Suppr超能文献

纤维肌痛的书面疼痛神经科学教育:一项多中心随机对照试验。

Written pain neuroscience education in fibromyalgia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

van Ittersum Miriam W, van Wilgen C Paul, van der Schans Cees P, Lambrecht Luc, Groothoff Johan W, Nijs Jo

机构信息

Research and Innovation Group in Health Care and in Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2014 Nov;14(8):689-700. doi: 10.1111/papr.12137. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

Abstract

Mounting evidence supports the use of face-to-face pain neuroscience education for the treatment of chronic pain patients. This study aimed at examining whether written education about pain neuroscience improves illness perceptions, catastrophizing, and health status in patients with fibromyalgia. A double-blind, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with 6-month follow-up was conducted. Patients with FM (n = 114) that consented to participate were randomly allocated to receive either written pain neuroscience education or written relaxation training. Written pain neuroscience education comprised of a booklet with pain neuroscience education plus a telephone call to clarify any difficulties; the relaxation group received a booklet with relaxation education and a telephone call. The revised illness perception questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and fibromyalgia impact questionnaire were used as outcome measures. Both patients and assessors were blinded. Repeated-measures analyses with last observation carried forward principle were performed. Cohen's d effect sizes (ES) were calculated for all within-group changes and between-group differences. The results reveal that written pain neuroscience education does not change the impact of FM on daily life, catastrophizing, or perceived symptoms of patients with FM. Compared with written relaxation training, written pain neuroscience education improved beliefs in a chronic timeline of FM (P = 0.03; ES = 0.50), but it does not impact upon other domains of illness perceptions. Compared with written relaxation training, written pain neuroscience education slightly improved illness perceptions of patients with FM, but it did not impart clinically meaningful effects on pain, catastrophizing, or the impact of FM on daily life. Face-to-face sessions of pain neuroscience education are required to change inappropriate cognitions and perceived health in patients with FM.

摘要

越来越多的证据支持采用面对面的疼痛神经科学教育来治疗慢性疼痛患者。本研究旨在探讨关于疼痛神经科学的书面教育是否能改善纤维肌痛患者的疾病认知、灾难化思维和健康状况。我们进行了一项为期6个月随访的双盲、多中心随机对照临床试验。同意参与的纤维肌痛患者(n = 114)被随机分配接受书面疼痛神经科学教育或书面放松训练。书面疼痛神经科学教育包括一本关于疼痛神经科学教育的小册子以及一通用于澄清任何困难的电话;放松训练组则收到一本关于放松教育的小册子和一通电话。修订后的疾病认知问卷、疼痛灾难化量表和纤维肌痛影响问卷被用作结局指标。患者和评估者均处于盲态。采用末次观察结转原则进行重复测量分析。计算了所有组内变化和组间差异的科恩d效应量(ES)。结果显示,书面疼痛神经科学教育并未改变纤维肌痛对患者日常生活的影响、灾难化思维或感知到的症状。与书面放松训练相比,书面疼痛神经科学教育改善了患者对纤维肌痛慢性病程的认知(P = 0.03;ES = 0.50),但对疾病认知的其他领域没有影响。与书面放松训练相比,书面疼痛神经科学教育略微改善了纤维肌痛患者的疾病认知,但对疼痛、灾难化思维或纤维肌痛对日常生活的影响没有产生具有临床意义的效果。需要通过面对面的疼痛神经科学教育课程来改变纤维肌痛患者的不恰当认知和感知到的健康状况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验