Centre for Documentation and Evaluation of Alternatives to Animal Experiments (ZEBET), Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Arch Toxicol. 2011 May;85(5):367-485. doi: 10.1007/s00204-011-0693-2. Epub 2011 May 1.
The 7th amendment to the EU Cosmetics Directive prohibits to put animal-tested cosmetics on the market in Europe after 2013. In that context, the European Commission invited stakeholder bodies (industry, non-governmental organisations, EU Member States, and the Commission's Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) to identify scientific experts in five toxicological areas, i.e. toxicokinetics, repeated dose toxicity, carcinogenicity, skin sensitisation, and reproductive toxicity for which the Directive foresees that the 2013 deadline could be further extended in case alternative and validated methods would not be available in time. The selected experts were asked to analyse the status and prospects of alternative methods and to provide a scientifically sound estimate of the time necessary to achieve full replacement of animal testing. In summary, the experts confirmed that it will take at least another 7-9 years for the replacement of the current in vivo animal tests used for the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients for skin sensitisation. However, the experts were also of the opinion that alternative methods may be able to give hazard information, i.e. to differentiate between sensitisers and non-sensitisers, ahead of 2017. This would, however, not provide the complete picture of what is a safe exposure because the relative potency of a sensitiser would not be known. For toxicokinetics, the timeframe was 5-7 years to develop the models still lacking to predict lung absorption and renal/biliary excretion, and even longer to integrate the methods to fully replace the animal toxicokinetic models. For the systemic toxicological endpoints of repeated dose toxicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity, the time horizon for full replacement could not be estimated.
欧盟化妆品指令的第 7 修正案禁止在 2013 年后将经过动物测试的化妆品投放于欧洲市场。在这种情况下,欧盟委员会邀请利益攸关方(行业、非政府组织、欧盟成员国和委员会的消费者安全科学委员会)确定五个毒理学领域的科学专家,即毒代动力学、重复剂量毒性、致癌性、皮肤致敏性和生殖毒性。对于这些领域,指令规定如果在 2013 年之前无法获得替代和验证的方法,那么截止日期可以进一步延长。选定的专家被要求分析替代方法的现状和前景,并对替代动物测试所需的时间提供科学合理的估计。总的来说,专家们确认,至少还需要 7-9 年的时间才能完全取代目前用于皮肤致敏安全性评估的化妆品成分的体内动物测试。然而,专家们也认为,替代方法可能能够在 2017 年之前提供危害信息,即区分致敏剂和非致敏剂。然而,这并不能提供关于安全暴露的完整情况,因为致敏剂的相对效力是未知的。对于毒代动力学,需要 5-7 年的时间来开发仍缺乏预测肺吸收和肾/胆汁排泄的模型,甚至更长的时间来整合这些方法,以完全替代动物毒代动力学模型。对于重复剂量毒性、致癌性和生殖毒性的系统毒理学终点,无法估计完全替代的时间范围。