Suppr超能文献

痴呆症老年人行为和心理症状的慢性抗精神病药物撤药与继续用药对比

Withdrawal versus continuation of chronic antipsychotic drugs for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia.

作者信息

Declercq Tom, Petrovic Mirko, Azermai Majda, Vander Stichele Robert, De Sutter An I M, van Driel Mieke L, Christiaens Thierry

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD007726. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007726.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic agents are often used to treat neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in dementia, although the literature is sceptical about their long-term use for this indication. Their effectiveness is limited and there is concern about adverse effects, including higher mortality with long-term use. When behavioural strategies have failed and drug therapy is instituted, regular attempts to withdraw these drugs are recommended. Physicians, nurses and families of older people with dementia are often reluctant to try to stop antipsychotics, fearing deterioration of NPS. Strategies to reduce antipsychotic use have been proposed, but a systematic review of interventions aimed at withdrawal of antipsychotic agents in older people with dementia has not yet been performed.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether withdrawal of antipsychotic agents is successful in older people with dementia in community or nursing home settings, to list the different strategies for withdrawal of antipsychotic agents in older people with dementia and NPS, and to measure the effects of withdrawal of antipsychotic agents on behaviour.

SEARCH METHODS

ALOIS, the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (CDCIG), The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS, clinical trials registries and grey literature sources were searched on 23 November 2012. The search included the following terms: antipsychotic* or neuroleptic* or phenothiazines or butyrophenones or risperidone or olanzapine or haloperidol or prothipendyl or methotrimeprazine or clopenthixol or flupenthixol or clothiapine or metylperon or droperidol or pipamperone or benperidol or bromperidol or fluspirilene or pimozide or penfluridol or sulpiride or veralipride or levosulpiride or sultopride or aripiprazole or clozapine or quetiapine or thioridazine combined wither terms such as discontinu* or withdraw* or cessat* or reduce* or reducing or reduct* or taper* or stop*.ALOIS contains records from all major healthcare databases (The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS), as well as from many clinical trials registries and grey literature sources.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised, placebo-controlled trials comparing an antipsychotic withdrawal strategy to continuation of antipsychotics in people with dementia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, rated their risk of bias and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine trials with 606 randomised participants. Seven trials were conducted in nursing homes, one trial in an outpatient setting and one in both settings. In these trials, different types of antipsychotics prescribed at different doses were withdrawn. Both abrupt and gradual withdrawal schedules were used. The risk of bias of the included studies was generally low regarding blinding and outcome reporting and unclear for randomisation procedures and recruitment of participants.There was a wide variety of outcome measures. Our primary efficacy outcomes were success of withdrawal (i.e. remaining in study off antipsychotics) and NPS. Eight of nine trials reported no overall significant difference between groups on the primary outcomes, although in one pilot study of people with psychosis and agitation that had responded to haloperidol, time to relapse was significantly shorter in the discontinuation group (Chi(2) = 4.1, P value = 0.04). The ninth trial included people with psychosis or agitation who had responded well to risperidone therapy for four to eight months and reported that discontinuation led to an increased risk of relapse, that is, increase in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-core score of 30% or greater (P value = 0.004, hazard ratio (HR) 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09 to 3.45 at four months). The only outcome that could be pooled was the full NPI-score, used in two studies. For this outcome there was no significant difference between people withdrawn from and those continuing on antipsychotics at three months (mean difference (MD) -1.49, 95% CI -5.39 to 2.40). These two studies reported subgroup analyses according to baseline NPI-score (14 or less versus > 14). In one study, those with milder symptoms at baseline were significantly less agitated at three months in the discontinuation group (NPI-agitation, Mann-Whitney U test z = 2.4, P value = 0.018). In both studies, there was evidence of significant behavioural deterioration in people with more severe baseline NPS who were withdrawn from antipsychotics (Chi(2) = 6.8; P value = 0.009 for the marked symptom score in one study).Individual studies did not report significant differences between groups on any other outcome except one trial that found a significant difference in a measure of verbal fluency, favouring discontinuation. Most trials lacked power to detect clinically important differences between groups.Adverse events were not systematically assessed. In one trial there was a non-significant increase in mortality in people who continued antipsychotic treatment (5% to 8% greater than placebo, depending on the population analysed, measured at 12 months). This trend became significant three years after randomisation, but due to dropout and uncertainty about the use of antipsychotics in this follow-up period this result should be interpreted with caution.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that many older people with Alzheimer's dementia and NPS can be withdrawn from chronic antipsychotic medication without detrimental effects on their behaviour. It remains uncertain whether withdrawal is beneficial for cognition or psychomotor status, but the results of this review suggest that discontinuation programmes could be incorporated into routine practice. However, two studies of people whose agitation or psychosis had previously responded well to antipsychotic treatment found an increased risk of relapse or shorter time to relapse after discontinuation. Two other studies suggest that people with more severe NPS at baseline could benefit from continuing their antipsychotic medication. In these people, withdrawal might not be recommended.

