Romieu Isabelle, Gouveia Nelson, Cifuentes Luis A, de Leon Antonio Ponce, Junger Washington, Vera Jeanette, Strappa Valentina, Hurtado-Díaz Magali, Miranda-Soberanis Victor, Rojas-Bracho Leonora, Carbajal-Arroyo Luz, Tzintzun-Cervantes Guadalupe
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 Oct(171):5-86.
The ESCALA* project (Estudio de Salud y Contaminación del Aire en Latinoamérica) is an HEI-funded study that aims to examine the association between exposure to outdoor air pollution and mortality in nine Latin American cities, using a common analytic framework to obtain comparable and updated information on the effects of air pollution on several causes of death in different age groups. This report summarizes the work conducted between 2006 and 2009, describes the methodologic issues addressed during project development, and presents city-specific results of meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses.
The ESCALA project involved three teams of investigators responsible for collection and analysis of city-specific air pollution and mortality data from three different countries. The teams designed five different protocols to standardize the methods of data collection and analysis that would be used to evaluate the effects of air pollution on mortality (see Appendices B-F). By following the same protocols, the investigators could directly compare the results among cities. The analysis was conducted in two stages. The first stage included analyses of all-natural-cause and cause-specific mortality related to particulate matter < or = 10 pm in aerodynamic diameter (PM10) and to ozone (O3) in cities of Brazil, Chile, and México. Analyses for PM10 and O3 were also stratified by age group and O3 analyses were stratified by season. Generalized linear models (GLM) in Poisson regression were used to fit the time-series data. Time trends and seasonality were modeled using natural splines with 3, 6, 9, or 12 degrees of freedom (df) per year. Temperature and humidity were also modeled using natural splines, initially with 3 or 6 df, and then with degrees of freedom chosen on the basis of residual diagnostics (i.e., partial autocorrelation function [PACF], periodograms, and a Q-Q plot) (Appendix H, available on the HEI Web site). Indicator variables for day-of-week and holidays were used to account for short-term cyclic fluctuations. To assess the association between exposure to air pollution and risk of death, the PM10 and O3 data were fit using distributed lag models (DLMs). These models are based on findings indicating that the health effects associated with air pollutant concentrations on a given day may accumulate over several subsequent days. Each DLM measured the cumulative effect of a pollutant concentration on a given day (day 0) and that day's contribution to the effect of that pollutant on multiple subsequent (lagged) days. For this study, exposure lags of up to 3, 5, and 10 days were explored. However, only the results of the DLMs using a 3-day lag (DLM 0-3) are presented in this report because we found a decreasing association with mortality in various age-cause groups for increasing lag effects from 3 to 5 days for both PM10 and O3. The potential modifying effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on the association of PM10 or O3 concentration and mortality was also explored in four cities: Mexico City, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, and Santiago. The methodology for developing a common SES index is presented in the report. The second stage included meta-analyses and metaregression. During this stage, the associations between mortality and air pollution were compared among cities to evaluate the presence of heterogeneity and to explore city-level variables that might explain this heterogeneity. Meta-analyses were conducted to combine mortality effect estimates across cities and to evaluate the presence of heterogeneity among city results, whereas meta-regression models were used to explore variables that might explain the heterogeneity among cities in mortality risks associated with exposures to PM10 (but not to O3).
