Suppr超能文献

联合支气管内超声和内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检术用于肺癌纵隔淋巴结分期的荟萃分析。

Combined endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for mediastinal lymph node staging of lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2013 May;49(8):1860-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the combined endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) techniques and clarify its current role for the mediastinal lymph node staging of lung cancer.

METHODS

Medline, Web of Science, Elsevier and Ovid were searched to identify suitable studies up to 15th July 2012. Two investigators independently reviewed articles and extracted data. All EBUS-TBNA plus EUS-FNA studies for the mediastinal node staging of lung cancer were systematically reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity and other accuracy measures were pooled using random-effect models. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarise overall test performance.

RESULTS

Eight studies met our inclusion criteria. The estimated summary measures for quantitative analysis of EBUS-TBNA plus EUS-FNA for mediastinal nodal staging of lung cancer were sensitivity, 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.90); specificity, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99-1.00); positive likelihood ratio, 51.77 (95% CI, 22.53-118.94); negative likelihood ratio, 0.15 (95% CI, 0.09-0.25); diagnostic odds ratio, 416.83 (95% CI, 140.08-1240.31); and area under the curve (AUC), 0.99.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence suggests that the combined technique is more sensitive than EBUS-TBNA or EUS-FNA alone. The diagnostic power of this combined technique is accurate. As an almost completely minimally-invasive examination, EUS-FNA plus EBUS-TBNA may replace more invasive methods for evaluating mediastinal node staging of lung cancer.

摘要

研究目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估支气管内超声引导经支气管针吸活检(EBUS-TBNA)和内镜超声引导下细针抽吸(EUS-FNA)联合技术的准确性,并阐明其在肺癌纵隔淋巴结分期中的当前作用。

方法

检索了 Medline、Web of Science、Elsevier 和 Ovid 数据库,以确定截至 2012 年 7 月 15 日的合适研究。两名研究者独立审查文章并提取数据。系统地综述了所有用于肺癌纵隔淋巴结分期的 EBUS-TBNA 加 EUS-FNA 研究。使用随机效应模型汇总敏感性、特异性和其他准确性测量值。使用综合受试者工作特征曲线来总结总体测试性能。

结果

八项研究符合纳入标准。定量分析 EBUS-TBNA 加 EUS-FNA 用于肺癌纵隔淋巴结分期的估计综合测量值为:敏感性,0.86(95%置信区间[CI],0.82-0.90);特异性,1.00(95% CI,0.99-1.00);阳性似然比,51.77(95% CI,22.53-118.94);阴性似然比,0.15(95% CI,0.09-0.25);诊断优势比,416.83(95% CI,140.08-1240.31);曲线下面积(AUC),0.99。

结论

目前的证据表明,联合技术比 EBUS-TBNA 或 EUS-FNA 单独使用更敏感。该联合技术的诊断能力准确。作为一种几乎完全微创的检查方法,EUS-FNA 加 EBUS-TBNA 可能取代更具侵袭性的方法来评估肺癌纵隔淋巴结分期。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验