Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2011 Jul-Aug;126 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):135-46. doi: 10.1177/00333549111260S215.
We evaluated the association between parents' beliefs about vaccines, their decision to delay or refuse vaccines for their children, and vaccination coverage of children at aged 24 months.
We used data from 11,206 parents of children aged 24-35 months at the time of the 2009 National Immunization Survey interview and determined their vaccination status at aged 24 months. Data included parents' reports of delay and/or refusal of vaccine doses, psychosocial factors suggested by the Health Belief Model, and provider-reported up-to-date vaccination status.
In 2009, approximately 60.2% of parents with children aged 24-35 months neither delayed nor refused vaccines, 25.8% only delayed, 8.2% only refused, and 5.8% both delayed and refused vaccines. Compared with parents who neither delayed nor refused vaccines, parents who delayed and refused vaccines were significantly less likely to believe that vaccines are necessary to protect the health of children (70.1% vs. 96.2%), that their child might get a disease if they aren't vaccinated (71.0% vs. 90.0%), and that vaccines are safe (50.4% vs. 84.9%). Children of parents who delayed and refused also had significantly lower vaccination coverage for nine of the 10 recommended childhood vaccines including diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (65.3% vs. 85.2%), polio (76.9% vs. 93.8%), and measles-mumps-rubella (68.4% vs. 92.5%). After adjusting for sociodemographic differences, we found that parents who were less likely to agree that vaccines are necessary to protect the health of children, to believe that their child might get a disease if they aren't vaccinated, or to believe that vaccines are safe had significantly lower coverage for all 10 childhood vaccines.
Parents who delayed and refused vaccine doses were more likely to have vaccine safety concerns and perceive fewer benefits associated with vaccines. Guidelines published by the American Academy of Pediatrics may assist providers in responding to parents who may delay or refuse vaccines.
我们评估了父母对疫苗的信念、他们为孩子延迟或拒绝疫苗接种的决定,以及 24 月龄儿童的疫苗接种覆盖率之间的关联。
我们使用了 2009 年全国免疫调查访谈时年龄在 24-35 个月的 11206 名儿童的父母的数据,并确定了他们在 24 月龄时的疫苗接种状况。数据包括父母报告的疫苗剂量延迟和/或拒绝、健康信念模型中提出的心理社会因素,以及提供者报告的最新疫苗接种状况。
2009 年,约 60.2%的 24-35 月龄儿童的父母既没有延迟也没有拒绝疫苗接种,25.8%的父母仅延迟接种,8.2%的父母仅拒绝接种,5.8%的父母同时延迟和拒绝接种疫苗。与既不延迟也不拒绝疫苗接种的父母相比,同时延迟和拒绝疫苗接种的父母明显不太相信疫苗对保护儿童健康是必要的(70.1%比 96.2%),他们的孩子如果不接种疫苗可能会患上某种疾病(71.0%比 90.0%),以及疫苗是安全的(50.4%比 84.9%)。同时延迟和拒绝疫苗接种的儿童,10 种推荐儿童疫苗中的 9 种疫苗接种率明显较低,包括白喉-破伤风-无细胞百日咳(65.3%比 85.2%)、脊髓灰质炎(76.9%比 93.8%)和麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹(68.4%比 92.5%)。在调整了社会人口学差异后,我们发现,那些不太相信疫苗对保护儿童健康是必要的、不太相信如果孩子不接种疫苗可能会患上某种疾病,或不太相信疫苗是安全的父母,他们所有 10 种儿童疫苗的接种率都明显较低。
延迟和拒绝疫苗接种的父母更有可能对疫苗安全问题表示担忧,并认为疫苗接种的益处较少。美国儿科学会发布的指南可能有助于提供者应对可能延迟或拒绝疫苗接种的父母。