State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou; Department of Gastric and Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou; Department of Gastric and Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Ann Oncol. 2011 Sep;22(9):2049-2056. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq716. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR), established a hypothetical tumor-ratio-metastasis (TRM) staging system and compared it with the 7th edition International Union Against Cancer pathological N (pN) and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system.
A total of 1343 gastric cancer patients undergoing D2 resection were staged using the TRM staging system and the 7th edition TNM system. Optimal cut points of LNR were calculated using X-tile software and validated by bootstrapping. Homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity of gradients of the TRM and TNM systems were compared using linear trend χ(2), likelihood ratio χ(2) statistics, and Akaike information criterion (AIC) calculations.
Optimal cut points classified patients into LNR0 (0%), LNR1 (1%-30%), LNR2 (31%-60%), and LNR3 (61%-100%) groups. In univariate, multivariate and stratified analyses, the LNR staging showed superiority to the 7th edition pN staging. The TRM staging system had higher linear trend and likelihood ratio χ(2) scores and smaller AIC values compared with those for the TNM system, which represented the optimum prognostic stratification.
The novel TRM staging system predicts survival of gastric cancer more accurately than the 7th edition TNM system. It may be considered as an alternative to TNM system.
本研究旨在评估淋巴结比率(LNR)的预后价值,建立假设的肿瘤-比率-转移(TRM)分期系统,并将其与第 7 版国际抗癌联盟病理 N(pN)和肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)系统进行比较。
对 1343 例接受 D2 切除术的胃癌患者进行 TRM 分期系统和第 7 版 TNM 系统分期。使用 X-tile 软件计算 LNR 的最佳截断点,并通过自举法进行验证。使用线性趋势 χ(2)、似然比 χ(2)统计和 Akaike 信息准则(AIC)计算比较 TRM 和 TNM 系统的同质性、区分能力和梯度单调。
最佳截断点将患者分为 LNR0(0%)、LNR1(1%-30%)、LNR2(31%-60%)和 LNR3(61%-100%)组。在单因素、多因素和分层分析中,LNR 分期优于第 7 版 pN 分期。与 TNM 系统相比,TRM 分期系统的线性趋势和似然比 χ(2)评分更高,AIC 值更小,代表了最佳的预后分层。
新的 TRM 分期系统比第 7 版 TNM 系统更能准确预测胃癌的生存情况。它可以被视为 TNM 系统的替代方案。