Suppr超能文献

家庭式肺康复对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的临床益处。

Clinical benefits of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

作者信息

de Sousa Pinto Juliana M, Martín-Nogueras Ana M, Calvo-Arenillas José I, Ramos-González Jacinto

机构信息

University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain (Drs de Sousa Pinto, Martín Nogueras, Arenillas, and González); and University of Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil (Dr de Sousa Pinto).

出版信息

J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2014 Sep-Oct;34(5):355-9. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000061.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the benefits of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with severe and very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

Randomized clinical trial involving 58 patients. Pulmonary function, quality of life evaluated by the Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire, breathlessness evaluated by the London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale, and exercise tolerance evaluated by 6-minute walk distance were assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks. The program consisted of 2 weekly visits by a physiotherapist in the first 2 weeks, followed by visits twice a month, as well as weekly telephone calls. Training included breathing and stretching exercises and strength exercises (upper and lower limbs), along with endurance training, including walking, stair climbing, cycling, and treadmill walking, depending on available patient resources.

RESULTS

The treatment group (TG; n = 23) and control group (CG; n = 18) completed the study. Following the intervention, no statistically significant differences were found in pulmonary function in the TG and CG. The TG exhibited statistically significant differences in the activity domain (P = .008), impact domain (P < .001), and total scores of the Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (P < .001). In addition, the TG demonstrated statistically significant differences in all domains of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale and no differences were observed in the CG after 12 weeks. There was a statistically significant difference in the 6-Minute Walk Distance in the TG after rehabilitation (P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers evidence that home-based PR promotes benefits in the quality of life, breathlessness in activities of daily living, and exercise capacity in patients with severe and very severe COPD. Home-based PR must be considered as part of the treatment for patients who live far from hospitals even in severe COPD.

摘要

目的

评估居家肺康复(PR)对重度和极重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的益处。

方法

一项涉及58例患者的随机临床试验。在基线和12周时评估肺功能、采用圣乔治呼吸问卷评估生活质量、采用伦敦胸部日常生活活动量表评估呼吸困难程度以及采用6分钟步行距离评估运动耐量。该项目包括在前2周由物理治疗师每周上门访视2次,之后每月访视2次,以及每周电话随访。训练包括呼吸和伸展运动以及力量训练(上肢和下肢),还有耐力训练,包括步行(根据患者可利用的资源)、爬楼梯、骑自行车和在跑步机上行走。

结果

治疗组(TG;n = 23)和对照组(CG;n = 18)完成了研究。干预后,TG和CG在肺功能方面未发现统计学显著差异。TG在圣乔治呼吸问卷的活动领域(P = .008)、影响领域(P < .001)和总分(P < .001)方面表现出统计学显著差异。此外,TG在伦敦胸部日常生活活动量表所有领域均表现出统计学显著差异,而CG在12周后未观察到差异。康复后TG的6分钟步行距离有统计学显著差异(P = .008)。

结论

本研究提供了证据表明,居家PR对重度和极重度COPD患者的生活质量、日常生活活动中的呼吸困难以及运动能力有益。即使对于重度COPD患者且居住在远离医院的地方,居家PR也应被视为治疗的一部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验