Suppr超能文献

用于检测儿科患者呼吸道标本中甲型和乙型流感病毒的BD Veritor甲型/乙型流感检测系统与Alere BinaxNOW甲型/乙型流感检测卡的比较。

Comparison of the BD Veritor System for Flu A+B with the Alere BinaxNOW influenza A&B card for detection of influenza A and B viruses in respiratory specimens from pediatric patients.

作者信息

Hassan Ferdaus, Nguyen Ashley, Formanek Ashley, Bell James J, Selvarangan Rangaraj

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Mar;52(3):906-10. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02484-13. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

Abstract

The performance characteristics of two commercially available rapid tests for influenza, the BD Veritor System for Flu A+B (BD) and the Alere BinaxNOW influenza A&B card (BN), were evaluated using 200 frozen clinical specimens collected from January 2011 to June 2012 from pediatric patients. Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was used as the gold standard to evaluate the results obtained by the two different assays. Of the 200 specimens tested, real-time RT-PCR assay detected influenza A or B virus in 116 samples, while BD detected 104 samples and BN detected 84 samples as positive. The overall sensitivity and specificity for detection of both influenza A and B virus in comparison to those of real-time RT-PCR were 89.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.2 to 94.3) and 98.8% (95% CI, 92.6 to 99.9) for BD Veritor and 72.4% (95% CI, 63.2 to 80.0) and 100% (95% CI, 94.5 to 100.0) for BinaxNOW. Workflow analysis indicated that overall processing times for a batch size of 10 specimens were virtually identical between both systems. Overall, these results indicate that the BD Veritor assay was more sensitive than the BinaxNOW assay in detection of influenza A and B viruses in respiratory specimens from pediatric patients.

摘要

使用从2011年1月至2012年6月收集的200份儿科患者的冷冻临床标本,对两种市售流感快速检测方法——BD Veritor甲型/乙型流感检测系统(BD)和Alere BinaxNOW甲型/乙型流感检测卡(BN)的性能特征进行了评估。实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)用作金标准,以评估这两种不同检测方法获得的结果。在检测的200份标本中,实时RT-PCR检测在116份样本中检测到甲型或乙型流感病毒,而BD检测到104份样本呈阳性,BN检测到84份样本呈阳性。与实时RT-PCR相比,BD Veritor检测甲型和乙型流感病毒的总体敏感性和特异性分别为89.6%(95%置信区间[CI],82.2至94.3)和98.8%(95%CI,92.6至99.9),BinaxNOW分别为72.4%(95%CI,63.2至80.0)和100%(95%CI,94.5至100.0)。流程分析表明,两种系统处理10份标本批次的总体处理时间几乎相同。总体而言,这些结果表明,在检测儿科患者呼吸道标本中的甲型和乙型流感病毒方面,BD Veritor检测比BinaxNOW检测更敏感。

相似文献

4
A systematic review of rapid diagnostic tests for influenza: considerations for the community pharmacist.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Jan-Feb;57(1):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.08.018.
5
New rapid diagnostic tests: a real improvement for clinical use?
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Feb;53(2):751. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02882-14.
6
Clinical performance evaluation of the BD Veritor System Flu A+B assay.
J Virol Methods. 2014 Aug;204:86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
7
Reply to "new rapid diagnostic tests: a real improvement for clinical use?".
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Feb;53(2):752. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03031-14.
9
Comparison of Xpert Flu rapid nucleic acid testing with rapid antigen testing for the diagnosis of influenza A and B.
J Virol Methods. 2012 Dec;186(1-2):137-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.07.023. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
10
The use of saliva specimens for detection of influenza A and B viruses by rapid influenza diagnostic tests.
J Virol Methods. 2017 May;243:15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Laboratory and Point-of-Care Testing for COVID-19: A Review of Recent Developments.
Cureus. 2022 Aug 29;14(8):e28530. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28530. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
An integrated device for the rapid and sensitive detection of the influenza hemagglutinin.
Lab Chip. 2019 Feb 26;19(5):885-896. doi: 10.1039/c8lc00691a.
5
Rapid Antigen Tests for Influenza: Rationale and Significance of the FDA Reclassification.
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Sep 25;56(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00711-18. Print 2018 Oct.
6
Point-of-care diagnostics for respiratory viral infections.
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018 Jan;18(1):75-83. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1419065. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
10
Direct Comparison of Alere i and cobas Liat Influenza A and B Tests for Rapid Detection of Influenza Virus Infection.
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Nov;54(11):2763-2766. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01586-16. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

2
Evaluation of the limit of detection of the BD Veritor™ system flu A+B test and two rapid influenza detection tests for influenza virus.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Feb;75(2):200-2. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
3
Impact of technical training on rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) in group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 May;32(5):609-11. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1783-7. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
5
Evaluation of five rapid diagnostic kits for influenza A/B virus.
J Virol Methods. 2013 Jan;187(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
7
Comparison of Xpert Flu rapid nucleic acid testing with rapid antigen testing for the diagnosis of influenza A and B.
J Virol Methods. 2012 Dec;186(1-2):137-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.07.023. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
8
Diagnostic performance of the BinaxNow Influenza A&B rapid antigen test in ED patients.
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;30(9):1955-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
9
Update on influenza diagnostics: lessons from the novel H1N1 influenza A pandemic.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012 Apr;25(2):344-61. doi: 10.1128/CMR.05016-11.
10
Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of influenza pneumonia.
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2012 Jun;14(3):275-83. doi: 10.1007/s11908-012-0257-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验