Suppr超能文献

单剂量口服布洛芬加可待因用于成人术后急性疼痛

Single dose oral ibuprofen plus codeine for acute postoperative pain in adults.

作者信息

Derry Sheena, Karlin Samuel M, Moore R Andrew

机构信息

Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD010107. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010107.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is good evidence that combining two different analgesics in fixed doses in a single tablet can provide better pain relief in acute pain and headache than either drug alone, and that the drug-specific effects are essentially additive. This appears to be broadly true in postoperative pain and migraine headache across a range of different drug combinations and when tested in the same and different trials. Some combinations of ibuprofen and codeine are available without prescription (but usually only from a pharmacy) where the dose of codeine is lower, and with a prescription when the dose of codeine is higher.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of a single oral dose of ibuprofen plus codeine for moderate to severe postoperative pain. We compared ibuprofen plus codeine with placebo and with the same dose of ibuprofen alone.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Oxford Pain Database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of articles. The date of the most recent search was 30 September 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised, double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled clinical trials of single dose oral ibuprofen plus codeine for acute postoperative pain in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently considered trials for inclusion in the review, assessed quality, and extracted data. We used the area under the pain relief versus time curve to derive the proportion of participants prescribed ibuprofen plus codeine, placebo, or the same dose of ibuprofen alone with at least 50% pain relief over six hours, using validated equations. We calculated the relative risk (RR) and number needed to treat to benefit (NNT). We used information on the use of rescue medication to calculate the proportion of participants requiring rescue medication and the weighted mean of the median time to use. We also collected information on adverse effects. Analyses were planned for different doses of ibuprofen and codeine, but especially for codeine where we set criteria for low (< 10 mg), medium (10 to 20 mg), and high (> 20 mg) doses.

MAIN RESULTS

Information was available from six studies with 1342 participants, with a variety of doses of ibuprofen and codeine. In four studies (443 participants) using ibuprofen 400 mg plus codeine 25.6 to 60 mg (high dose codeine) 64% of participants had at least 50% maximum pain relief with the combination compared to 18% with placebo. The NNT was 2.2 (95% CI 1.8 to 2.6). In three studies (204 participants) ibuprofen plus codeine (any dose) was better than the same dose of ibuprofen (69% versus 55%) but the result was barely significant with a relative benefit of 1.3 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.6). In two studies (159 participants) ibuprofen plus codeine appeared to be better than the same dose of codeine alone (69% versus 33%), but no analysis was done. There was no difference between the combination and placebo in the reporting of adverse events in these acute studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ibuprofen 400 mg plus codeine 25.6 to 60 mg demonstrates good analgesic efficacy. Very limited data suggest that the combination is better than the same dose of either drug alone. Use of combination analgesics that contain codeine has been a source of some concern because of misuse from over-the-counter preparations.

摘要

背景

有充分证据表明,在一片药中固定剂量联合两种不同的镇痛药,相较于单独使用任一药物,能在急性疼痛和头痛中提供更好的疼痛缓解效果,且药物的特定效应基本具有相加性。在术后疼痛和偏头痛中,跨越一系列不同的药物组合,并在相同及不同试验中进行测试时,这一点似乎普遍成立。布洛芬和可待因的某些组合无需处方即可获得(但通常仅从药房获取),此时可待因剂量较低;而可待因剂量较高时,则需凭处方获取。

目的

评估单剂量口服布洛芬加可待因用于中度至重度术后疼痛的镇痛效果及不良反应。我们将布洛芬加可待因与安慰剂以及相同剂量的单独布洛芬进行了比较。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、牛津疼痛数据库、ClinicalTrials.gov以及文章的参考文献列表。最近一次检索日期为2012年9月30日。

入选标准

针对成人急性术后疼痛,单剂量口服布洛芬加可待因的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照或活性药物对照临床试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立考虑纳入综述的试验、评估质量并提取数据。我们使用疼痛缓解程度与时间曲线下的面积,通过经过验证的公式,得出服用布洛芬加可待因、安慰剂或相同剂量单独布洛芬的参与者在六小时内疼痛缓解至少50%的比例。我们计算了相对风险(RR)和需治疗获益人数(NNT)。我们利用急救药物使用信息来计算需要急救药物的参与者比例以及使用急救药物的中位时间的加权平均值。我们还收集了不良反应信息。计划针对不同剂量的布洛芬和可待因进行分析,尤其是针对可待因,我们设定了低剂量(<10毫克)、中剂量(10至20毫克)和高剂量(>20毫克)的标准。

主要结果

有六项研究共1342名参与者提供了相关信息,这些研究使用了多种剂量的布洛芬和可待因。在四项研究(443名参与者)中,使用布洛芬400毫克加可待因25.6至60毫克(高剂量可待因),64%的参与者使用该组合后最大疼痛缓解至少50%,而使用安慰剂的这一比例为18%。NNT为2.2(95%CI 1.8至2.6)。在三项研究(204名参与者)中,布洛芬加可待因(任何剂量)优于相同剂量的布洛芬(69%对55%),但结果勉强具有显著性,相对获益为1.3(95%CI 1.01至1.6)。在两项研究(159名参与者)中,布洛芬加可待因似乎优于相同剂量的单独可待因(69%对33%),但未进行分析。在这些急性研究中,该组合与安慰剂在不良反应报告方面没有差异。

作者结论

布洛芬400毫克加可待因25.6至60毫克的组合显示出良好的镇痛效果。非常有限的数据表明该组合优于相同剂量的单独任一药物。由于非处方制剂的滥用,含有可待因的复方镇痛药的使用一直是一些担忧的来源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验