Division of Cardiology, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.095.
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices have become the standard of care for patients with heart failure requiring mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplant. However, data on long-term post-transplant survival for these patients are limited. We evaluated the effect of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices on postcardiac transplant survival in the current era.
All patients who received a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant at a single center from June 2005 to September 2011 were evaluated.
Of the 167 patients who received a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant, 77 (46%) underwent cardiac transplantation, 27 died before transplantation (16%), and 63 (38%) remain listed for transplantation and continued with left ventricular assist device support. The mean age of the transplanted patients was 54.5 ± 11.9 years, 57% had an ischemic etiology, and 20% were women. The overall mean duration of left ventricular assist device support before transplantation was 310 ± 227 days (range, 67-1230 days). The mean duration of left ventricular assist device support did not change in patients who had received a left ventricular assist device in the early period of the study (2005-2008, n = 62) compared with those who had received a left ventricular assist device later (2009-2011, n = 78, 373 vs 392 days, P = NS). In addition, no difference was seen in survival between those patients supported with a left ventricular assist device for fewer than 180 days or longer than 180 days before transplantation (P = NS). The actuarial survival after transplantation at 30 days and 1, 3, and 5 years by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 98.7%, 93.0%, 91.1%, and 88.0%, respectively.
The short- and long-term post-transplant survival for patients bridged with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device in the current era has been excellent. Furthermore, the duration of left ventricular assist device support did not affect post-transplant survival. The hemodynamic benefits of ventricular unloading with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices, in addition to their durability and reduced patient morbidity, have contributed to improved post-transplant survival.
作为心脏移植的桥接治疗,连续血流左心室辅助装置已成为心力衰竭患者机械循环支持的标准治疗方法。然而,关于这些患者移植后长期生存的数据有限。我们评估了连续血流左心室辅助装置在当前时代对心脏移植后生存的影响。
评估了 2005 年 6 月至 2011 年 9 月期间在一家中心接受连续血流左心室辅助装置桥接移植的所有患者。
在接受连续血流左心室辅助装置桥接移植的 167 例患者中,77 例(46%)接受了心脏移植,27 例在移植前死亡(16%),63 例(38%)继续接受心脏移植,并继续接受左心室辅助装置支持。接受移植的患者平均年龄为 54.5±11.9 岁,57%有缺血性病因,20%为女性。移植前左心室辅助装置支持的平均总时间为 310±227 天(范围:67-1230 天)。与研究早期(2005-2008 年,n=62)接受左心室辅助装置的患者相比,晚期(2009-2011 年,n=78)接受左心室辅助装置的患者的左心室辅助装置支持时间无明显变化(373 天与 392 天,P=NS)。此外,移植前左心室辅助装置支持时间少于 180 天或超过 180 天的患者之间,移植后生存无差异(P=NS)。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,移植后 30 天、1、3 和 5 年的累积生存率分别为 98.7%、93.0%、91.1%和 88.0%。
当前时代,接受连续血流左心室辅助装置桥接治疗的患者在移植后的短期和长期生存情况都非常出色。此外,左心室辅助装置支持时间不影响移植后生存。连续血流左心室辅助装置可减轻心室负荷,具有耐用性和降低患者发病率等优点,这些优点都有助于改善移植后的生存。