The results of the mortality analyses are presented as risk percent changes (RPC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RPC is the increase in mortality risk associated with an increase of 10 microg/m3 in the 24-hour average concentration of PM10 or in the daily maximum 8-hour moving average concentration of O3. Most of the results for PM10 were positive and statistically significant, showing an increased risk of mortality with increased ambient concentrations. Results for O3 also showed a statistically significant increase in mortality in the cities with available data. With the distributed lag model, DLM 0-3, PM10 ambient concentrations were associated with an increased risk of mortality in all cities except Concepci6n and Temuco. In Mexico City and Santiago the RPC and 95% CIs were 1.02% (0.87 to 1.17) and 0.48% (0.35 to 0.61), respectively. PM10 was also significantly associated with increased mortality from cardiopulmonary, respiratory, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular-stroke, and chronic obstructive lung diseases (COPD) in most cities. The few nonsignificant effects generally were observed in the smallest cities (Concepción, Temuco, and Toluca). The percentage increases in mortality associated with ambient O3 concentrations were smaller than for those associated with PM10. All-natural-cause mortality was significantly related to O3 in Mexico City, Monterrey, São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. Increased mortality risks for some specific causes were also observed in these cities and in Santiago. In the analyses stratified by season, different patterns in mortality and O3 were observed for cold and warm seasons. Risk estimates for the warm season were larger and significant for several causes of death in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. Risk estimates for the cold season were larger and significant for some causes of death in Mexico City, Monterrey, and Toluca. In an analysis stratified by SES, the all-natural-cause mortality risk in Mexico City was larger for people with a medium SES; however we observed that the risk of mortality related to respiratory causes was larger among people with a low SES, while the risk of mortality related to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular-stroke causes was larger among people with medium or high SES. In São Paulo, the all-natural-cause mortality risk was larger in people with a high SES, while in Rio de Janeiro the all-natural-cause mortality risk was larger in people with a low SES. In both Brazilian cities, the risks of mortality were larger for respiratory causes, especially for the low- and high-SES groups. In Santiago, all-natural-cause mortality risk did not vary with level of SES; however, people with a low SES had a higher respiratory mortality risk, particularly for COPD. People with a medium SES had larger risks of mortality from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular-stroke disease. The effect of ambient PM10 concentrations on infant and child mortality from respiratory causes and lower respiratory infection (LRI) was studied only for Mexico City, Santiago, and São Paulo. Significant increased mortality risk from these causes was observed in both Santiago (in infants and older children) and Mexico City (only in infants). For O3, an increased mortality risk was observed in Mexico City (in infants and older children) and in São Paulo (only in infants during the warm season). The results of the meta-analyses confirmed the positive and statistically significant association between PM10 and all-natural-cause mortality (RPC = 0.77% [95% CI: 0.60 to 1.00]) using the random-effects model. For mortality from specific causes, the percentage increase in mortality ranged from 0.72% (0.54 to 0.89) for cardiovascular disease to 2.44% (1.36 to 3.59) for COPD, also using the random-effects model. For O3, significant positive associations were observed using the random-effects model for some causes, but not for all natural causes or for respiratory diseases in people 65 years or older (> or = 65 years), and not for COPD and cerebrovascular-stroke in the all-age and the > or = 65 age groups. The percentage increase in all-natural-cause mortality was 0.16% (-0.02 to 0.33). In the meta-regression analyses, variables that best explained heterogeneity in mortality risks among cities were the mean average of temperature in the warm season, population percentage of infants (< 1 year), population percentage of children at least 1 year old but < 5 years (i.e., 1-4 years), population percentage of people > or = 65 years, geographic density of PM10 monitors, annual average concentrations of PM10, and mortality rates for lung cancer.