摘要

背景

抗精神病药物常用于治疗痴呆症中的神经精神症状(NPS),尽管文献对其用于该适应症的长期使用持怀疑态度。其有效性有限,且人们担心其不良反应,包括长期使用会增加死亡率。当行为策略失败并开始药物治疗时,建议定期尝试停用这些药物。痴呆症老年人的医生、护士和家属通常不愿尝试停用抗精神病药物,担心神经精神症状会恶化。已经提出了减少抗精神病药物使用的策略,但尚未对旨在使痴呆症老年人停用抗精神病药物的干预措施进行系统评价。

目的

评估在社区或养老院环境中,停用抗精神病药物对痴呆症老年人是否成功,列出痴呆症和神经精神症状老年人停用抗精神病药物的不同策略,并衡量停用抗精神病药物对行为的影响。

检索方法

2012年11月23日检索了ALOIS、Cochrane痴呆与认知改善小组(CDCIG)的专业注册库、Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、LILACS、临床试验注册库和灰色文献来源。检索词包括:抗精神病药或神经阻滞剂或吩噻嗪类或丁酰苯类或利培酮或奥氮平或氟哌啶醇或丙酰奋乃静或甲硫达嗪或氯哌噻吨或氟奋乃静或氯噻平或美托哌丙嗪或氟哌利多或匹泮哌隆或苄哌利多或溴哌利多或三氟拉嗪或匹莫齐特或五氟利多或舒必利或维拉唑酮或左舒必利或舒托必利或阿立哌唑或氯氮平或喹硫平或硫利达嗪,并与诸如停用或撤药或停止或减少或降低或减量或逐渐减少或停药*等词组合。ALOIS包含来自所有主要医疗保健数据库(Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、LILACS)以及许多临床试验注册库和灰色文献来源的记录。

入选标准

比较抗精神病药物撤药策略与继续使用抗精神病药物对痴呆症患者影响的随机、安慰剂对照试验。

数据收集与分析

综述作者独立评估试验是否纳入,评估其偏倚风险并提取数据。

主要结果

我们纳入了9项试验,共606名随机参与者。7项试验在养老院进行,1项试验在门诊环境中进行,1项试验在两种环境中均进行。在这些试验中,停用了不同类型、不同剂量的抗精神病药物。采用了突然停药和逐渐停药两种方案。纳入研究在盲法和结果报告方面的偏倚风险总体较低,随机化程序和参与者招募方面的偏倚风险不明确。有多种结局指标。我们的主要疗效指标是停药成功(即不使用抗精神病药物继续留在研究中)和神经精神症状。9项试验中有8项报告两组在主要结局上无总体显著差异,尽管在一项对氟哌啶醇有反应的精神病和激越患者的试点研究中,停药组的复发时间明显更短(χ² = 4.1,P值 = 0.04)。第9项试验纳入了对利培酮治疗4至8个月反应良好的精神病或激越患者,报告停药导致复发风险增加,即神经精神症状量表(NPI)核心得分增加30%或更多(P值 = 0.004,危险比(HR)1.94,95%置信区间(CI)1.09至3.45,4个月时)。唯一可以合并的结局是两项研究中使用的完整NPI得分。对于该结局,停药组和继续使用抗精神病药物组在3个月时无显著差异(平均差(MD) -1.49,95% CI -5.39至2.40)。这两项研究根据基线NPI得分(14分及以下与> 14分)报告了亚组分析。在一项研究中,基线症状较轻的患者在停药组3个月时的激越程度明显较低(NPI激越,曼-惠特尼U检验z = 2.4,P值 = 0.018)。在两项研究中,有证据表明基线神经精神症状较严重且停用抗精神病药物的患者出现明显的行为恶化(一项研究中明显症状评分的χ² = 6.8;P值 = 0.009)。除一项试验发现言语流畅性测量存在显著差异且有利于停药外,个别研究未报告两组在任何其他结局上的显著差异。大多数试验没有足够的检验效能来检测两组之间临床上重要的差异。未系统评估不良事件。在一项试验中,继续使用抗精神病药物治疗的患者死亡率有非显著增加(比安慰剂高5%至8%,取决于分析的人群,12个月时测量)。随机化三年后这种趋势变得显著,但由于失访以及在此随访期间抗精神病药物使用的不确定性,该结果应谨慎解释。

作者结论

我们的研究结果表明,许多患有阿尔茨海默病痴呆症和神经精神症状的老年人可以停用慢性抗精神病药物,且对其行为无不利影响。停药对认知或精神运动状态是否有益仍不确定,但本综述结果表明停药方案可纳入常规实践。然而,两项针对先前抗精神病治疗对激越或精神病有良好反应的患者的研究发现,停药后复发风险增加或复发时间缩短。另外两项研究表明,基线神经精神症状较严重的患者可能从继续使用抗精神病药物中获益。对于这些患者,可能不建议停药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验