BCARE, Department of Medical Microbiology, Lime Walk Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, United Kingdom.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Apr;55(4):1436-42. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00936-10. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
Simulations of administration of razupenem at 1 g every 12 h by 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion were performed in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection. The antibacterial effect of this razupenem dosing regimen against six strains of Staphylococcus aureus (one methicillin-sensitive S. aureus [MSSA] strain [MIC, 0.015 μg/ml] and five methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA] strains [MIC range, 0.09 to 3 μg/ml]) and five strains of Enterobacteriaceae (three Escherichia coli strains [two containing extended-spectrum β-lactamases {ESBLs}] and two Enterobacter sp. strains [one with an AmpC enzyme and the other with a raised razupenem MIC; MIC range, 0.09 to 6 μg/ml]) was assessed. Against the MSSA and MRSA strains, razupenem produced a >3.5-log-unit reduction in viable count after 24 h. There were no changes in population profiles. In a second series of experiments, over 5 days there was rapid initial clearance of MRSA from the model followed by regrowth after 48 h. MRSA colonies appeared on 2× MIC recovery medium after 72 h with strain 33820 (MIC, 3.0 μg/ml) and at 120 h with strain 27706 (MIC, 1.5 μg/ml). Against E. coli and Enterobacter spp., razupenem produced a >3.5-log-unit reduction in bacterial counts for all strains except that with an MIC of 6 μg/ml, where razupenem had a notably poorer antibacterial effect. Population profiles were unchanged after 48 h of exposure to razupenem except for Enterobacter strain 34425 (MIC, 6.0 μg/ml), where colonies were recovered from media containing 2×, 4×, and 8× MIC. In dose-ranging studies with MRSA strains, the percentage of the dosing interval that the free drug concentration remained higher than the pathogen MIC (fT>MIC) for a 24-h bacteriostatic effect was 5.0% ± 1.4%, and that for a 1-log-unit reduction in count was 12.5% ± 5.8%. Population profiles indicated growth on 2× MIC recovery medium at fT>MIC values of 1 to 35% but not at a value of >35%. In a similar set of experiments with Enterobacteriaceae, the fT>MIC for a 24-h bacteriostatic effect was 34.2% ± 7.6% and that for a 1-log-unit reduction in count was 42.5% ± 7.8%. Population analysis profiles indicated growth on recovery media with 2×, 4×, and 8× MIC at fT>MICs in the range of 1 to 69% but rarely at values of ≥ 70%. In conclusion, razupenem at simulated human doses of 1 g i.v. every 12 h has a marked antibacterial effect on MSSA and MRSA strains with MICs of ≤ 3.0 μg/ml and Enterobacteriaceae with MICs of ≤ 0.4 μg/ml. fT>MIC targets of ≥ 35% for MRSA and ≥ 70% for Enterobacteriaceae should provide significant antibacterial effects combined with low risks of changing pathogen antibiotic population profiles.
在感染的体外药代动力学模型中,对 razupenem 每 12 小时 1 克静脉(i.v.)输注 1 小时进行了模拟给药。评估了 razupenem 这种给药方案对 6 株金黄色葡萄球菌(1 株甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌[MSSA]菌株[MIC,0.015μg/ml]和 5 株耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌[MRSA]菌株[MIC 范围,0.09 至 3μg/ml])和 5 株肠杆菌科(3 株大肠埃希菌[两种含有扩展谱β-内酰胺酶[ESBLs]的菌株]和 2 株肠杆菌属菌株[一种含有 AmpC 酶,另一种 razupenem MIC 升高;MIC 范围,0.09 至 6μg/ml])的抗菌作用。对 MSSA 和 MRSA 菌株,razupenem 在 24 小时后可使活菌计数减少>3.5 对数单位。种群特征没有变化。在第二系列实验中,MRSA 在模型中迅速初始清除,48 小时后重新生长。MRSA 菌株 33820(MIC,3.0μg/ml)在 72 小时后和菌株 27706(MIC,1.5μg/ml)在 120 小时后在 2×MIC 恢复培养基上出现菌落。对大肠埃希菌和肠杆菌属,razupenem 对所有菌株的细菌计数减少>3.5 对数单位,但 MIC 为 6μg/ml 的菌株除外,razupenem 对其具有明显较差的抗菌作用。暴露于 razupenem 48 小时后,除 MIC 为 6.0μg/ml 的肠杆菌属菌株 34425 外,种群特征没有变化,在该菌株中从含有 2×、4×和 8×MIC 的培养基中回收了菌落。在对 MRSA 菌株进行的剂量范围研究中,游离药物浓度在 24 小时杀菌作用期间高于病原体 MIC(fT>MIC)的时间百分比为 5.0%±1.4%,在计数减少 1 对数单位的时间百分比为 12.5%±5.8%。种群特征表明,在 fT>MIC 值为 1 至 35%时,在 2×MIC 恢复培养基上生长,但在 fT>MIC 值>35%时则不生长。在类似的肠杆菌科实验中,24 小时杀菌作用的 fT>MIC 为 34.2%±7.6%,计数减少 1 对数单位的 fT>MIC 为 42.5%±7.8%。种群分析谱表明,在 fT>MIC 值为 1 至 69%的范围内,在 2×、4×和 8×MIC 的恢复培养基上生长,但 fT>MIC 值≥70%时很少生长。总之,模拟人类剂量 razupenem 每 12 小时静脉注射 1 克,对 MIC≤3.0μg/ml 的 MSSA 和 MRSA 菌株以及 MIC≤0.4μg/ml 的肠杆菌科具有显著的抗菌作用。MRSA 的 fT>MIC 目标值≥35%和肠杆菌科的 fT>MIC 目标值≥70%应提供显著的抗菌作用,同时降低改变病原体抗生素种群特征的风险。