Dettmer S, Schmiedl A, Meyer S, Giesemann A, Pabst R, Weidemann J, Wacker F K, Kirchhoff T
Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Germany.
Rofo. 2013 Sep;185(9):838-43. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1335048. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
Evaluation and analysis of the integrative course "Radiological Anatomy" established since 2007 at the Medical School Hannover (MHH) in comparison with conventional education.
Anatomy and radiology are usually taught separately with a considerable time lag. Interdisciplinary teaching of these associated subjects seems logical for several reasons. Therefore, the integrative course "Radiological Anatomy" was established in the second year of medical education, combining these two closely related subjects. This interdisciplinary course was retrospectively evaluated by consideration of a student questionnaire and staff observations. The advantages and disadvantages of integrative teaching in medical education are discussed.
The course ratings were excellent (median 1; mean 1.3 on a scale of 1 to 6). This is significantly (p < 0.001) better than the average of all evaluated courses in the respective term (grade 2.8). The course improved the anatomical comprehension (90 %) and the students stated that the topics were relevant for their future medical education (90 %). Furthermore, interest in the subject's anatomy and radiology increased during the course (88 %). According to the students' suggestions the course was enhanced by a visitation in the Department of Radiology and the additional topic central nervous system.
Integrative teaching of anatomy and radiology was well received by the students. Both, anatomical and radiological comprehension and the motivation to learn were improved. However, it should be considered, that the amount of work and time required by the teaching staff is considerably increased compared to traditional teaching.
对汉诺威医学院(MHH)自2007年起开设的“放射解剖学”整合课程进行评估与分析,并与传统教学进行比较。
解剖学和放射学通常分开授课,且时间间隔较长。基于多个原因,对这些相关学科进行跨学科教学似乎是合理的。因此,在医学教育的第二年开设了“放射解剖学”整合课程,将这两个密切相关的学科结合起来。通过学生问卷和教师观察对这一跨学科课程进行回顾性评估。讨论了医学教育中整合教学的优缺点。
课程评分优秀(中位数为1;在1至6分的评分标准中平均分为1.3)。这显著优于(p < 0.001)相应学期所有评估课程的平均分(2.8分)。该课程提高了解剖学理解能力(90%),学生们表示这些主题与他们未来的医学教育相关(90%)。此外,在课程期间,学生对解剖学和放射学学科的兴趣有所增加(88%)。根据学生的建议,通过参观放射科和增加中枢神经系统这一主题对课程进行了改进。
解剖学和放射学的整合教学受到了学生的好评。解剖学和放射学的理解能力以及学习动机均得到了提高。然而,应该考虑到,与传统教学相比,教师所需的工作量和时间大幅增加。