Division of Endocrinology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Jul;86(7):615-26. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0681.
To determine whether duloxetine is noninferior to (as good as) pregabalin in the treatment of pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
We performed a 12-week, open-label study of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain who had been treated with gabapentin (≥ 900 mg/d) and had an inadequate response (defined as a daily pain score of ≥ 4 on a numerical rating scale [0-10 points]). The first patient was enrolled on September 28, 2006, and the last patient visit occurred on August 26, 2009. Patients were randomized to duloxetine monotherapy (n=138), pregabalin monotherapy (n=134), or a combination of duloxetine and gabapentin (n=135). The primary objective was a noninferiority comparison between duloxetine and pregabalin on improvement in the weekly mean of the diary-based daily pain score (0- to 10-point scale) at end point. Noninferiority would be declared if the mean improvement for duloxetine was no worse than the mean improvement for pregabalin, within statistical variability, by a margin of -0.8 unit.
The mean change in the pain rating at end point was -2.6 for duloxetine and -2.1 for pregabalin. The 97.5% lower confidence limit was a -0.05 difference in means, establishing noninferiority. As to adverse effects, nausea, insomnia, hyperhidrosis, and decreased appetite were more frequent with duloxetine than pregabalin; insomnia, more frequent with duloxetine than duloxetine plus gabapentin; peripheral edema, more frequent with pregabalin than with duloxetine; and nausea, hyperhidrosis, decreased appetite, and vomiting, more frequent with duloxetine plus gabapentin than with pregabalin.
Duloxetine was noninferior to pregabalin for the treatment of pain in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy who had an inadequate pain response to gabapentin.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00385671.
确定度洛西汀治疗糖尿病周围神经病变相关疼痛是否不劣于(与)普瑞巴林。
我们进行了一项为期 12 周的开放性研究,纳入了正在接受加巴喷丁(≥900mg/d)治疗且应答不足(定义为数字评定量表[0-10 分]上的每日疼痛评分≥4)的糖尿病周围神经病理性疼痛患者。首位患者于 2006 年 9 月 28 日入组,最后一次患者就诊时间为 2009 年 8 月 26 日。患者被随机分配至度洛西汀单药治疗组(n=138)、普瑞巴林单药治疗组(n=134)或度洛西汀与加巴喷丁联合治疗组(n=135)。主要目的是比较度洛西汀与普瑞巴林在终点时基于日记的每日疼痛评分(0-10 分量表)的每周平均改善情况,以评估度洛西汀的非劣效性。如果度洛西汀的平均改善程度不比普瑞巴林差,且在统计学上有差异,则可宣布度洛西汀具有非劣效性,差值为-0.8 个单位。
终点时疼痛评分的平均变化为度洛西汀组-2.6,普瑞巴林组-2.1。97.5%置信下限为平均差值的-0.05,这表明度洛西汀具有非劣效性。关于不良反应,度洛西汀组比普瑞巴林组更常见恶心、失眠、多汗和食欲减退;度洛西汀组比度洛西汀联合加巴喷丁组更常见失眠;普瑞巴林组比度洛西汀组更常见外周水肿;度洛西汀联合加巴喷丁组比普瑞巴林组更常见恶心、多汗、食欲减退和呕吐。
对于对加巴喷丁治疗应答不足的糖尿病周围神经病变相关疼痛患者,度洛西汀治疗不劣于普瑞巴林。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00385671。