Suppr超能文献

四项常见肺功能测试对呼吸系统症状患者的诊断价值:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Contribution of four common pulmonary function tests to diagnosis of patients with respiratory symptoms: a prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Respiratory Division, University Hospital, University of Leuven, Belgium.

Respiratory Division, University Hospital, University of Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Lancet Respir Med. 2013 Nov;1(9):705-13. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70184-X. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies of the diagnostic value of pulmonary function testing are available. We assessed the diagnostic contribution of four basic pulmonary function tests: spirometry, lung volume, airway resistance, and diffusing capacity.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled patients presenting to a pulmonologist with respiratory symptoms but no clear diagnosis from 33 hospitals in Belgium. Each patient had spirometry, lung volume, airway resistance, and diffusing capacity testing and all other tests necessary for a definitive diagnosis. Clinical history and pulmonary function data were presented to local focus groups, who established differential diagnoses and a preferred diagnosis after each test-the focus groups were masked to additional investigations. The final diagnosis was established by the attending physician on the basis of all the investigations done, and validated as the gold standard diagnosis by the local focus group. The primary outcome was a score calculated by 1/number of differential diagnoses, corrected for the accuracy of the diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were the number of differential diagnoses for patients with a correct preferred diagnosis and the proportion of preferred diagnoses that were correct. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01297881.

FINDINGS

We screened 1285 people, of whom 1023 were enrolled and 979 analysed. The primary outcome score was 0·226 after spirometry, increasing to 0·296 after measurement of lung volume, 0·373 after airway resistance test, and 0·540 after measurement of diffusing capacity (p<0·0001 for each step). The number of differential diagnoses decreased after each step (4·2, 3·4, 3·0, and 2·4; p<0·0001 for each step) and the proportion of correct preferred diagnoses increased (61%, 65%, 70%, and 77%; p<0·0001 for each step).

INTERPRETATION

The increase in scores shows a progressive reduction of the number of differential diagnoses and an increased accuracy of the preferred diagnosis. Each of the four classic pulmonary function tests contributes significantly and independently to the final diagnosis in new patients with respiratory symptoms seen by pulmonologists. Thus, funding of these tests is justified in that setting.

FUNDING

Belgian Society of Pneumology.

摘要

背景

目前关于肺功能检测的诊断价值的研究较少。我们评估了四项基本肺功能检测(肺活量测定、肺容积、气道阻力和弥散量)的诊断贡献。

方法

在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们从比利时的 33 家医院招募了因呼吸系统症状就诊但无明确诊断的呼吸科患者。每位患者均接受了肺活量测定、肺容积、气道阻力和弥散量检测以及明确诊断所需的所有其他检测。临床病史和肺功能数据提交给当地焦点小组,后者在每次检测后建立鉴别诊断并确定首选诊断——焦点小组对额外的调查结果不知情。根据所有检测结果,由主治医生确定最终诊断,并由当地焦点小组验证为金标准诊断。主要结局是根据鉴别诊断的数量计算的分数,对诊断的准确性进行校正。次要结局是鉴别诊断的数量(对正确首选诊断的患者)和首选诊断的比例(正确的患者)。该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01297881。

发现

我们对 1285 人进行了筛查,其中 1023 人入选并进行了分析。肺活量测定后主要结局评分(0·226),肺容积测量后(0·296)、气道阻力测试后(0·373)和弥散量测量后(0·540)(各步骤均 p<0·0001)增加。每个步骤后,鉴别诊断的数量都减少(4·2、3·4、3·0 和 2·4;各步骤均 p<0·0001),首选诊断的正确率提高(61%、65%、70%和 77%;各步骤均 p<0·0001)。

解释

评分的增加表明,鉴别诊断的数量逐渐减少,首选诊断的准确性提高。对于呼吸科医生接诊的新出现呼吸系统症状的患者,这四项经典肺功能检测中的每一项都有显著且独立的贡献,有助于最终诊断。因此,在这种情况下,对这些检测的资助是合理的。

资金

比利时肺病学会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验