Iroko Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Navy Yard Corporate Center, Philadelphia, USA.
Pain Med. 2012 Nov;13(11):1491-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01479.x. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
Safety concerns associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have prompted the development of new formulations that minimize adverse events (AEs) and maintain efficacy.
To determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of an investigational, proprietary, nano-formulated, oral diclofenac (nano-formulated diclofenac) compared with placebo in subjects with acute dental pain.
A Phase 2, multisite, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled study was carried out in 202 subjects (18-50 years old) who had extraction of ≥2 third molars (≥1 had to be a fully or partially impacted mandibular third molar) and experienced moderate to severe pain intensity ≤6 hours postsurgery (NCT00985439). Subjects received nano-formulated diclofenac 35 mg or 18 mg, celecoxib 400 mg, or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was the sum of total pain relief (TOTPAR) over 0-12 hours (TOTPAR-12) after Time 0. Secondary end points included TOTPAR over 0-4 hours (TOTPAR-4), TOTPAR over 0-8 hours (TOTPAR-8), and time to onset of analgesia.
Mean ± standard deviation TOTPAR-12 for nano-formulated diclofenac 35 mg and 18 mg, celecoxib, and placebo were 16.81 ± 12.76, 17.76 ± 13.76, 14.61 ± 15.05, and 5.65 ± 11.53, respectively (P < 0.001, nano-formulated diclofenac compared with placebo). Similar improvements were observed for TOTPAR-4, TOTPAR-8, mean time to first perceptible pain relief (P < 0.001), and peak relief (P < 0.05). Celecoxib treatment was not statistically different than placebo for these latter two parameters. Treatment-emergent AEs were similar across all treatment groups.
Lower dose, nano-formulated diclofenac demonstrated good overall efficacy, prompt pain relief, and was well tolerated. These data suggest lower dose nano-formulated NSAIDs could be effective for acute pain and may potentially improve safety and tolerability as a result of using a lower overall dose.
非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的安全性问题促使开发了新的制剂,以最大限度地减少不良反应(AE)并保持疗效。
确定研究性专有纳米配方双氯芬酸(纳米配方双氯芬酸)与安慰剂相比在急性牙痛患者中的镇痛疗效和安全性。
一项 202 例(18-50 岁)受试者参与的 2 期、多中心、随机、双盲、单次剂量、平行组、活性和安慰剂对照研究在进行中,这些受试者接受了至少 2 颗第三磨牙(至少 1 颗为完全或部分埋伏下颌第三磨牙)的拔除,并经历了术后≤6 小时的中度至重度疼痛强度(NCT00985439)。受试者接受纳米配方双氯芬酸 35mg 或 18mg、塞来昔布 400mg 或安慰剂。主要疗效变量为 0-12 小时(TOTPAR-12)时的总疼痛缓解(TOTPAR)总和。次要终点包括 0-4 小时(TOTPAR-4)、0-8 小时(TOTPAR-8)的 TOTPAR 和镇痛起效时间。
纳米配方双氯芬酸 35mg 和 18mg、塞来昔布和安慰剂的平均 TOTPAR-12 分别为 16.81±12.76、17.76±13.76、14.61±15.05 和 5.65±11.53(P<0.001,纳米配方双氯芬酸与安慰剂相比)。TOTPAR-4、TOTPAR-8、首次可感知疼痛缓解的平均时间(P<0.001)和峰值缓解(P<0.05)也观察到类似的改善。与安慰剂相比,塞来昔布治疗在这两个参数上无统计学差异。所有治疗组的治疗后不良事件相似。
较低剂量的纳米配方双氯芬酸表现出良好的总体疗效、迅速的疼痛缓解且耐受性良好。这些数据表明,低剂量纳米配方 NSAIDs 可能对急性疼痛有效,并可能由于使用较低的总剂量而潜在地提高安全性和耐受性。