The ESCALA project was undertaken to obtain information for assessing the effects of air pollutants on mortality in Latin America, where large populations are exposed to relatively high levels of ambient air pollution. An important goal was to provide evidence that could inform policies for controlling air pollution in Latin America. This project included the development of standardized protocols for data collection and for statistical analyses as well as statistical analytic programs (routines developed in R by the ESCALA team) to insure comparability of results. The analytic approach and statistical programming developed within this project should be of value for researchers carrying out single-city analyses and should facilitate the inclusion of additional Latin American cities within the ESCALA multicity project. Our analyses confirm what has been observed in other parts of the world regarding the effects of ambient PM10 and 03 concentrations on daily mortality. They also suggest that SES plays a role in the susceptibility of a population to air pollution; people with a lower SES appeared to have an increased risk of death from respiratory causes, particularly COPD. Compared with the general population, infants and young children appeared to be more susceptible to both PM10 and O3, although an increased risk of mortality was not observed in these age groups in all cities. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
ESCALA*项目(拉丁美洲健康与空气污染研究)是一项由健康影响研究所(HEI)资助的研究,旨在通过一个通用分析框架,研究拉丁美洲九个城市室外空气污染暴露与死亡率之间的关联,以获取关于空气污染对不同年龄组多种死因影响的可比且最新的信息。本报告总结了2006年至2009年开展的工作,描述了项目开展过程中遇到的方法学问题,并呈现了各城市的荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析结果。
ESCALA项目由三个调查团队组成,负责收集和分析来自三个不同国家特定城市的空气污染和死亡率数据。这些团队设计了五种不同的方案,以规范用于评估空气污染对死亡率影响的数据收集和分析方法(见附录B - F)。通过遵循相同的方案,研究人员可以直接比较各城市的结果。分析分两个阶段进行。第一阶段包括对巴西、智利和墨西哥城市中与空气动力学直径小于或等于10微米的颗粒物(PM10)及臭氧(O3)相关的所有自然原因死亡率和特定原因死亡率进行分析。PM10和O3的分析也按年龄组分层,O3分析按季节分层。采用泊松回归中的广义线性模型(GLM)来拟合时间序列数据。使用每年具有3、6、9或12个自由度(df)的自然样条对时间趋势和季节性进行建模。温度和湿度也使用自然样条建模,最初为3或6个自由度,然后根据残差诊断(即偏自相关函数[PACF]、周期图和Q - Q图)选择自由度(HEI网站上的附录H)。使用星期几和节假日的指示变量来解释短期周期性波动。为评估空气污染暴露与死亡风险之间的关联,使用分布滞后模型(DLM)对PM10和O3数据进行拟合。这些模型基于以下发现:与给定日期空气污染物浓度相关的健康影响可能会在随后几天累积。每个DLM测量给定日期(第0天)污染物浓度的累积效应以及该天对该污染物在多个后续(滞后)天的效应的贡献。