Sultan B, Benn P, Mahungu T, Young M, Mercey D, Morris-Jones S, Miller R F
Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK.
Int J STD AIDS. 2013 Oct;24(10):775-9. doi: 10.1177/0956462413486459. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
There is currently no 'gold standard' for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), and both the tuberculin skin test and interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are used for diagnosis; the latter have a higher sensitivity than tuberculin skin tests for diagnosis of LTBI in HIV-infected individuals with lower CD4 counts. No evidence base exists for selection of IGRA methodology to identify LTBI among human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in the UK. We prospectively evaluated two commercially available IGRA methods (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In Tube [QFG] and T-SPOT.TB) for testing LTBI among HIV-infected patients potentially nosocomially exposed to an HIV-infected patient with 'smear-positive' pulmonary tuberculosis. Among the exposed patients median CD4 count was 550 cells/µL; 105 (90%) of 117 were receiving antiretroviral therapy, of who 104 (99%) had an undetectable plasma HIV load. IGRAs were positive in 12 patients (10.3%); QFG positive in 11 (9.4%) and T-SPOT.TB positive in six (5.1%); both IGRAs were positive in five patients (4.3%). There was one indeterminate QFG and one borderline T-SPOT.TB result. Concordance between the two IGRAs was moderate (κ = 0.56, 95% confidence interval = 0.27-0.85). IGRAs were positive in only 4 (29%) of 14 patients with previous culture-proven tuberculosis. No patient developed tuberculosis during 20 months of follow-up.
目前,潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)的诊断尚无“金标准”,结核菌素皮肤试验和干扰素-γ释放试验(IGRAs)都用于诊断;对于CD4计数较低的HIV感染者,后者在诊断LTBI方面比结核菌素皮肤试验具有更高的敏感性。在英国,尚无证据支持选择IGRA方法来识别感染人类免疫缺陷病毒的患者中的LTBI。我们前瞻性地评估了两种市售的IGRA方法(全血γ干扰素释放试验[QFG]和T-SPOT.TB),用于检测可能在医院内接触过一名涂片阳性肺结核HIV感染者的HIV感染患者中的LTBI。在这些暴露患者中,CD4计数中位数为550个细胞/µL;117名患者中有105名(90%)正在接受抗逆转录病毒治疗,其中104名(99%)的血浆HIV载量检测不到。12名患者(10.3%)的IGRAs呈阳性;QFG呈阳性的有11名(9.4%),T-SPOT.TB呈阳性的有6名(5.1%);两种IGRAs均呈阳性的有5名患者(4.3%)。有1例QFG结果不确定,1例T-SPOT.TB结果为临界值。两种IGRAs之间的一致性为中等(κ = 0.56,95%置信区间 = 0.27 - 0.85)。14名既往经培养证实患有结核病的患者中,只有4名(29%)的IGRAs呈阳性。在20个月的随访期间,没有患者发生结核病。