Suppr超能文献

活化的人重组凝血因子 VII 治疗成人感染性休克。

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock.

机构信息

Ospedale S. Giovanni Battista-Molinette, Università di Torino, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2055-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1202290. Epub 2012 May 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There have been conflicting reports on the efficacy of recombinant human activated protein C, or drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA), for the treatment of patients with septic shock.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, we assigned 1697 patients with infection, systemic inflammation, and shock who were receiving fluids and vasopressors above a threshold dose for 4 hours to receive either DrotAA (at a dose of 24 μg per kilogram of body weight per hour) or placebo for 96 hours. The primary outcome was death from any cause 28 days after randomization.

RESULTS

At 28 days, 223 of 846 patients (26.4%) in the DrotAA group and 202 of 834 (24.2%) in the placebo group had died (relative risk in the DrotAA group, 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.28; P=0.31). At 90 days, 287 of 842 patients (34.1%) in the DrotAA group and 269 of 822 (32.7%) in the placebo group had died (relative risk, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.19; P=0.56). Among patients with severe protein C deficiency at baseline, 98 of 342 (28.7%) in the DrotAA group had died at 28 days, as compared with 102 of 331 (30.8%) in the placebo group (risk ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.17; P=0.54). Similarly, rates of death at 28 and 90 days were not significantly different in other predefined subgroups, including patients at increased risk for death. Serious bleeding during the treatment period occurred in 10 patients in the DrotAA group and 8 in the placebo group (P=0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

DrotAA did not significantly reduce mortality at 28 or 90 days, as compared with placebo, in patients with septic shock. (Funded by Eli Lilly; PROWESS-SHOCK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00604214.).

摘要

背景

关于重组人活化蛋白 C(或 drotrecogin alfa(激活)(DrotAA))治疗感染性休克患者的疗效,已有相互矛盾的报告。

方法

在这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心试验中,我们将 1697 名患有感染、全身炎症和休克的患者随机分为两组,这些患者在接受液体和升压药物治疗 4 小时后,药物剂量超过阈值,一组接受 DrotAA(每公斤体重 24μg/小时)治疗,另一组接受安慰剂治疗 96 小时。主要终点是随机分组后 28 天的任何原因死亡。

结果

28 天时,DrotAA 组 846 例患者中有 223 例(26.4%)和安慰剂组 834 例患者中有 202 例(24.2%)死亡(DrotAA 组的相对风险,1.09;95%置信区间 [CI],0.92 至 1.28;P=0.31)。90 天时,DrotAA 组 842 例患者中有 287 例(34.1%)和安慰剂组 822 例患者中有 269 例(26.9%)死亡(相对风险,1.04;95%CI,0.90 至 1.19;P=0.56)。在基线时严重蛋白 C 缺乏的患者中,DrotAA 组 342 例患者中有 98 例(28.7%)在 28 天时死亡,安慰剂组 331 例患者中有 102 例(30.8%)死亡(风险比,0.93;95%CI,0.74 至 1.17;P=0.54)。同样,在其他预先设定的亚组中,包括死亡风险增加的患者,28 天和 90 天的死亡率也没有显著差异。在治疗期间,DrotAA 组有 10 例患者发生严重出血,安慰剂组有 8 例(P=0.81)。

结论

与安慰剂相比,DrotAA 并未显著降低感染性休克患者 28 天或 90 天的死亡率。(由礼来公司资助;PROWESS-SHOCK 临床试验.gov 编号,NCT00604214。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验