Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2013 May 2;8(5):e63185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063185. Print 2013.
Whereas the importance of family history (FH) is widely recognized in cardiovascular risk assessment, its full potential could be underutilized, when applied with its current simple guidelines-based definition (cFH): presence of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a first-degree relative. We tested the added value of a new, extended family history definition (eFH), also taking into account later onset of disease, second-degree relatives and number of affected relatives, on profiling cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population.
Longitudinal population study.
Random, representative population sample from Erpe-Mere and Nieuwerkerken (Belgium, primary care).
2524 male/female volunteers, aged 35-55 years, free from overt CVD.
Subjects were extensively phenotyped including presence of atherosclerosis (ultrasound) and a newly developed FH questionnaire (4 generations).
Compared to cFH, eFH was superior in predicting an adverse risk profile (glycemic state, elevated blood pressure, lipid abnormalities, presence of metabolic syndrome components) and presence of atherosclerosis (all age & sex-adjusted p<0.05). Unlike cFH, eFH remained a significant predictor of subclinical atherosclerosis after adjusting for confounders. Most relations with eFH were not graded but showed clear informational breakpoints, with absence of CVD (including late onset) in any first-degree relative being a negative predictor of atherosclerosis, and a particularly interesting phenotype for further study.
A novel, extended FH definition is superior to the conventional definition in profiling cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population. There remain clear opportunities to refine and increase the performance and informational content of this simple, readily-available inexpensive tool.
尽管家族史(FH)在心血管风险评估中具有重要意义,但由于其目前基于简单指南的定义(cFH),即一级亲属中存在早发心血管疾病(CVD),其潜在作用可能未得到充分利用。我们测试了一种新的、扩展的家族史定义(eFH)的附加价值,该定义还考虑了疾病的较晚发病、二级亲属和受影响亲属的数量,以在普通人群中对心血管风险和动脉粥样硬化负担进行分析。
纵向人群研究。
比利时(初级保健)厄尔佩-梅尔和尼乌沃肯随机、代表性的人群样本。
2524 名 35-55 岁、无明显心血管疾病的男性/女性志愿者。
受试者进行了广泛的表型分析,包括动脉粥样硬化(超声)和新开发的 FH 问卷(4 代)的存在。
与 cFH 相比,eFH 在预测不良风险特征(血糖状态、血压升高、血脂异常、代谢综合征成分存在)和动脉粥样硬化存在方面更为优越(所有年龄和性别调整后的 p<0.05)。与 cFH 不同,eFH 在调整混杂因素后仍然是亚临床动脉粥样硬化的显著预测因子。与 eFH 的大多数关系不是分级的,而是显示出明确的信息断点,即任何一级亲属中无 CVD(包括晚期发病)是动脉粥样硬化的负预测因子,这是一个特别有趣的表型,值得进一步研究。
一种新的、扩展的 FH 定义在普通人群中对心血管风险和动脉粥样硬化负担的分析优于传统定义。仍有明确的机会来改进和提高这种简单、现成、廉价工具的性能和信息含量。