Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 2;8(9):e72644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072644. eCollection 2013.
A number of case-control studies were conducted to investigate the association of apolipoprotein E (Apo E) polymorphisms with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). But the results remain controversial. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively evaluate the relationship between a common ε2/ε3/ε4 polymorphism in Apo E gene on the risk of POAG.
A comprehensive literature search for studies published up to April 2013 was performed. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing random-effects models irrespective of between-study heterogeneity. Publication bias of literatures was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test.
A total of 12 studies including 1916 cases and 1756 controls meeting the predefined criteria were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, the Apo E ε2 allele and ε4 allele were not associated with POAG, compared with those carrying ε3 allele, with ORs of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.23; P=0.872) and 1.05 (95% CI, 0.78 to 1.41; P=0.743), respectively. Genotypic analysis also found no significant association between the ε4 carriers (ε3/ε4+ε4/ε4), ε2 carriers (ε2/ε3+ε2/ε2) and POAG, compared with participants with Apo E ε3/3, with ORs of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.25; P=0.543) and 1.08 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.57; P=0.694), respectively. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, source of controls, genotyping methods, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium or not, or type of the POAG, still no obvious associations were found.
This meta-analysis suggests that Apo E ε2/ε3/ε4 polymorphisms may not be associated with the risk of POAG. However, well-designed studies with larger sample size and more ethnic groups are required to further validate the results.
多项病例对照研究旨在调查载脂蛋白 E(ApoE)多态性与原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)之间的关联。但结果仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在全面评估 ApoE 基因常见的 ε2/ε3/ε4 多态性与 POAG 风险之间的关系。
对截至 2013 年 4 月发表的研究进行了全面的文献检索。使用随机效应模型计算汇总优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI),无论研究间异质性如何。使用漏斗图和 Egger 检验评估文献的发表偏倚。
共有 12 项研究(包括 1916 例病例和 1756 例对照)符合纳入标准,纳入本荟萃分析。总体而言,与携带 ε3 等位基因相比,ApoE ε2 等位基因和 ε4 等位基因与 POAG 无关,OR 值分别为 0.98(95%CI,0.79 至 1.23;P=0.872)和 1.05(95%CI,0.78 至 1.41;P=0.743)。基因型分析还发现,与 ApoE ε3/3 相比,ε4 携带者(ε3/ε4+ε4/ε4)和 ε2 携带者(ε2/ε3+ε2/ε2)与 POAG 之间无显著关联,OR 值分别为 0.91(95%CI,0.66 至 1.25;P=0.543)和 1.08(95%CI,0.74 至 1.57;P=0.694)。按种族、对照来源、基因分型方法、哈迪-温伯格平衡与否或 POAG 类型进行亚组分析,仍未发现明显关联。
本荟萃分析提示 ApoE ε2/ε3/ε4 多态性可能与 POAG 的发病风险无关。然而,需要更大样本量和更多种族的精心设计的研究来进一步验证这些结果。