毛巾和湿毛巾清洁虽然减少了,但并未消除 MRSA。在三步消毒法中,杀菌湿巾这一步导致 15 个培养物中有 15 个(100%;95%CI 为 80%至 100%)没有生长,而在单独使用杀菌湿巾时,10 个培养物中有 9 个(90%;95%CI 为 60%至 98%)没有生长。

结论

在我们的 ED 中,在患者就诊之间,皮肤和环境菌群通常会出现在超声探头表面;然而,具有临床重要意义的病原体并不常见。金黄色葡萄球菌(包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌)在对皮肤和软组织感染进行扫描时,经常会污染未覆盖的探头,但在实验模型中,如果探头先进行部分清洁,季铵盐杀菌湿巾似乎可以可靠地去除耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验