Baharivand Nader, Mahdavifard Ali, Fouladi Rohollah Fadaei
Nikookari Eye Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Int Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;33(1):39-46. doi: 10.1007/s10792-012-9634-1. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
Both oral and intraocular routes have been recommended for medication administration in toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis; however, available data, in support or against, are scarce. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of intravitreal clindamycin plus dexamethasone (IVCD) and conventional oral therapy (COT) including pyrimethamine, sulfadiazine, folinic acid and prednisone in active toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. In this prospective randomized single-blind clinical trial, patients with active toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis received either IVCD (n = 32), or COT (n = 34) for 6 weeks. Changes of best-corrected visual acuity, retinal lesion size, and vitreous inflammation before and after treatment, as well as complications/side-effects and recurrence rate within at least 2 years of follow-up were compared between groups. Although all the variables improved significantly at 6 weeks within each group, changes were comparable between the IVCD and COT receivers. There was only one case with hepatotoxicity in the COT group which responded favorably to drug change. No injection-related complication was observed. Recurrence rates were 12.5 and 14.7 % in the IVCD and COT groups, respectively (p = 0.54). In conclusion, both IVCD and COT are equally effective against active toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis but the former is apparently safer and more convenient.
对于弓形虫性视网膜脉络膜炎,口服和眼内途径均被推荐用于药物给药;然而,支持或反对的现有数据很少。本研究的目的是比较玻璃体内注射克林霉素加地塞米松(IVCD)与包括乙胺嘧啶、磺胺嘧啶、亚叶酸和泼尼松的传统口服疗法(COT)在活动性弓形虫性视网膜脉络膜炎中的疗效。在这项前瞻性随机单盲临床试验中,活动性弓形虫性视网膜脉络膜炎患者接受IVCD(n = 32)或COT(n = 34)治疗6周。比较两组治疗前后最佳矫正视力、视网膜病变大小和玻璃体炎症的变化,以及至少2年随访期间的并发症/副作用和复发率。尽管每组在6周时所有变量均有显著改善,但IVCD组和COT组之间的变化相当。COT组仅有1例肝毒性病例,经换药后反应良好。未观察到与注射相关的并发症。IVCD组和COT组的复发率分别为12.5%和14.7%(p = 0.54)。总之,IVCD和COT对活动性弓形虫性视网膜脉络膜炎同样有效,但前者显然更安全、更方便。