Al Rawahi Thuria, Lopes Alberto D, Bristow Robert E, Bryant Andrew, Elattar Ahmed, Chattopadhyay Supratik, Galaal Khadra
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal Hospital, Seeb, Oman.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD008765. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008765.pub3.
The standard management of primary ovarian cancer is optimal cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. Most women with primary ovarian cancer achieve remission on this combination therapy. For women achieving clinical remission after completion of initial treatment, most (60%) with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer will ultimately develop recurrent disease. However, the standard treatment of women with recurrent ovarian cancer remains poorly defined. Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer has been suggested to be associated with increased overall survival.
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of optimal secondary cytoreductive surgery for women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. To assess the impact of various residual tumour sizes, over a range between 0 cm and 2 cm, on overall survival.
We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to December 2012. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field. For databases other than MEDLINE, the search strategy has been adapted accordingly.
Retrospective data on residual disease, or data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective/retrospective observational studies that included a multivariate analysis of 50 or more adult women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy. We only included studies that defined optimal cytoreduction as surgery leading to residual tumours with a maximum diameter of any threshold up to 2 cm.
Two review authors (KG, TA) independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible the data were synthesised in a meta-analysis.
There were no RCTs; however, we found nine non-randomised studies that reported on 1194 women with comparison of residual disease after secondary cytoreduction using a multivariate analysis that met our inclusion criteria. These retrospective and prospective studies assessed survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery in women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.Meta- and single-study analyses show the prognostic importance of complete cytoreduction to microscopic disease, since overall survival was significantly prolonged in these groups of women (most studies showed a large statistically significant greater risk of death in all residual disease groups compared to microscopic disease).Recurrence-free survival was not reported in any of the studies. All of the studies included at least 50 women and used statistical adjustment for important prognostic factors. One study compared sub-optimal (> 1 cm) versus optimal (< 1 cm) cytoreduction and demonstrated benefit to achieving cytoreduction to less than 1 cm, if microscopic disease could not be achieved (hazard ratio (HR) 3.51, 95% CI 1.84 to 6.70). Similarly, one study found that women whose tumour had been cytoreduced to less than 0.5 cm had less risk of death compared to those with residual disease greater than 0.5 cm after surgery (HR not reported; P value < 0.001).There is high risk of bias due to the non-randomised nature of these studies, where, despite statistical adjustment for important prognostic factors, selection is based on retrospective achievability of cytoreduction, not an intention to treat, and so a degree of bias is inevitable.Adverse events, quality of life and cost-effectiveness were not reported in any of the studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, ability to achieve surgery with complete cytoreduction (no visible residual disease) is associated with significant improvement in overall survival. However, in the absence of RCT evidence, it is not clear whether this is solely due to surgical effect or due to tumour biology. Indirect evidence would support surgery to achieve complete cytoreduction in selected women. The risks of major surgery need to be carefully balanced against potential benefits on a case-by-case basis.
原发性卵巢癌的标准治疗是进行最佳肿瘤细胞减灭术,随后进行铂类化疗。大多数原发性卵巢癌女性通过这种联合治疗实现缓解。对于在初始治疗完成后实现临床缓解的女性,大多数(60%)晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者最终会复发。然而,复发性卵巢癌女性的标准治疗仍不明确。有人提出复发性卵巢癌手术与总生存期延长有关。
评估最佳二次肿瘤细胞减灭术对复发性上皮性卵巢癌女性的有效性和安全性。评估在0厘米至2厘米范围内各种残留肿瘤大小对总生存期的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane妇科癌症组试验注册库、MEDLINE、EMBASE以及截至2012年12月的Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)。我们还检索了临床试验注册库、科学会议摘要、纳入研究的参考文献列表,并联系了该领域的专家。对于MEDLINE以外的数据库,检索策略已相应调整。
关于残留疾病的回顾性数据,或来自随机对照试验(RCT)或前瞻性/回顾性观察性研究的数据,这些研究对50名或更多接受二次肿瘤细胞减灭术并辅助化疗的复发性上皮性卵巢癌成年女性进行了多变量分析。我们仅纳入将最佳肿瘤细胞减灭定义为手术导致残留肿瘤最大直径达到任何阈值直至2厘米的研究。
两位综述作者(KG,TA)独立提取数据并评估偏倚风险。在可能的情况下,数据进行了荟萃分析。
没有随机对照试验;然而,我们发现9项非随机研究,报告了1194名女性,使用符合我们纳入标准的多变量分析比较了二次肿瘤细胞减灭后的残留疾病情况。这些回顾性和前瞻性研究评估了复发性上皮性卵巢癌女性二次肿瘤细胞减灭术后的生存期。荟萃分析和单研究分析表明完全肿瘤细胞减灭至微小病灶具有预后重要性,因为这些女性群体的总生存期显著延长(大多数研究表明,与微小病灶组相比,所有残留疾病组的死亡风险在统计学上有显著更大差异)。没有任何一项研究报告无复发生存期。所有研究至少纳入了50名女性,并对重要的预后因素进行了统计调整。一项研究比较了次优(>1厘米)与最佳(<1厘米)肿瘤细胞减灭,结果表明,如果无法实现微小病灶,将肿瘤细胞减灭至小于1厘米有获益(风险比(HR)3.51,95%置信区间1.84至6.70)。同样,一项研究发现,与术后残留疾病大于0.5厘米的女性相比,肿瘤细胞减灭至小于0.5厘米的女性死亡风险更低(未报告风险比;P值<0.001)。由于这些研究的非随机性质,存在较高的偏倚风险,尽管对重要的预后因素进行了统计调整,但选择是基于肿瘤细胞减灭的回顾性可实现性,而非意向性治疗,因此一定程度的偏倚是不可避免的。没有任何一项研究报告不良事件、生活质量和成本效益。
对于铂敏感的复发性卵巢癌女性,能够进行完全肿瘤细胞减灭(无可见残留疾病)的手术与总生存期的显著改善相关。然而,在缺乏随机对照试验证据的情况下,尚不清楚这是否仅归因于手术效果还是肿瘤生物学特性。间接证据支持对选定女性进行手术以实现完全肿瘤细胞减灭。需要根据具体情况仔细权衡大手术的风险与潜在益处之间的关系。