本研究探讨了长达3、5和10天的暴露滞后。然而,本报告仅呈现使用3天滞后(DLM 0 - 3)的DLM结果,因为我们发现对于PM10和O3,随着滞后效应从3天增加到5天,各年龄 - 病因组与死亡率的关联减弱。还在四个城市(墨西哥城、里约热内卢、圣保罗和圣地亚哥)探讨了社会经济地位(SES)对PM10或O3浓度与死亡率关联的潜在修饰作用。报告中介绍了构建通用SES指数的方法。第二阶段包括荟萃分析和荟萃回归。在此阶段中,比较各城市死亡率与空气污染之间的关联,以评估异质性的存在,并探索可能解释这种异质性的城市层面变量。进行荟萃分析以合并各城市的死亡率效应估计值,并评估城市结果之间异质性的存在,而荟萃回归模型用于探索可能解释各城市中与PM10暴露(但不包括O3)相关的死亡率风险异质性的变量。
死亡率分析结果以风险百分比变化(RPC)及95%置信区间(CI)呈现。RPC是指PM10的24小时平均浓度每增加10微克/立方米或O3的每日最大8小时移动平均浓度增加时,死亡率风险的增加。PM10的大多数结果为阳性且具有统计学意义,表明随着环境浓度增加,死亡率风险增加。O3的结果也显示,在有数据的城市中死亡率有统计学意义的增加。使用分布滞后模型DLM 0 - 3,除康塞普西翁和特木科外,所有城市的PM10环境浓度均与死亡率风险增加相关。在墨西哥城和圣地亚哥,RPC及95% CI分别为1.02%(0.87至1.17)和0.48%(0.35至0.61)。在大多数城市,PM10还与心肺疾病、呼吸系统疾病、心血管疾病、脑血管 - 中风和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)导致的死亡率增加显著相关。在最小的城市(康塞普西翁、特木科和托卢卡)通常观察到少数无显著影响的情况。与环境O3浓度相关的死亡率增加百分比低于与PM10相关的增加百分比。在墨西哥城、蒙特雷、圣保罗和里约热内卢,所有自然原因死亡率均与O3显著相关。在这些城市和圣地亚哥,还观察到某些特定原因导致的死亡率风险增加。在按季节分层的分析中,观察到寒冷和温暖季节死亡率与O3的不同模式。在圣保罗和里约热内卢,温暖季节的风险估计值对于几种死因更大且具有统计学意义。在墨西哥城、蒙特雷和托卢卡,寒冷季节的风险估计值对于某些死因更大且具有统计学意义。在按SES分层的分析中,墨西哥城中等SES人群的所有自然原因死亡率风险更大;然而,我们观察到低SES人群中与呼吸系统原因相关的死亡率风险更大,而中等或高SES人群中与心血管和脑血管 - 中风原因相关的死亡率风险更大。在圣保罗,高SES人群的所有自然原因死亡率风险更大,而在里约热内卢,低SES人群的所有自然原因死亡率风险更大。在这两个巴西城市,呼吸系统原因导致的死亡率风险对于低SES和高SES人群都更大。在圣地亚哥,所有自然原因死亡率风险不随SES水平变化;然而,低SES人群的呼吸系统死亡率风险更高,尤其是COPD。中等SES人群患心血管和脑血管 - 中风疾病的死亡率风险更大。仅在墨西哥城、圣地亚哥和圣保罗研究了环境PM10浓度对婴儿和儿童因呼吸系统原因及下呼吸道感染(LRI)导致的死亡率的影响。在圣地亚哥(婴儿和大龄儿童)和墨西哥城(仅婴儿)均观察到这些原因导致的死亡率风险显著增加。对于O3,在墨西哥城(婴儿和大龄儿童)和圣保罗(仅温暖季节的婴儿)观察到死亡率风险增加。荟萃分析结果证实,使用随机效应模型时,PM10与所有自然原因死亡率之间存在正向且具有统计学意义的关联(RPC = 0.77% [95% CI:0.60至1.00])。对于特定原因导致的死亡率,使用随机效应模型时,死亡率增加百分比范围从心血管疾病的0.72%(0.54至0.89)到COPD的2.44%(1.36至3.59)。对于O3,使用随机效应模型时,观察到某些原因存在显著正相关,但并非所有自然原因或65岁及以上(≥65岁)人群的呼吸系统疾病,以及所有年龄组和≥65岁年龄组的COPD和脑血管 - 中风。所有自然原因死亡率增加百分比为0.16%( - 0.02至0.33)。在荟萃回归分析中,最能解释各城市死亡率风险异质性的变量是温暖季节的平均温度、婴儿(<1岁)人口百分比、至少1岁但<5岁(即1 - 4岁)儿童人口百分比、≥65岁人群人口百分比、PM10监测器的地理密度、PM10年平均浓度以及肺癌死亡率。
开展ESCALA项目是为了获取信息,以评估空气污染物对拉丁美洲死亡率的影响,该地区大量人口暴露于相对高水平的环境空气污染中。一个重要目标是提供证据,为拉丁美洲的空气污染控制政策提供参考。该项目包括制定数据收集和统计分析的标准化方案以及统计分析程序(ESCALA团队用R开发的例程),以确保结果的可比性。本项目中开发的分析方法和统计编程对于进行单城市分析的研究人员应具有价值,并应有助于将更多拉丁美洲城市纳入ESCALA多城市项目。我们的分析证实了世界其他地区关于环境PM10和O3浓度对每日死亡率影响的观察结果。它们还表明,SES在人群对空气污染的易感性中起作用;低SES人群似乎因呼吸系统原因,尤其是COPD,死亡风险增加。与一般人群相比,婴儿和幼儿似乎对PM10和O3更易感,尽管并非在所有城市的这些年龄组中都观察到死亡率风险增加。(摘要截断)