Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GA 30333, USA.
Vaccine. 2013 Aug 28;31 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):D20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.056. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) emerged as the leading cause of newborn infection in the United States in the 1970s. In the 1980s clinical trials demonstrated that giving intrapartum intravenous ampicillin or penicillin to mothers at risk was highly effective at preventing invasive GBS disease in the first week of life (early-onset). In 1996, the first national guidelines for the prevention of perinatal GBS disease were issued; these recommended either antenatal screening for GBS colonization and intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis (IAP) to colonized women, or targeting IAP to women with certain obstetric risk factors during labor. In 2002, revised guidelines recommended universal antenatal GBS screening. A multistate population-based review of labor and delivery records in 2003-2004 found 85% of women had documented antenatal GBS screening; 98% of screened women had a colonization result available at labor. However, missed opportunities for prevention were identified among women delivering preterm and among those with penicillin allergy, and more false negative GBS screening results were observed than expected. The incidence of invasive early-onset GBS disease decreased by more than 80% from 1.8 cases/1000 live births in the early 1990s to 0.26 cases/1000 live births in 2010; from 1994 to 2010 we estimate that over 70,000 cases of EOGBS invasive disease were prevented in the United States. IAP effectiveness is similar and high among term (91%) and preterm (86%) infants when first line therapy is received for at least 4h. However, early-onset disease incidence among preterm infants remains twice that of term infants; moreover disease among infants after the first week of life (late-onset disease) has not been impacted by IAP. The US experience demonstrates that universal screening and IAP for GBS-colonized women comprise a highly effective strategy against early-onset GBS infections. Maximizing adherence to recommended practices holds promise to further reduce the burden of early-onset GBS disease. Yet there are also inherent limitations to universal screening and IAP. Some of these could potentially be addressed by an efficacious maternal GBS vaccine.
B 组链球菌(GBS)在 20 世纪 70 年代成为美国新生儿感染的主要原因。20 世纪 80 年代的临床试验表明,给有风险的产妇在分娩时静脉注射氨苄西林或青霉素,可高度有效地预防生命第一周(早发性)的侵袭性 GBS 疾病。1996 年,发布了第一份预防围产期 GBS 疾病的国家指南;这些指南建议对 GBS 定植的孕妇进行产前筛查,并对定植的孕妇进行分娩时的抗菌药物预防(IAP),或在分娩期间针对具有某些产科危险因素的孕妇进行 IAP。2002 年,修订后的指南建议进行普遍的产前 GBS 筛查。2003-2004 年对 20 个州的分娩和分娩记录进行的一项基于人群的审查发现,85%的孕妇有记录的产前 GBS 筛查;98%接受筛查的孕妇在分娩时可获得定植结果。然而,在早产孕妇和青霉素过敏孕妇中发现了预防机会的错失,并且观察到的假阴性 GBS 筛查结果比预期的多。从 20 世纪 90 年代初每 1000 例活产中有 1.8 例侵袭性早发性 GBS 疾病降至 2010 年每 1000 例活产中有 0.26 例;从 1994 年到 2010 年,我们估计在美国预防了超过 70000 例 EOGBS 侵袭性疾病。当一线治疗至少接受 4 小时时,IAP 在足月(91%)和早产(86%)婴儿中的有效性相似且较高。然而,早产儿的早发性疾病发病率仍然是足月儿的两倍;此外,第一周后生命(晚发性疾病)的婴儿的疾病并未受到 IAP 的影响。美国的经验表明,针对 GBS 定植的妇女进行普遍筛查和 IAP 是一种针对早发性 GBS 感染的高度有效的策略。最大限度地遵守推荐的做法有望进一步降低早发性 GBS 疾病的负担。然而,普遍筛查和 IAP 也存在固有局限性。通过一种有效的母体 GBS 疫苗,可能会解决其中的一些问题。