Martin Catherine L, Albers James W, Pop-Busui Rodica
Corresponding author: Catherine L. Martin,
Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):31-8. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2114.
OBJECTIVE To describe the development and progression of neuropathy and related findings among patients with type 1 diabetes who participated in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The main diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) outcome was assessed using clinical symptoms, signs, and nerve conduction study results during DCCT and repeated in EDIC year 13/14. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) was assessed by R-R response to paced breathing, Valsalva ratio, and blood pressure response to standing during DCCT and in EDIC years 13/14 and 16/17. Additionally, symptoms reflecting neuropathic pain and autonomic function (including hypoglycemia awareness) were collected yearly in EDIC using standardized questionnaires; peripheral neuropathy was also assessed annually using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument. Assessments of genitourinary function were collected at EDIC year 10. RESULTS Intensive therapy during the DCCT significantly reduced the risk of DPN and CAN at DCCT closeout (64% and 45%, respectively, P < 0.01). The prevalence and incidence of DPN and CAN remained significantly lower in the DCCT intensive therapy group compared with the DCCT conventional therapy group through EDIC year 13/14. CONCLUSIONS The persistent effects of prior intensive therapy on neuropathy measures through 14 years of EDIC largely mirror those observed for other diabetes complications. DCCT/EDIC provides important information on the influence of glycemic control, and the clinical course of diabetic neuropathy, and, most important, on how to prevent neuropathy in type 1 diabetes.
目的 描述参与糖尿病控制与并发症试验/糖尿病干预及并发症流行病学研究(DCCT/EDIC)的1型糖尿病患者神经病变的发展及进展情况以及相关发现。研究设计与方法 在DCCT期间,通过临床症状、体征及神经传导研究结果评估主要的糖尿病性周围神经病变(DPN)结局,并在EDIC第13/14年重复评估。在DCCT期间以及EDIC第13/14年和第16/17年,通过对呼吸起搏的R-R反应、瓦尔萨尔瓦比值以及站立时的血压反应评估心血管自主神经病变(CAN)。此外,在EDIC中,每年使用标准化问卷收集反映神经病理性疼痛和自主神经功能(包括低血糖感知)的症状;每年还使用密歇根神经病变筛查工具评估周围神经病变。在EDIC第10年收集泌尿生殖功能评估结果。结果 在DCCT结束时,强化治疗显著降低了DPN和CAN的风险(分别降低64%和45%,P<0.01)。直至EDIC第13/14年,DCCT强化治疗组中DPN和CAN的患病率及发病率仍显著低于DCCT常规治疗组。结论 在EDIC的14年中,先前强化治疗对神经病变指标的持续影响在很大程度上反映了在其他糖尿病并发症中观察到的情况。DCCT/EDIC提供了有关血糖控制的影响、糖尿病神经病变的临床病程的重要信息,最重要的是,提供了有关如何预防1型糖尿病神经病变的重要信息。